''I'm not native (well, unless you count my Chippewa ancestors), but I know that the Lakota religious beliefs are remarkably similar to "mere" Christianity, to employ the phrase coined by the inimitable C.S. Lewis.''
That is not correct. The Ojibwe (or Chippewa) have many different beliefs, none of which are as similar to Christianity as they are to the heathen and Eastern faiths.
Also, if you have Ojibwe ancestors, you are Native, as well as a descended of an immigrant, and should have pride in all your ancestries they all add up to the ultimate sum; you.
''Christianity in its barest form is not arrogant, nor judgmental, of any one culture.''
That is debatable, but one thing for certain is that it is arrogant and judgmental about other belief systems and religions.
''It doesn't denigrate non-human forms of life, or insist that everything outside its own realm bow to its superiority.''
Yes it does. It teaches that the world is a place of sin and evil, in contrast to heaven and that all animals are subject to the will of man, they serve man. Satan is often called ''the Lord of the Earth'', in contrast to ''the Lord of Heaven'', for that reason.
''this religion was adopted as the state religion by the Roman government over 1800 years ago. Honestly, I think it's the worst thing that ever happened to this religion because it lent an arrogant supremacy to those who followed it, given the strength of the Roman government.''
It is the worst thing that happened, but not for the reason you think. The older Roman religion was far more tolerant than Christianity, and incorporated many, many belief systems. It preferred to equate (e.g. Tiwaz with Mars, Wodanaz with Mercury etc.) gods rather than replace them. Being a Roman citizen did not mean practicing the state religion or death until the Christian era, in which being a follower of your ancestral gods (in the case of Rome, the gods who built their city and influence the Roman world) or an atheist, or a foreign god who was from not Christ/YHWH, became illegal and meant death.
'' I told him that I first read of the Lakota religious beliefs when I was about 15, and my initial reaction was, "this sounds a lot like Christianity without all the boosheet Whites added to it."''
Most Christians are what most would call ''white'', though colour designation is meaningless. And I disagree completely with your interpretation. The polytheistic and animistic Lakota religion has little in common with Christian. It has a rough creator god in Inyan, but he is neither jealous nor does he punish others in hell for an eternity. He is also not the only god nor the only creature of anything. Wakhan Thanka is often painted as a god but it isn't, as Russel Means points out, Sioux beliefs are not monotheistic. It is a force more akin to karma or wyrd. The tale of the creation is more similar to the Norse myth of creature than the Christian one, with his blue blood become the ocean and rivers, in much the same way as the blood of Ymir became the ocean and rivers. The beliefs of the Sioux are more typical of Amerind-Eurasiatic beliefs than they are of Christianity. In Sioux beliefs every part of nature is sacred, and not just something that should be exploited by man (as YHWH commands in Genesis).
''"I think Jesus was a Hunkpapa. Or at least he came for a visit - and listened."''
That is withful thinking on the part of the Hunkpapa gentleman, probably based on his interactions with the syncretistic form of Christianity practiced but many Sioux. In reality Jesus Christ teaches a message different from that our the Sioux and a literalistic Christian who follows the Bible word by word wouldn't be able to say anything like that about any Hunkpapa holyman. If you are not a Christian, in Christianity, you are destined for hell and follow the devil. I do not have to tell you, I am sure, which of these beliefs is superior.
If you are sick of the ''I love Jesus 100% signature'', copy and paste this into your profile!
reply
share