Sex Scenes


The best thing about this movie -- the sex scenes. They're awesome. Everybody is naked.

reply

You've seen the movie?

I'll never let go, Jack. I'll never let go. -Titanic

reply

Are you going to respond about seeing the movie? What's up?

reply

Yes, I saw the movie. What kind of questions do you have?

reply

Does Toby Hemingway have a large part in the movie?

I'll never let go, Jack. I'll never let go. -Titanic

reply

Yes, Toby Hemingway falls in love with a girl and their relationship is explored in the movie.

reply

that doesn't really prove you saw it.
How did you see it if the trailers aren't even out.

reply

That's because the studio is testing the movie months in advance with an audience and then starts to cut a trailer. Anyways, the sex scenes really are good! Radha Mitchell does an almost full frontal, twice! Something to get excited about.

reply

Radha does go FULL frontal, and for a while. Topless for a long, long while, too. Beautiful body. Haven't seen a major actress go so fully nude in a long time.

reply

Hmmm. Does that mean you have not seen CAPONE(2003), or that you don't consider the woman to be a major actress? And the same question about THE PIANO(1999), even though it is a bit older.

Just curious...


BTW, I also appreciate Rhada in PITCH BLACK where she shows she can do action movies too. It is too bad the role played by Claudia Black included an early exit though; it was very different than her work in FARSCAPE, HERCULES, and XENA.

reply

So, he has a sex scene with this chick or what?

reply

You said that everybody was naked, and she asked if Toby Hemingway have
a LARGE part in the film...



http://stage6.divx.com/Film_Fanatic
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=12089049

reply

Just tell me Morgan Freeman doesn't go in the buff...

I refuse to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed man...

reply

so, i probably have to sneak into this movie?

reply

The way it works is these test screenings take place at regular movie theaters (usually in the LA area, sometimes in Phoenix, Chicago, New York, etc.) where a company rents out one of the auditoriums on a week day and starts sending recruiters out to the nearby popular areas (but mostly the theater) where they ask moviegoers if they want to see/be part of a free screening. The movie is scheduled to come out late Summer or something, according to IMDb. Also, the work print shown did not have a title yet, so "The Feast of Love" is no longer being used as the audience was informed at the start. Another title was mentioned in the introduction, better sounding actually, but it escapes me right now.

reply

They just officially announced that the title is staying Feast of Love. It's based on a great book, so it's good that they kept the title.

reply

It sounds like it just has the same title as the book; everything else is different.

I hate when they do that...

reply

is alexa davalos nude also? i want to see her naked, i loved her in chronicles of riddick.

reply

Yes, AD is naked.

reply

So they basically all have some nudity?

I'll never let go, Jack. I'll never let go. -Titanic

reply

Yes, the three lead women, and one lesser role. It's a frank, adult movie in the tradition of the movies of the 1970's.

reply

Release date has been set for Sept. 14, by the way. Informally.

reply

The nudity wasn't shown in a bad light at all. It felt natural, realistic. And, heck, frankly the best nudity on film in a while. If I may say so myself...

reply

Yeah not trying to sound like a perv but does toby hemingway have any sex , or nude scenes?

reply

Yes, he does.

reply

Does Shannon Lucio have any nudity?

Are Radha Mitchell and Alexa Davalos topless or is there more nudity?

Thanks

reply

Shannon Lucio, no.

RM and AD more, yes.

reply

Thanks, are RM and AD full frontal?

reply

Will it go wide as MGM intends or limited?

reply

Is there a video for the sex scenes for this movie.

reply

Don't think so... ya will have to see the movie for those.

reply


http://shareddarkness.com/2007/08/15/joke-of-day.aspx

^ Just a tease mention on FEAST OF LOVE in the above link, but it does include a funny line from the movie...

With regards to the nudity, yes, ADavalos and Radha do go nude, the latter full frontal. Selma Blair brief topless too.

