Re tvs per household- I really don’t know how they could come to a good number for this. If you only look at tvs purchased that year, you miss out on the millions that didn’t buy one that year, but still have one or more in the house. If tvs are purchased for a business it isn’t always obvious, especially if it is a small business and they only buy one, say for their lobby, on a personal credit card. Even sometimes if they’re purchased for a larger business it can show up as personal. I know several years ago my dad bought 3 or 4 tvs for the place he works on his personal card and then had the place reimburse him, so that didn’t look like a business purchase, because yes there are a lot of US households with multiple tvs.
I AM using Nielsen’s numbers. I used the reported numbers I found to come up with the number of people without a tv and the percentage of the population with Nielsen boxes. Yes, I would welcome more people having input as to what shows get renewed and what gets axed. The different channels over here are always happy to claim we have the number one show in this slot, or the best whatever, and x number of millions of people tuned into see this show. No, I’m sorry when you’re polling 50,000 people out of 296.8 million, I have a hard time believing any claim that says millions are watching, or sorry we’re cancelling because Nielsen says under a million are watching. Start polling a real representative portion of the population and then those millions claims are more believable. Pretty much anyone who has enjoyed a show with a plot and not just “reality” shows complains about Nielsen and how outdated it is, so it isn’t just a small group. There are shows that have been cancelled that I didn’t understand the appeal of at all, but it was clear from an online fan presence that there were a lot of people that did like it.
Re WSJ article ‘Comcast Seeks to Harness Trove of TV Data’- They are collecting the data anyway, then this is what needs to be used to figure out real viewing figures. It may be only one company, but it is around 12 million people spread out over the whole US. Only about 4% of tv viewers, but way better than Nielsen’s current less than 2 hundredths of a percent!
TV networks also are interested in using data to evaluate their programming--to assess, for instance, whether a show with a small audience is worth keeping on the air because it has an avid group of return viewers.
Definitely for this reason. Though, wonder what is considered small? Just read your comments under the link. I think you hit it with the show being cheap vs expensive to make. “Reality” tv is such a mainstay because it is so cheap to make in comparison to a real tv show. Some of the small audience shows might also be sci-fi shows, and sci-fi fans can be Very Devoted to their fandoms, watching, buying merchandise, etc, which in the long run may pay more than a new show that you don’t know if people will respond to or that might not bring in any revenue other than ad revenue.
Also, if a show has a small, loyal viewership, at least those people are coming back to your channel every week, and may stick around to watch whatever is on after. It may also be a way to judge whether to give the show a real final season or just cancel it. People get pissed when their shows don’t get real endings, and can create a lot of negative online feelings towards the channel. Would be interesting to see how often those feelings translate into action by the consumers. I’ve seen plenty of times people threatening to never watch that channel again, but wonder how long it actually takes for them to go back? Especially if it is a niche channel? Then there are just people that might only watch one show on a particular channel, and when the show ends, they never watch that channel just because there isn’t anything else they consider interesting.
I’ve had 11 shows end/cancelled; 3 shows are currently questionable to return, and 1 show that I’ve never been devoted to, but watched now and again, where my favourite character is leaving at the end of the season. There are two channels that I never watch now that the shows I watched on there were cancelled. Not in any sort of protest, but on one the show was the only reason I turned into that channel ever, and the other channel has changed the type of shows they air just enough that I have no interest. I will say with the second channel I know some of their newer stuff is a lot cheaper to have than the shows I used to watch.
I don’t think I’m a typical viewer, in that I generally only watch tv when I know something is on that I want to watch instead of surfing to find something else. I will say though that with social media, I’ve gotten even more concise about when I watch. I still tend to find new shows from ads I see running while I’m watching tv, but I use the internet to keep track of when that show comes back on, and generally won’
Steve Hasker, Nielsen's global president, plays down the competitive threat set-top box data poses to Nielsen. "We think it has a role in stabilizing the ratings, but only...when used in combination with panel information" like Nielsen's, which provides key demographic insights, such as viewers' age and gender, he said.
