MovieChat Forums > Deliver Us from Evil (2007) Discussion > Most Weird/Disturbing Moments.....

Most Weird/Disturbing Moments.....


I don't mean to include the specific molestation stuff (which is of course BEYOND disturbing), I mean the outrageous moments that pop up in the film, where you sort of drop your jaw.

I think the strangest to me is when O'Grady says something like, "This therapist suddenly made me see that I had this tendancy, and it had created all kinds of problems."

Uhhh....ya THINK????

The word "tendancy" is so bizarre to use here! That word makes me think of things that can hint at themselves, but not actually come to fruition. I've usually heard it used within the (old fashioned) phrase "homosexual tendancies", which implies the person may have certain drives, or shades of drives, that would indicate they have some homosexual orientation....but for O'Grady to say he had "tendancies"???????????????

Surreal.

Maybe I don't actually understand that word, but it just seems so out-of-place in his context.

reply

I think the way he is using it is to get himself off the hook. He has these "tendencies" meaning that is just how he is, so it's not his fault. That's how I took it, but no matter how you slice it, I agree that it was very disturbing.

You must be the change you seek in the world. -- Gandhi

reply

Also, when he's talking about the letters he's sent, inviting his victims to visit him (in Ireland, no less, like they'll just plunk down money for that!), and he says, "I don't expect them to hug me, but I think they'll shake my hand, and say 'Okay, this is over,' and wish me the best..."

Mmmmmmmmmm-HMMM............Keep dreamin', 'ol chap!

reply

I really don't think he sees what he did to them as very harmful. I remember reading an article a few months back about a pedophile rights group that has several members that like to loiter about in chat rooms frequented by minors. One of these men had said something sexual to one of the teenage boys on there and was shocked when he received an angry response, as though it had never occurred to him that children and young teens actually DON'T want to have sex with adults. These creeps live in their own fantasy world and don't even realize it.

every day may not be good, but there is good in every day

reply

Yes, they do seem to have a different reality. They would have to, wouldn't they?

About 10 years ago, I read a review of some documentary on the NAMBLA group (who are all about saying it's just fine for grown men to have sex with little boys), and the reviewer mentions some disconcerting moment when one of the memebers, who sounded like some shaggy, unabomber-type recluse cretin, insisting that little children were constantly "eyeing him" suggestively, and making non-verbal overtures.

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

This was some private reality he'd invented to justify his belief that children really really want to be intimate with adults (specifically, HIM) and it's some kind of 2-way street.

Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!

reply

If you ever want to have a glimpse into the twisted mind of a pedophile, I found a discussion on Kylie Freeman aka "Vicky", the daughter of Kenneth John Freeman, whom is currently spending the rest of his life behind bars for sexually abusing his own daughter and then posting the videos on the internet. I have to warn you though, some of the posts on here are absolutely disgusting. (I have been posting under my first name, Al.) Some of these people post fairly graphic descriptions of these videos though. It just shows you how messed up a human being can really be, the way some of these people try to justify what this man did.

http://hitsusa.com/blog/201/kenneth-john-freeman

every day may not be good, but there is good in every day

reply

Oh dear. Sounds rather GRIM. I wonder if this man's daughter has any kind of an okay life today. I hope so.

Two other moments in this documentary that are strange are 1.) When crusty old Monsignoir Cain rubs his teeth in that nervous, rat-like way during his deposition, and 2.) When Archbishop Mahoney wears a sling on his arm to his first deposition. (What a nice bid for sympathy. I want to see the doctor's note!)

reply

I found all of the deposition scenes unnerving. Just the way O'Grady talked about them like it was not a big deal.

And the higher-ups fumbling like they didn't know what the person asking the questions were talking about. How can you look at yourself in the mirror knowing you're responsible for something like this?

And I CRINGED when he started writing those letters. Seriously?

I'm goin to Shaboom's!

reply

The letter business isn't so awful in theory...but he starts making it into this thing that's sick and all out-of-whack.

I guess someone might find some comfort in an abuser acknowleding that what they did was wrong, firsthand.....but anything beyond that, even "I'm sorry", just gets very weird. Why should they care how the abuser is feeling, one way or the other? What does "I'm sorry" do?

Maybe even hearing from the abuser that they know that what they did was wrong is useless. Obviously, it was wrong. It doesn't depend on how the abuser feels about it, or sees things.

Maybe a letter saying "You can come stab me to death" would be okay.

It's hard to think of what could be in a letter like that that would actually be of any use. But then, I haven't gone through what these people have.

reply

Yeah, the depositions scenes were often chilling. The one I found especially disturbing was with Mahoney, when the interviewer was clearly becoming upset with his stonewalling "I can't recall" answers and asked straight out, "If a priest in your charge was raping children, do you honestly think that is something you would forget?"

And naturally his lawyer objected and he never had to answer.


