Don't take things so strictly. Adam and Eve were not people, Genesis is more of a metaphor than anything else. They are the whole human race at its early stage. As for the apple, we are talking about the fruit of forbidden knowledge. Satan, a proud fallen angel jealous of the perfectness of human pushed it to the far limit of God's Law and seduced it, just to make them sin, because he knew the human race would then be lost to God and all for him to play with and destroy. Anyway, you are missing the whole point (a lot of us are, so often) : God DID FORGIVE US for turning our back to Him by sending his son Jesus, God made human (which takes a lot of nerve from dear old God, admit it, to come among us and live everything except sin up to the point of a horrible death on the cross), to take us all back to Him. He did not make us pay, we did that to ourselves, and yet we fail to admit our responsibility (sooooo easy to blame God for all that's wrong).
Take it this way : if a murderer was to be exiled on a place far from grace, and there paid his debt, then had no choice but staying there after that, and start a new life, and have kids, and die happy surrounded by his own, then what about the kids ? Well, they would stay here right, it's their home : who could really blame past justice (and fair one, too) for being somewhere ? They would accept it as History. Just like most of the Australians did ! Well it's the same for us : our far far far ancestors got us there. We can't blame whoever sent them, but we can consider their actions took them there. And accept it as History. But history is not to be taken like in a cafeteria, with only the bits you like. If you seriously want to take the Adam & Eve myth for a basis of an argumentation, you have to take what follows up to the point we were all saved (and again, our choice to take that salvation). It's taking the beginning (literally !) of the book only and saying to the author "Man, what the *beep* ? We don't know how it ends from the beginning ?" Pretty silly, right ?
God is not tyrannical. He's just being highly pedagogic with us. Threat without any action following at some point never proved efficient. And boy he is PATIENT because we sure are terrible learners.
reply
share