In recent months, Comcast rebuffed an offer from TV-ratings specialist Nielsen, which was willing to pay roughly $100 million for an exclusive license to the data[…]
And these bits clearly say to me that Nielsen knows it’s outdated and should be frightened by this.
Re smart TV listening to conversations- There was an issue similar to this with Xbox One. Don’t remember if it was prior to release or after, and something about the military banning the machines in certain deployment areas because of it or something like that. There was also an issue that service members were complaining about with the Xbox One in regards to games, or maybe it was the consul, locking into whatever region it was originally turned on/played in. So if a family member purchased a game and sent it to a deployed soldier in say Iraq, the soldier played it in Iraq, when the soldier got home the game wouldn’t work. Don’t know if that was ever fixed or not.
This makes me think I need to check our newest tv. Wonder if it is even possible to find a not ‘smart’ tv anymore. The only up side to them that I can see is if you have a Netflix, Amazon Plus, Hulu, etc. account where you can get it directly to the tv without an extra box. I’d happily have the extra box for the tv to not have the built in listening device. The ones that creep me out even more are the ones with the webcams built in. Our new tv has one, but at least it is this little thing on to of the tv that you can tilt back towards the ceiling or wall; at least if it gets hacked the photos/vids off of it won’t be interesting. I don’t understand having webcams in tvs. What was wrong with using a computer if you wanted to vid call someone? Microphones, at least, I can see people complaining about how long it takes to input a program name with the on-screen keyboard, so the companies came up with voice command. The article mentioned a button has to be pushed for the commands to be followed. I wonder how often the sounds are being collected even when the button isn’t being pushed.
Re next ep promos- don’t know who comes up with them. Showing some of the suspenseful moments is supposed to make people want to tune in to see what happens. Does suck when they give spoilers away. I think maybe the networks are the ones that do the promos, because I think I saw an interview or maybe it was on commentary for something where a producer or director was complaining how the ep was spoiled when it aired because of the promo. Wish I could remember what show that was for. Don’t think it was one I watched. So the blurb probably came out of either SD or NY Comic-con.
The ones I don’t like are where they try to create suspense out of nothing. The classic example I have of this is growing up I watched a show called Walker, Texas Ranger. In one of their promos, they had suspenseful music going while flashing through brief clips of the characters with an overly dramatic voice saying, ‘Next week, one of these rangers will fall.’ The idea being that one of them would get killed in the line of duty. Tuned into the new ep, one got shot all right, and fell onto their back, but was up five seconds later showing that they had a bullet proof vest on. That is when a show is desperate for a promo.
I do find any promo better than none. The channel over here Syfy, tends to pick up shows from other markets, primarily Britain and Canada. Whenever one of those shows is in its last season, instead of getting a promo for every ep, the most Syfy will do is show a general trailer after the ep airs, which is basically a reminder that the show will be on again in a week. When it gets down to like the last three eps they’ll put a voice over on saying only x number to go. (Hhmm. More evidence that channel is responsible for weekly promos. Would think if people involved with show were doing promos, even though it’s the last series they’d try to do it justice instead of, oh, yeah, don’t forget it will be on again next week.)
Re #showname- yes, tweeting during the show to me = stupid. I always find it a bit of a joke when stars tweet along with a show’s ep. It might be fine for them since they know what is going on, but it doesn’t make any sense to me to encourage people to tweet instead of actually watching the show. Sort of going along with that, I also don’t get people who record themselves while their watching a show and then post the vid on YT as a reaction to the ep. Like I’ve seen a bunch of them for the Game of Thrones’ Red Wedding scene, or the Reichenbach Falls ep of Sherlock, etc. Understand even less why anybody watches them. If it was some kind of analysis, maybe, maybe, might understand, but just someone(s) having an overdramatic response to a tv ep? Why?