I think the saddest scene overall for me (particularly as a Christian) was Bob Jyono saying that the whole thing had made him realize that there is no God, and his daughter starting to weep at that statement. That is ultimately what is most tragic -- the entire lives of these men were meant to be devoted to serving God and leading others to Him, and everything they did had the exact opposite effect.

reply

I'm not very religious but that moment got to me too.


Deliver Us From Evil- 9/10
Eclipse - 7/10


OT

reply

Wow, I just read through a lot of the comments on that link you provided, Midwesternman, but I couldn't get through them all because they made me physically sick.
I was completely shocked and disgusted to see the MULTITUDE of people posting there trying to justify the abuse. I haven't seen the Vicky vids, but the idea that it's okay to have oral and anal sex with your 10-year-old daughter if she is a smiling and happy participant just amazes me. It troubles me to see so many people posting there seeming to be of that opinion.

reply

I agree. Tendencies makes it sound like something that can't be controlled, therefore less personal towards the victims. Kill em all, let God, Buddha, Allah, whomever sort 'em out!

I might as well enjoy my life and watch the stars play...........

reply

Two of the most disturbing moments for me were:

1. When O'Grady referred to his possible meeting with his victims as a reunion. That absolutely killed me.

2. When O'Grady said he had been molested by his older brother and that his older brother (and maybe him too, it was a bit confusing) molested their 9 year old sister. Nice family!

reply

2. When O'Grady said he had been molested by his older brother and that his older brother (and maybe him too, it was a bit confusing) molested their 9 year old sister. Nice family! >>

Yuh. I think they all had a little too much time on their hands....

reply

When it was stated he molested a 9 month old baby.

http://onefilmadayreview.blogspot.com/

reply

Yeah. That part about the 9 month old was absolutely horrendous. My parents made it about 20 minutes into this movie before they had to leave the room. They're not particularly religious, especially my father - who tends to more of an atheist like myself. Still, this movie was too disturbing for even him.

reply

...it can't be ascertained that he was telling the truth about being abused by his older brother when young.

True, abusers sometimes have been abused themselves and there's strong evidence to support that that may contribute to their later tendencies (it doesn't let them off the hook, though). However...here's a guy who's sometimes parroting back answers during his interrogations/depositions & interviews. He seems to want to inspire some sympathy in others for himself. He knows how to game the system--he's heard of other pedophiles being abused, he has that cover story under his belt, and it's a smart card to play if he's trying to make himself look less evil (he obviously doesn't see himself as bad, though).

He got away with tons of child rape and molestation for years because he's adept at lying. So I see no reason why we should take his statement in the film, to the camera, at face value.

reply

For me it would be the moment in the film where Cain said that he did not see the connection with him having prior accusations of fiddling a girl when the aegation of fiddling a boy came out.

I also kind of was shocked when everyone was taking about molestation and then the father turns around and said rape. That's what it was. It takes it to a whole level where I'm unsure of if he is raping kids or molesting them. I really am an advocate for people using the proper terms.

reply

Although pedophilic sex offenders are indeed rly sick and disturbing individuals, not all people with "Pedophilic" leanings are predators. Theres alot of them who knows that sexual relations with children is wrong and tries to get help about it. Not all of them are like O´Grady who lives in theyre own world where they rationalise theyre actions and absolve themselves of blame.

reply

The way O'Grady behaved during interview, frequently smirking in a way that suggested he was really rather pleased with himself, and coming out with things like his brilliant and sensitive idea for a reunion with people with whom as children he'd intimately acquainted himself... this could all I suppose be interpreted in various ways, such as part of his brain not working properly so he just didn't have a clue how inappropriate his behavior was on camera (let alone his previous behavior). But I couldn't help wondering if he was actually enjoying taking the piss out of the interviewer and whoever else was likely to see the film (including his victims, of course).

"I beseech ye in the bowels of Christ, think that ye may be mistaken."

reply

It didn't make my jaw drop because it fits pretty well into his disingenuous attitude throughout the film. As if he didn't know what he was doing, and the therapist suddenly let him see the light. He's consistent in phrasing things in a manner that make him sound less guilty.

For me thats the most disturbing part, he's doing all this supposedly on the premise of making his 'ultimate confession', but all he ends up doing is letting his victims see how disconnected he really is from the consequences of his actions. Instead of a confession it feels like a final insult to injury. This culminates when he actually winks at the camera when saying 'I hope to see you all soon'. That bit was really unbelievable.

reply

There were obviously a lot of disturbing moments in this film but I think what got to me the most was watching the screen fade out because I knew it was about to show that map indicating him being moved to yet another Parrish. So sad and shocking.

reply

I just watched this documentary, and I found it very disturbing, to say the least. One of the most disturbing things were how the words 'offended' was used, as in when the priest says he 'offended' the children, meaning molested them.
The priest himself creeped me out completely. He didn't seem remorseful at all, in fact he seemed to revel in telling what it was he did. Then the 're-union' idea - I wished I could have spat in his face.


http://www.youtube.com/user/Morgana0x

reply