Napoleon Dynamite has caught a lot of slack and criticism because all the scene kids latched onto it and we were beaten over the head with it's indie-ness and how "cool" the film was and now its cool to hate that film, but I saw it the week it came out, before anyone new what the eff it was and it unique, quirky, subtly hilarious and witty. You could tell the writer was a child of the 80's/90's. I loved the homage it paid to that era. It deserved the attention and love it got initially because it was unique. Not to say the team responsible for ND had reinvented the wheel, or done something that no one else had done, but they did create a film that defied all modern conventions and went against the mainstream "grain" and was successful in spite of.
Humble Pie is NOT Napoleon Dynamite. That style of film has become tired and trite. It's not original. It's not unique. It's not quirky. Once ND was successful everyone wanted to mimic it's storytelling. Humble Pie aspires to be ND, but fails. It tries to use the same formula with the odd looking extras, a la the-farmers-with-speech-impediments, whom can't act and the fact that this is purely intentional to lend to the aesthetic of awkward "real" people. It's not funny anymore. I thought the story was very contrived, very forced. The characters didn't feel organic, but rather felt like stiff, generic stereotypes.
We live in an age where you can receive praise for a work if you slap the big ole stamp of "indie" on it. Throw in some quirky music and awkward interactions and people will eat it up. I do believe a movie like this can still be heartwarming, funny, witty, charming and a whole slew of other adjectives, but this one was not.
reply
share