New release date is September 28. Should go wide.






reply

Aaaaaaaand... another bit: http://shareddarkness.com/2007/08/24/feast-of-love-nudity.aspx


reply

[deleted]

^ Ha ha ha!

But still: vomit.

reply

I wonder if the sex scenes in this film are graphic and is the film worth all the hype.

reply

[deleted]

Can anybody answer me why is it here on imdb-forums so important to now about these topics and go into then in detail:

a) Do film have explicit content?
b) Can we see an actor/actress naked?
c) Is an actor/actress gay?

Really I would like to have an answer to that, because I wouldn't like to die in the thought that only adolescent teens are on these forums.

reply

[deleted]

I must be one of the few that don't go to a movie for the nudity and sex then. It really rather ruins it for me to see it on screen over-excessively, because it makes me feel like a perv to watch other people, even actors on screen, get it on. I'd rather them do it enough to get the point across (that is, as much as needed for the sake of the story) then get on with the plot.

reply

I can't believe this...

I have been the biggest fan of Alexa Davalos. Chronicles of Riddick, supporting her completely throughout Reunion. Completely loved her appearance on Angel. She made a huge impact on me.

And before you men get bitchy, I am a woman.

Cried when she was the dead one on Reunion and crying now because of her decision.

I can't believe Alexa is going to be nude in this film. I have lost all my respect for her. One of my favorite actresses... I'm ashamed. And you pigs go just to see nudity...

reply

If it makes you feel any better, she is remarkably good in the movie -- in many ways, its very heart. And her nudity is quite brief and tasteful. And there is nothing exploitative about the scenes.

reply

Well, she is a wonderful actress. But I couldn't sit through it, being a female, and watching 10 naked women and no naked men. It's degrading. No wonder women receive no respect. Some choose to do this.

reply

Someone is misinforming you. There are four naked women. Two of which are mostly concealed. And there are two naked men. It's never exploitative for a second. I saw the movie last night and the women i was with, ardent feminists all, cried at the end. They loved it.

reply

I also like Alexa Davalos...can someone describe her nude scenes? Did she go full frontal as I read somewhere ?!?

reply

Why is being naked degrading?
Why do you think the lack of respect (as you put it) is because of nudity?

There are so many things wrong with society, people and movies today but none of it has to do with nudity.

reply

The simple fact is that men like seeing nude women much more than women like seeing nude men. There is no point in talking about disrespect for woman and bla bla bla.

reply

There is nothing wrong in being nude. Nudity is a natural part of human life.

A whole different matter is allowing your "sensitive" areas to be touched during the shooting of "love making" scenes(squeezing breast etc.), I don't know if this happened during the film because I haven't seen it, I certainly hope not..because that would really be degrading and disgusting.

reply

I would like to take my mom to the movies this weekend. Are the sex scenes such that I would be uncomfortable watching this movie with her?

reply

They're beautiful and tasteful.

reply

If your mother is like most mothers, YES... you would be uncomfortable...I hope so anyway.

reply

I agree with fillygirl's comment several people up.
I can't understand the "necessity" of all the nudity and sex scenes. Don't knokw how many there are, but there must be at least a few. My local paper's reviewer said "copious copulation and incessant nudity." Copious, eh. What i'll never understand is why - and HOW - actors do this stuff.

reply

I just saw the movie this afternoon and the one comment I made throughout was "another nude scene?" After the first couple of times, it gets to be gratuitous and for absolutely no reason. When I see Morgan Freeman and Jane Alexander in the credits, I expect quality. To see every actress in the film, except Jane, displaying breasts and nether regions - it is unnecessary and took away from the film. By the way, you saw full on frontal female nudity - no males.

reply

[deleted]

No one wants to see the male anatomy on screen.

Like fruit flies to wanton boys, we are to the gods;
They kill us for their sport.

reply

[deleted]

Believe me, unless it's artistically necessary, no one needs or wants to see male anatomy on screen. It's just different with women.

