First one is better.....


I beat the first one,and now I have the second one.
I am pretty dissapointed by it.
In the first one,when you were done with a mission you could goof around.
Now it doesn't let you.
And pox is destroyed.
Pox rules!
Anyways,I also think the graphics in the first one were better even though they say the second one is better.
The towns people in #1 were funnier and more fun to mess around with.
The second one just has boring pot headed hippies.
To me the first one is more fun.


Yes-I am a girl and I love video games.

reply

I think they are both good games and u can mess around between missions.

reply

I know. And the first one actually felt like you were an alien invader out of some 50s Ed Wood movie. Number 2 felt like some sort of strange surreal sixties spy film.

reply

Yeah I totally agree Satnav.
I was like,"What is this????"
Its a good game though i'm pretty far.

Miley Cyrus

reply

I love both games (yes, I have no life) but I think the problem is, instead of getting Destroy All Humans 2, we got, Destroy a Couple of Humans But Spend Most of the Game Killing Mutants and Aliens.

I just hope they don't make the same mistake with DAH!3.

Stay solid Boppers.

THE WARRIORS #30 scout

reply

The second one is kind of much more difficult than the first one. What people are thinking aren't as funny as the first one. THe controls are a teeny bit complicated.

So yeah, I'd say the first one is better.

reply

i absolutely HATE the fact though that they downgraded psychokinesis!
it made no sense why they did that!


you can basically launch someone 100 feet in the air at a building and they will still live without being hurt at all

reply

I think they're both great. This is the best video game series ever.

reply