no Razzies?


Totally dodged it. interesting.

reply

Nope, it doesn't really deserve it either just like it never deserved the Battlefield Earth comparison made by a few critics. Interesting though that Assassin's Creed is on the list, that movie seemed to of disappointed AC fans as well as general audiences and critics while Warcraft at least managed to gain support of the WoW fanbase. I've noticed that on Razzies forum, some people were shocked that neither Warcraft nor 2 other movies that were expecting to be on the shortlist aren't there but for my money, every single movie on that shortlist is more deserving than Warcraft.

reply

Assassins Creed was terrible, Warcraft was way better

reply

I guess there was too much competition.

reply

Problem is some critics went out to destroy the film. Just look at the scores from various sites from the audiences and it scored well.

IMDB 7.0
RT 72%
Cinema score B+

Never really felt that some of the critics go to score a film with an agenda but atm some I feel do.

It never deserved a razzie its close to an Oscar on the special effects but a few scenes just look very poor.

reply

maybe the people who give the Razzies nominations have better judgment, than the "professional" film critics.

reply

No! Because the film is very good.

reply

A lot of film critics might disagree with you. Though, I also thought it was decent.

reply

It was a bad movie but there is plenty of competition.

reply

But it didn't even make it to the shortlist, so the Razzie voters never even got the chance of nominating it.

reply

Nope because the movie wasn't even close enough to deserve one. Only interesting to idiots like you and the dumb liberal moron critics.

reply

Its a video game adaption that don`t suck, of course it dodged it!

reply