MovieChat Forums > The Uninvited (2009) Discussion > Dissociative Identity Disorder and Psych...

Dissociative Identity Disorder and Psychosis **SPOILERS**


Since we have people here theorizing on what mental ailments Anna was suffering from, I thought I'd make a post which outlines my case for what mental illness(es) were actually at play.

Firstly, we have psychosis -

Throughout the film Anna is seeing things which, in hindsight, were clearly not real. These hallucinations include seeing her dead mother, her sister (and believing her to be alive), the 3 dead children, and Matt (after he had died).

We also have paranoid delusions, which stem from a gross misinterpretation of Rachael's mysterious past (and subsequent name change), and a conflating of the stories told to her in the psych ward by Mildred Kemp with her subsequent beliefs about Rachael's past.

On Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) -

We're told at the start of the film by the psychiatrist/psychologist treating Anna that sometimes we survive by forgetting. This is extremely similar to descriptions by people who claim to have suffered trauma-based mind-control.

The splitting of one person into a number of "alters" is a psychologically-protective mechanism, whereby one (or more) "alters" is created to deal with the terrible suffering that the core-persona would not be able to endure.

People who have suffered sexual abuse...often incestuous (in a non-mind-control capacity) have also described similar coping mechanisms, where during the day they would go about their normal routine with no memory of what happened to them, and then dissociating during the times of abuse. This has also been linked to DID.

In hindsight we can see that "Alex" is the strong alter who protects Anna from both the guilt of causing the fire that took both her mother's and Alex's lives...and even the fact that Alex died at all. This knowledge has essentially been relegated to the "Alex" alter.

The "Alex" alter is also clearly responsible for killing Rachael, and we can only speculate that it was the same alter that killed Matt to prevent him from revealing the truth about Anna's involvement in the fatal fire.

Alternative Hypothesis ("She's a psychopath") -

This is one that I don't believe is supported at all by the film. A "psychopath" (which now comes under the umbrella diagnosis of "Antisocial Personality Disorder", or APD) is most strongly connected to a lack of empathy.

A great deal of studies have been done that show that there are definite patterns of brain abnormalities, typically through the use of fMRI - namely, reduced communication between the amygdala (an important emotional processing area, particularly when it comes to fear), and various sub-regions of the pre-frontal cortex (an important region for higher reasoning and impulse control, etc.).

The fact that Anna is distraught over the death of Matt makes it clear that she is not "psychopathic" or rather, suffering from APD...but instead has a genuine ability to feel for others...and feel grief.

Moreover, someone with APD would have no need to repress their involvement in an accidental fatal fire, as they would have no guilt. They certainly would not then go on to create an alter to deal with the reality of what they had done.

I believe that Anna's demeanor at the end is a result of the reintegration of her alter and core persona's, and the realization that the psychiatrist/psychologist was right about needing to return home to finish the work they were doing in therapy. Perversely, reintegration came at the cost of two lives, and the fact that she'll probably remain in a secure mental facility for the rest of her life.

She is almost certainly aware that this is not what he expected (see the dialogue about the watering can, and the doctor's suggestion that perhaps she was trying to put out the fire). He didn't fix her at all! Mildred Kemp was absolutely right.

These mental health professionals really had no idea how disturbed she was (because they were only seeing her front persona)...and their ignorance set off a chain of events that lead from accidental death, to outright murder.

She followed their advice...and look what happened! If I were her, I'd probably look a little smug too.

Movie Parallels -

Similar pathologies are present in other films. In case you haven't seen them I won't go into detail, but I recommend "Fight Club" and "Hide and Seek". The latter shows both DID and the creation of a hallucinatory reality during the times the alter was active.

Anyhow, I'd be interested in feedback...both critiques and plausible alternatives to this interpretation.

reply

I agree with your diagnoses for Anna, however, my problem is probably more with how the story attempted to play out based on those diagnoses. I find it utterly improbable that Anna would be discharged from a psychiatric hospital when she clearly does not understand the events that occurred the night of the fire or more simply that Alex is dead. If she returned home, only to get more "triggers" due to the environment, which she does, she could get very confused and even dangerous, if she can't accept them. And that is what happens. She gets more violent and more distraught. I'm surprised her father left her alone with Rachel, knowing how she felt about her. Additionally, when she left to go to the police station and told the sheriff that "Alex" was drugged at home by Rachel and in a lot of danger, the sheriff should have got her medical attention, realizing she was psychotic. Not go and get Rachel to bring her back home, to a clearly very dangerous situation!

For me the ending never worked, because it felt very untrue to the pathology of Anna. It felt like the writers desperately wanted to create a surprise twist ending and so they wrote an ending that was very untrue to all the characters. It's only my opinion, but that's how I felt. I also had a big problem with the fact that she was let out at all in the beginning when I got to the end of it. If the story is so improbable at the start, it isn't likely that it's going to get better by the end.

I appreciate your diagnoses though, and agree. They are the only things that seem to fit Anna's character.

reply

You've raised some really good points!