Re Chinese in Australia- I’m not talking about them settling there for any length of time, but there is a theory, think it is a decade or two old by now, that the Chinese sailed to the Americas several years prior to Columbus. They didn’t stay or colonize or anything. Since they did that with America, I would assume that they would have had the technology at the time to get down to Australia. Not saying that the Chinese are Aboriginal ancestors. But if the researchers think the guy died 700 years ago, in the 1300s, the Chinese could have visited and decided not to stay, but could have gotten into some conflicts with locals, killing some with metal weapons before leaving.
Re grave robbers- sorry about the messy grammar. Yes, I think grave robbing still exists because people get buried with their valuables. No point in doing all that digging if at the bottom is just a rotting corpse. Well, unless you can find someone to buy the corpse, but there isn’t quite the market for that that there once was. No scabs or wounds about grandfather getting buried with watch or suit. I just don’t understand burying a person with nice things. If it was a religion that thought you had to bring everything with you to the afterlife, I would understand; for everyone else, I don’t understand putting nice things in with a corpse that is just going to ruin them. Like I said before, donate the nice stuff and bury the person in rags. Same if you’re going to cremate.
Re Hunters & Collectors ‘Holy Grail’- Don’t think I would have heard the More Than A Feeling bit if you hadn’t pointed it out.
Re “pick to the ear”- yeah, too sharp sounding. Under nails on chalkboard level, but tempted to cover my ears.
Re cloud definition- I mean that the server is owned by a company other than the one(s) storing the data on it. Like if I owned a company, but instead of buying my own servers, I primarily used something like iCloud to store the data. In this case my company wouldn’t directly control the servers that our data was stored on. I really think that cloud servers are disasters waiting to happen, more so than the nude photo leaks.
Re pop culture refs- my way back tends to end in the mid-90s unless it is a show or movie I’ve come across recently and gotten into. The only older stuff that I really remember watching are some Indian Jones and James Bond movies, and if there were any references in those they probably went over my head. There are modern day allusions that go over my head just because I don’t keep up with singers, actors, etc, much. There will be pockets of pop culture I’ll know, but a lot of it I don’t get why it’s popular in the first place, i.e. Kardashians, Bachelor/Bachelorette, Survivor, etc.
Re languages- I have an interest in learning languages. Not a real successful one, mind, but I try. Seem to pick up more random crap having to do with them than then being able to recall actual words. With English, though, my main interest area of history is the Middle Ages, right when a lot of these language changes were happening. If I’m reading the Great Vowel Shift Timeline right, we’ve lost at least 12 sounds as some merged into others. Wonder if spelling today would be easier if these different sounds were still around. At least when doing spelling tests (if they do them anymore) a teacher wouldn’t have to give a sentence to tell the kids which word was wanted, i.e knight vs night.
Re Siobahn- checked it before I wrote the last post. There are multiple spellings. Think some are just more popular than others.
Re 15 German Illness article- so the Germans just gave funny names to certain feelings? Or actually named certain feelings that English lumps under an overall umbrella? The second one listed, Föhnkrankheit seems like a change in pressure causing a person headaches – my mom gets those and we don’t live anywhere near Germany. Fernweh is more commonly known as wander lust, Putzfimmel sounds like someone with a cleaning OCD, 3 or 4 sound like minor depression caused either by being unhappy with the state or the world or yourself. Start looking at any language and you can find some interesting words to describe “ailments”.
Re Monty Python sketch- wonder how many takes that took? Recognize some real words in there, so maybe most of it meant something and that was how they did it. Still props to them.
Re Valley and Surfer- Surfer seems to include parts of Hawaii and Los Angeles, CA, partially up the west coast where surfing is decent; Valley Girl seems to be mostly the preppier areas around Los Angeles. So however you want to count that.
