You're right. It IS messed up. Whether the couple is married or not that shouldn't have any bearing on whether the father can be a parent or whether the father should have a choice regarding what happens to his child.
It's a shame just because the woman was "assigned" the responsibility of carrying a child she should get all the say in what type of life it has. Afterall, she can't conceive a child on her own no more than the man can. So it should be a joint decision whether the child is put up for adoption, etc.
Throughout this movie I got the impression that the girl's mom was tryin to punish Matt for her daughter's pregnancy when in fact if her daughter was more responsible she would not have gotten pregnant. Why the woman always puts the task of birth control on the man is beyond me since THEY are the ones who get "burdened" or, as the mother said "give up 9 months of their life carryin that child." If it's such a burden, then why take the subject of birth control so lightly? If it's your body and you care for it, then take the responsibility of making sure nothing happens to your body that you don't want. Matt didn't rape her so she is more to blame for her pregnant state than he is. That's why birth control pills were invented.
And I'm glad the judge saw fit to give Matt custody. Afterall, BLOOD comes first and it was clear he had nothing but good intentions for what he did; he honestly LOVED that child which is more than I can say for his mother. For those who think that just because Matt took his child from the hospital without permission he is not a good parent, obviously you AREN'T a parent because if you were, you'd understand why he did it. I guess the girlfriend was being a good parent by giving her child up for adoption just so she can get on with her life and not be BURDENED anymore than she already has been by the likes of a kid!! Some parent.
---------------------------------------
"I don't love you enough to hate you!!"
reply
share