On the issue of the psychiatric hospital -

We know that it's a secure facility. It's not common practice now, but institutions that housed people with "garden variety" mental illnesses (depression, anxiety disorders, etc.), the handicapped, people with degenerative brain disorders, the profoundly disturbed, and the criminally insane (and various combinations of these), have existed in the past.

Given the remoteness of the house, I can only theorize that the have a local institution that caters to many different types of mentally disturbed people from the surrounding areas...and this is not unprecedented. The odd thing is that she would return to the same ward that she started at.

See, assuming Mildred Kemp was never actually charged with any crime but wound up in that facility for some other reason (presumably non-violent), we can reasonably assume that she would be on the same floor as a suicidal girl who has been traumatized by a fatal fire.

If Mildred lived/worked locally (and assuming that whole story about the dead children is true, including the newspaper article), it would explain the tomb stones in the cemetery in which Matt was buried. Mildred may never have been charged, but being a sultana short of a fruit-cake, ended up in a secure facility anyhow, but in a ward far less restrictive than someone who is considered criminally insane.

So, basically...the start is feasible...but the fact that Anna beats a murder wrap on the basis of her psychosis (DID is pretty controversial in court rooms and even amongst mental health professionals, so I'm assuming psychosis is what they used as a legal defense)...she'd then return to a secure ward for the criminally insane...not with those who are not violent criminals, but need to be on a secure ward for their own safety.

If Mildred was known to be criminally insane at the start, she wouldn't have been on the same ward as Anna. Alternatively, if Anna was known to be criminally insane from the start, that kind of messes up every subsequent event in this story, including her release from the mental institution, and every reaction (or non-reaction) to her deteriorating mental state thereafter.

Speaking of which -

I'm surprised her father left her alone with Rachel, knowing how she felt about her.


True...but even her psychologist/psychiatrist didn't pick up on Anna's psychosis or DID, and she was *reasonably* amicable to Rachael (at least outwardly) for most of the film...particularly the start. It's feasible that he had no idea there was any danger, and the worse that would happen is his daughter would lock herself in her room and sulk, or act like a bitch. With a new potential step-mother, her behavior could be construed as pretty normal (statistically), so no red flags would be raised in his mind.

If one assumes he perceived no danger, leaving your daughter and girlfriend alone together, even though they may spend the whole time fighting...well it's not the best parenting, but it's not too far fetched, especially for a father who has to travel for work. Plus he seemed kind of detached from their issues. I think he was one of those "let 'em sort it out themselves" types.

I mean most mentally ill people aren't a danger to others and while Anna was increasingly displeased by Rachael's presence, and did have a few questionable episodes (like staring off into space at the restaurant when "seeing" the dead children, or bumping the meat off the table when "seeing" the dead girl come from under the oven), up until that point, she didn't give anyone reason to think she would be violent.

Also, Rachael could be bitchy too (like with the "meat episode")...so her father may have interpreted her behavior as normal resistance to Anna feeling like Rachael was taking her mother's place.

I personally found the father's actions to be questionable (and quite insensitive, moving a girlfriend in so fast), but not so unbelievable as to be considered a major plot hole.

Additionally, when she left to go to the police station and told the sheriff that "Alex" was drugged at home by Rachel and in a lot of danger, the sheriff should have got her medical attention, realizing she was psychotic. Not go and get Rachel to bring her back home, to a clearly very dangerous situation!


I absolutely agree...that's what they SHOULD have done.

The only feasible explanation is that because Rachael had nursing experience (and possibly discussed with the Sheriff, off camera, that she was equipped to deal with Anna's delusional state, at least for the night), that the Sheriff may have willingly underestimated the danger and let Rachel take her home.

Of course, if you're in the suburbs, the nearest hospital is probably no more than a half-hour drive away, but who knows how far it would be to the nearest Emergency Room (the only place open in the middle of the night) in such a remote location. This could have been a factor in the Sheriff's decision making.

I agree that it was not protocol...but if we assume that they'd rather her go back to the mental ward (so that would have to wait until morning), rather than be stuck all night in an ER waiting for a psychiatrist to assess her, then be possibly stuck there on a 72 hour hold...and that the sheriff and Rachael (like the father) underestimated the danger that Anna's delusional state posed...well, this event is a stretch, but not totally beyond belief.

You're right though...It's not what would typically happen. It's not what SHOULD have happened. I would deem this one of those "strains credulity...but not beyond possibility" events. I think your objections are quite valid.

On the ending -

Even though there were some far-fetched (or at least credulity-straining) aspects to this film, I didn't mind the end. Then again, this is a matter of opinion and personal taste.

I saw that the moment she realized that she was the one who killed Rachael, and that Alex was dead, was the moment her two alters began to reintegrate and the entire puzzle of her strange dreams (outlined at the start), and lost memories, made perfect sense.

The particular psych-ward issue is the one thing that sticks out to me as non-explainable. It was obviously a plot device to explain the "Mildred Kemp" connection...but did so at the expense of believability. In my opinion this is the biggest plot hole, and I can't disagree with you at all on that.