Like fruit flies to wanton boys, we are to the gods;
They kill us for their sport.

reply

[deleted]

If you say it's sexist but I can assure you it's just better and not as distracting looking at a nake woman as opposed to a naked man.

Also, there really was no point in showing Billy Burke's penis in that alraedy perfect shot when he gets off the bed and when he's facing Radha Mitchell.

We saw the man naked anyway, even his backside. Just not his penis.

Like fruit flies to wanton boys, we are to the gods;
They kill us for their sport.

reply

[deleted]

The camera was in the distance to see the two arguing so we saw her entire body not for the sake of seeing her entire body. It was an artistic decision just like cutting Burke at the waist.

Straight females won;t care which one way. No one cares to see male anatomy.

It's really not a male thing. The male directed "Eastern Promises" showed Viggo Mortensen's penis.

Like fruit flies to wanton boys, we are to the gods;
They kill us for their sport.

reply

Yes it's sexist, yes it's a double standard, but female nudity attracts a lower censorship rating than male nudity. As a matter of fact you'd be very lucky to get anything less than an "X" rating for male full frontal nudity.

reply

Then where's the X rating for "Eastern Promises" which was also ultra violent

Like fruit flies to wanton boys, we are to the gods;
They kill us for their sport.

reply

[deleted]

This is so ridiculous. Society views the penis as worth more than a female anything. . . breast, vagina. . . directors can show a woman full frontal because, well, who cares? But a MAN'S PENIS? Oh the horrors! No, no, we mustn't see a man's penis. . . besides, women don't want to see such things! They don't like sex anyway. . . they just want to lay there in the dark and do their duty. . . they don't actually LIKE such things. . . Oh, wait, let's justify all this by saying we are just appreciating the beauty of the female body. . . for art . . . and, when you literally say, Uh, no,I actually would like to see male full frontal nudity, I'll point out that you really don't know what you want. . . blah, ridiculous.

reply

Not ridiculous. If you women were nicer about penises and didn't mock them, then maybe things would be different.

Director couldn't afford to have a giggle moment during a serious scene like that.

reply

Female nudity in mainstream cinema rarely actually shows any genitalia, just the pubic hair which normally masks what is largely hidden away anyway. As far as I know, the female nude scenes don't feature open-legged, shaven close-ups of vaginas, just hair. It is really difficult to do the same for men, it's either cock and balls or nothing.

I think it's fair to say that including those objects WILL distract from anything else that's going on in a movie, people will say/think 'He's got a big/small/odd-looking one' whereas for women, what? 'She could do with a trim'? Unlikely because they will almost all have had one.

It's just not the same.

reply

Good points. You aren't actually showing any genitalia!!

Radha did have some pubes so I hear. Good on her

reply

I'm surprised that no posts have presented an obvious reason that a man's penis is seldom shown in these sex scenes. Unlike female "full frontal nudity", that of the male displays quite clearly, through erection or lack thereof, the true emotional involvement of the actor. Thus, in many situations, the resulting visual display could be quite embarrassing to the actor and actress (and probably many others on the set) if discrete coverage were not employed.

reply

You posted the exact same message on Alexa's board

You also went through every thread on the Stargate Atlantis board where Jewel Staite or Dr Keller were mentioned in the title and howled about people criticising Dr Keller and gave lectures about what a great and awesome actress Jewel is (she is, when she's given a well-written character)

BTW, Jewel was to have a topless scene in The Tribe before they recast all but one actor and reshot the movie as The Lost Tribe, I guess you've lost respect for her too?

reply

It's kinda funny. You all know there's a difference between "Sex Scenes" and "Nude Scenes," right? No one yet has discussed the "Sex Scenes" in the film. I haven't seen the film, yet I think most of us want to know exactly why this film is rated R for Strong Sexual Content. So, to clarify what the spirit of this post is really about: how explicit are the sex scenes?

reply

1 or 2 of the sex scenes could easily be considered soft-core porn. Similar to what you would watch on HBO or Skinamax

"Dear Diary, Jackpot"-Quagmire

reply

Yeah.

reply