Re Aussie speech- To me it read like a teacher trying to make a bid for more communication classes to be taught, but done in a slightly satirical (?) way. Maybe a response piece to a conversation he had with a colleague at his University? I don’t understand why he brings America’s education system into this re our system teaching better communication skills. Never had to take a dedicated communications course through my entire schooling. There were a couple classes offered in grades 6 through 12, but the were strictly optional and seemed to be the last resort of the elective courses. Maybe the article writer just doesn’t like the Aussie accent? Didn’t listen to the podcast, but read the blog post you linked to. The blog guy and the guy from The Age article got into it a bit in the blog comments section. Can’t say I buy drunkenness affecting an accent so much that it would completely alter a nation’s accent. I would think that all the adults would have to be drunk all the time in order for it to alter the way the kids were speaking. Also, the article writer seems to forget that it has really only been recently that non-alcoholic drinks really became more mainstream and safer to drink.
Re Doctor Who- I think you may have the right idea in not investing too much into the lore of the show. Fans can argue until we’re dead about how many regenerations there should be and which Doctor fits in where in the Doctor’s overall lifespan, but in the end the writers and show runners are going to do whatever they want and just write something in to make it so. Die hard fans will undoubtedly argue about the legitimacies of the writers doing that, but to a degree, that is what makes sci-fi and fantasy fun- being able to pick at the details that make that world work. As long as it can stay civil. When writers start doing whatever they want it can get overly convoluted.
Re Top Gear reboot- have you heard that, including The Stig, there are going to be 7 presenters for the show? How the hell do you do have 7 presenters? And is the Stig going to talk now? That is just not right. Mentioned how they were having open auditions for the presenter job, which thought was a PR stunt more than anything, and what do you know. Only one of the new presenters was found through the open auditions, he’s British, and was already in the car review industry, and had tv and radio experience. Yeah, I’m sure average joe had a real chance of ever becoming a presenter. They also put American actor Matt LeBlanc on there. He’s supposed to be into cars, but just seems like a weird choice. BBC America re-hashed some of the Top Gear races and cut them so that LeBlanc did some camera bits in between segments (didn’t watch them) and ran the eps right before it was announce that he was going to be a presenter. Guess that was his audition.
Was looking to confirm the 7 presenters number, and some news stories popped up saying Evans has been a pain to work with and is causing trouble on the set. There was also a story where Top Gear was getting in trouble for doing donuts by a war memorial in London. Day before that there was a story that they had crashed a wedding. Seems like no matter what Top Gear is going to get bad press.
Re CHM Amazon show- the dollar amounts that keep getting thrown around are their salaries. It is the total that Amazon is investing into getting the show running and produced, so setting up a new company in charge of the show, offices and all that goes with setting those up, etc. Haven’t seen any info as to what the guy are actually getting paid per season or ep.
Re asthma- make sense to me. If you have bad bacteria in your mouth, as you breath and talk, it is constantly making its way further into your respiratory system. Too much and you start having problems.
Re C-section article- so scheduling when you want the baby removed is a bad thing? Shocking. I know there are medical reasons for C-section, and not sure where the trend is currently, but past few years I had seen stories how more and more women are opting to have deliveries via c-section so that it happens on their schedule instead of just letting nature take its course (and think this article is a couple years old, so her comments reflect what I had heard). I want to know how unborn babies have sterile guts, though. It has been caught on video of them swallowing fluid and urinating, plus however the nutrients coming across the placenta are processed. Not to mention amniotic fluid is toxic enough that it can kill the mother if gets in the blood stream. An infant can survive living in that, swallowing that, but the gut is sterile?
Re candies- The Smarties look like off brand M&Ms to me. You mention that regular M&Ms are too small for you because of how you eat them. Over here they brought out a Mega M&M. Rip off of the chocolate Smarties perhaps? Tried them once and didn’t care for them. There is a birthday cake variety now that I thought was pretty good. I’m just happy the US finally got crispy M&Ms back. They were introduced over here when I was in my early teens and then taken off the market. Whoever owns M&Ms (Mars I think) still had them out in Eastern Europe, but it wasn’t until about two years ago they were brought back
reply
share