Worth seeing?


I heard this movie was bad.

' Movies Made Me Murder '

reply

Review from Kindertrauma - Great Horror Review Site - This film all depends on what you are looking for - if you are looking for all out gore and total slasher, it is not.

Gosh darn, this hurts. I can’t tell you about the most intriguing aspect of BABYSITTER WANTED without ruining its most pleasant surprise. What’s even more painful is that I have to resist using what would be the film’s stronger images to illustrate this post for the same reason. Legitimate, well-thrown curve balls are so rare in horror movies these days that I couldn’t live with myself if I diminished even a fraction of this movie’s novel bite. Nope. I Just won’t do it. Who says I don’t have any scruples? (Put down your hand Aunt John, I thought those left over enchiladas in the fridge where fair game. Time to move on).

I know what you are thinking, “A babysitter in peril movie?… been there, done that,” and you’re absolutely right. In fact, the beginning of BABYSITTER WANTED does just about everything in its power to prove that it has no intention at all of covering new ground. Every cliché is in place: missing college girls, ominous phone calls from a shadowy stranger, even the standard small town feckless police officer makes an appearance in the form of BILL MOSLEY. Half way in, BABYSITTER may not be impressing you with its originality, but you have to admit it certainly does a fine job of imitating its slasher forefathers right down to its butter wouldn’t melt protagonist and its obviously humble budget. Midway in I was far from wowed, but seriously enjoying the cozy vapors of nostalgia.

Once the comfortable, hoary stage is set though, a genuine wild card is hurled. I’m not sure if it’s 100 percent convincing, but the effect is profoundly invigorating nonetheless. Suddenly the stakes are much higher than imagined and the opportunity for a fuzzy outcome deflates triple fold. It’s sort of like thinking you are stepping into a puddle and ending up waist deep in mud. Directors JONAS BARNES and MICHAEL MANASSERI deserve props for patiently allowing things to gel before dropping their hammer. Kudos is also deserved for standing back and allowing some black humor to seep through the cracks once the game board is flipped. This may not be the scariest movie ever made and it does require a bit of the old suspension of disbelief (if you don’t know how to do that… learn), but once things start ticking, it delivers quality suspense at regular intervals and ends up being a lot of fun.

Heading the cast as eighteen-year-old babysitter Angie is the closer to thirty television vet SARAH THOMPSON (7TH HEAVEN, ANGEL) who makes the journey from accommodating good girl to sneering survivalist without missing a beat. An equally impressive performance is given by BRUCE THOMAS, whose acting career began playing “Mini Ash #3” in ARMY OF DARKNESS and who has the chin to prove it. This misleadingly simple, covertly aggressive production is exactly what independent horror should be about. It also makes the case that the slasher genre itself has not even begun to fulfill its full potential. All the genre really needs is filmmakers like these who are not afraid to REALLY shuffle the deck before dealing the cards.

reply

Yeah it was awful.

reply

I liked it. Thought it could have been better in certain parts, but thought it was surprisingly refreshing for many reasons compared to the way most dumb horror films are made.

MOOOOOO

reply

your source is good, this is so overated for 6.0 and time-wasting

reply

It's a great little horror flick that doesn't take itself too seriously. The first half has you thinking dammit not another teen slasher. The second half... well don't want ruin it but but it gets pretty nasty at one point and has a twist that is so ridiculous it's good. The gore also holds up to the likes of House of a 1000 Corpses etc.

The movie has had a lot of bad press but I think people are forgetting this was made on a shoe string budget and I think they did a good job and probably had a lot of fun making it.

I you like a bit of blood splattered around and don't take it too seriously it's fun to see at least once. If you're expecting deep psychological intelligent horror errmm... rent The Shining.



'Even a stopped clock tells the right time twice a day'

reply

I totally agree. And most of the press and reviewers have appreciated what you've said above. I've actually read more positive reviews then negative ones. This wasn't a $10million film, what they did on a minimum budget was entertaining and fun as hell.

http://totalscifionline.com/reviews/3085-babysitter-wanted

http://efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=17580

http://slasherp.nexcess.net/htm/reviews/babysitterwanted.htm

http://whatsontv.co.uk/blogs/movietalk/2009/02/22/petes-peek-babysitter-wanted/

http://www.horror-movies.ca/horror_reviews_2609.htm

http://www.kindertrauma.com/?p=4624

Anyway, you get the idea. So there were quite a few "critics" that appreciated what these film makers did if not every fan did.

MOOOOOO0000000000000
I have mad cow.

reply

I thought the kid was a vampire, but he was the devil. Other than that everything was pretty predictable, with some good gore, but not a lot of it. Not a bad movie for the budget, but like the reviewer said, it gets much better the second half. For it's genre/budget, this should be closer to a 6.9/7.0 in my opinion...so yes, worth seeing once if nothing else...just fast forward to the 2nd half...



"Look, it's not that i'm lazy, it's that I just don't care..." - Peter Gibbons

reply