In summary -

The issues you've raised are quite valid, and while I debate how problematic some of them are to the overall believability of the story, they all merit mention, and I'm glad you brought them up.

I hope you don't mind my own breakdown of how much each one affects the overall believability of the story, and why.

Anyhow, thanks very much for your feedback. I really appreciate it.

reply

The truth is that psychiatrists don't really know what they're doing half the time. I can't say for sure I believe that "mental disease" is a valid, biological concept in the same line as "heart disease".

I'm not saying people can't have psychological problems or that Anna, in this movie, does not suffer from any severe psychological problem/s but psychiatry, as a whole, is a joke.

There are issues with psychotherapy as well but at least that one tries to uncover the patient's real psychological problems.

Honestly though, what I think the realistic thing that would happen in this movie is Anna would commit suicide (which she did) and if she survived and could not bear the truth, would kill Rachel out of impulsive rage or delude/pretend she NEEDS to be killed (which is exactly what happened in the movie, surprise surprise!)

reply

I just finished watching this again she really didn't seem to have DID to me, because Alex wasn't an alter, she was a hallucination. Anna never seems to take on her personality...she just sees her. We don't even see her talking to her, like she's just sitting in the tub, staring. She seems almost like a paranoid schizophrenic. Maybe the trauma of killing her mother and sister is what...brought it out? Because I'm sure the doctor wouldn't think she was ready to go home if she had acted this way...in front of him? I'm not an expert by any means...but yeah that's my take on it.

reply

also I know that schizophrenia is biological/genetic but intense stress can cause it to...show up...when it does? I don't know how to phrase that. Also I realize that Alex could have been an alter when she killed Matt and Rachel...I guess. I just don't know if they were going for DID, or something else because it presented itself in an inconsistent way, in my opinion.

reply

You are right. It did seem inconsistent. I believe that Alex was an alter for Anna, but at times I think she was also hallucinating Alex. Like when Anna was running through the house screaming at Rachel, where is Alex? Thinking Rachel had drugged Alex. But then there are times when it seems that Alex was an alter. There was a scene when Anna and Rachel were driving and came back from having lunch and shopping. When they got to the house, Rachel called Anna "Al", like short for Alex!? I have watched this part numerous times and I swear she says it every rime. Then Anna goes inside to look for Alex and you hear Rachel and her father outside talking and she says that she lost her for a while there. So it seems to me that they are both aware that she is either Anna or Alex and the psychiatrist is aware too, as they tell Anna they have been talking to the doctor and she may not be able to stay at home. What bothers me though is that Rachel is the one who always tells Anna this. It should be her father. It is inappropriate otherwise and they should obviously be sensitive to the trauma Anna has been through.

reply

Hmm that's interesting, makes me want to watch it again ha

reply

Anna didn't have DID and Alex wasn't an alter at all - she was clearly a hallucination throughout the movie. Anna was having dissociative episodes caused by extreme mental trauma. As someone said before, Anna never saw herself as Alex or assumed her personality. The directors stressed the fact that they never showed Anna and Alex talking to each other in front of other people, because it would've given away she was hallucinating/imagining her sister was alive, which clearly nobody knew was the case or else they would've known she wasn't just manic depressive/suicidal and would've been way more wary of her behavior.
Nothing ever suggested that the "Alex alter" killed Matt, it was Anna, she just dissociated during it. Nothing suggested Alex was an evil character or a "bad alter" either, so that alter would have no reason to kill Matt. The movie seems to insinuate that there was a "good" and a deeply evil side of Anna. She was already "disturbed" enough to try and kill her father and Rachel in the first place, and she seemed to kill Matt in cold blood.
What puzzles me is why she would have dissociative episodes over events that she willingly inflicted (Matt's and Rachel's murders). Could it be she knew what she did it and did so willingly but felt extreme guilt hence dissociative episodes? Or did the initial trauma over Alex and mom's death cause her to have dissociative episodes at random? And she seems genuinely satisfied with Rachel's death and her father's life being ruined after she put everything together, your explanation of the ending scene is kinda goofy and far fetched. "She was laughing at the psychiatry system!" not really, she was happy because of what she did.

reply

cruelintention - I agree 100% with your assessment of her mental state and question regarding the memory lapse on both Matt and Rachel's killing.

In addition, I believe she was acting in a total state of shock after having seen her father cheating on her dying mother that her emotions were heightened to a point that she was not thinking rationally but acting on pure emotional reaction. She know that her actions mistakenly killed her sister and mother horribly and the psychological trauma "did something to her". At this point, doctors cannot scientifically confirm a diagnosis. It is like many soldiers returning home from war. Doctors understand that the soldier is different due to emotional trauma but "throw darts at a board" by prescribing certain medications because there is no confirmed medical way for many ailments of the soldiers. Even clinically diagnosed depression can be mistaken for bi-polar disease and vise-versa.

Anyway, the father should've been more engaged and there Anna should still have been seeing a Psychologist for therapy on a regular basis.

reply

Very spot on

reply