It would have made more sense imo. Tiana doesn't really become a princess until the very end when she marries Naveen. Still love the movie though.
"Notice how I ride side saddle, it proves I'm a lady of quality." Witch Hazel
Yes and Yes!
We're on the same TWO pages :)
I agree, and it would have helped attract the boy demographic.
shareThe Frog Princess! It's even better than Shrek! šø
Frogger
It couldn't really be called 'the frog prince' because that's already a well/known story where the princess kisses the frog and he turns back into a prince. So quite a different story, although similar.
shareIt couldn't really be called 'the frog prince' because that's already a well/known story where the princess kisses the frog and he turns back into a prince. So quite a different story, although similar.
No, you're wrong. Disney (and other studios) have been retelling stories for years, and taking creative liberty while keeping the original title.
Agree OP especially since they both spent majority of the film as frogs.
shareI think The Frog Prince would've been a better name. But not The Frog Princess because that is a distinct Russian fairy tale. Speaking of which, how about a Russian princess?
share Speaking of which, how about a Russian princess?
Fox studios did Anastasia in 1997.
I realize that, but that wasn't Disney and I feel like Fox kind of missed the mark on that one.
shareI hated it too, but still: Disney probably wouldn't make an Anastasia film if a pretty prominent animated feature has already been made of her.
shareWell it wouldn't have to Anastasia; it could be any other Slavic fairy tale. It could look beautiful... here is a Russian animated fairy tale:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nY6sI3muOjc
I have to agree. Couldāve just called it The Frog Prince. Wouldāve avoided the whole āgirl movieā stereotype that this movie is accused of. I wish it didnāt come to that but it does.
share