MovieChat Forums > Broken English (2008) Discussion > Boring and directionless

Boring and directionless


I saw "Broken English" for FREE last night at a test screening...and I feel like I want my money back! I would also like back the 90 minutes of my life that I could have spent doing something more entertaining, like watching the grass die.

I usually like Parker Posey's films (she's great in all the Christopher Guest stuff!), but, beyond a few promising scenes at the beginning, this film was just directionless, underdeveloped, and, at only 90 minutes, seemed to drag (and drag) unmercifully. I can quite honestly can think of few films with worse pacing than this one. There are several scenes that could be cut from the film entirely without any damage to the (already uninvolving) plot.

Avoid this one...even for free.

JM

reply


Here's where I'm at: I read the rave (!) reviews, including the L.A.Times,
saw the cast and director (Cassavetes does ring with charm)and saw it
with a friend. After a few promising scenes, it began to play like a
second-rate "Sex and the City" episode. I sort of liked the first half,
but by the time she flew to Paris, I was extremely bored. The writing
here is extremely confusing, clumsy and feels tacked on.

We thought it was "okay" when we left the theatre, but with each passing
day, I can barely remember scenes, as they were so redundant.

*Spoiler*: The ending was absurd. She was clearly an alcoholic,
drug-dependent woman, the French guy someone who would clearly cheat
on her. And she had no money, really no identity, and no hope at the
end. Yet it was supposed to be a "happy ending." Because she found
the guy in Paris. Right.

Not as angry in my review as you are, but no, this movie disappointed.

reply

She was clearly an alcoholic, drug-dependent woman, the French guy someone who would clearly cheat on her. And she had no money, really no identity, and no hope at the end. Yet it was supposed to be a "happy ending." Because she found the guy in Paris. Right.

Absolutely off-mark analysis. She is not an alcoholic, she is a person suffering from depression who drowns her miseries in cynicism, cigarettes and wine. The "French guy" displays no attributes whatsoever that tell you he would cheat on her. In fact, he is the only one who can help her at the precise moment she needs someone. He is very upfront and clear with her about whether or not they will see other people (in the bathtub). She had no money because she worked and lived in Manhattan in a low-paying job she didn't like, and she took a risk for once, and a stand, without anything to back her up. She did this because she needed to feel alive, like herself, again, after being deadened by a dead-end job and life for so long. And you say she had no real identity? We really saw two different films. She goes looking for a man and realizes that he is not, after all, what she was looking for. It is PRECISELY at that time that he re-appears. As they say, when the student is ready, the teacher appears. If he had stayed in New York it would never have worked out because she was not secure in her own skin or identity, and had self-worth issues. When she becomes subtly liberated in Paris though social interaction with genuinely nice guys and feels a touch of independence and self-worth, she is ready to be in love. But not until then. And again, regarding your certainty that the "French guy" would cheat on her, you slept through the last five minutes of the film. The expressions on his face are priceless. When he realizes that she has been in Paris and not even called him, he is deeply hurt. And he says to her, "I cared so much for you. And I waited. And I never heard from you." He is clearly wounded and sad, thinking that she has no place for him in her life. If you saw him as a cheater I can only assume you visited your own scenarios about European men on him because he had a degree of style, confidence and sexiness. If you watched closely how he behaved when she had her anxiety attack, you would never think he was the cheating kind and see how he truly felt for her.

You really missed all of these subtleties. I'm sorry, but your assessment is remarkably shallow.


I am free. But life is so cheap.

reply

[deleted]

i agree with you entirely -- i thought the scene right after her encounter with the fortune teller completely denied the emotional power of that event and i felt so short-changed!

reply

I totally agree with you, RTprod. I love this film very much. :D

reply

I saw this movie with my dad, and that was all wrong. I didn't appreciate the premature kissing that happened between Parker and "the actor." Nor did I really enjoy the easy-to-bed attitude this woman had. It just seems so lame how a woman can be young and beautiful AND have a cool job, but still be unhappy. However, my discomfort didn't come from Dad being there, 'cause he knocked out about 10 minutes into the movie.

I simply didn't like too much of this movie for several reasons. One: there was hardly any action. And, yes, the pace was slightly off. Secondly, Parker's character... I wasn't sure... Is it the way she is? the way she acts? or, was this the character? ... Mopey and sooooooo clueless! Why does a workingwoman have to be so desperate to find romance? What I think I mean to say is, Parker's character wasn't so interesting, besides her designer clothes and smoky makeup once you discover she behaves like a horny 13-year-old around men and then ends up crying about how she's still single the next morning. Easy, I thought. That's the problem with today's women: we're giving it up for free. Too easy!

I really liked her best friend and her mom. I think the movie should have been more about the best friend, played by Drea de Matteo. Now she was interesting.

PS That French guy... NOT HOT!

reply

I completely disagree. I loved this movie b/c its soo real. I saw myself in her b/c I am exactly the same as her (Minus the anxiety attacks)

I am single, attractive, and succesful yet I cant seem to ever stick in a relationship. Either men cheat or it just never lasts. Its hard and I sumtimes wonder 2myself what it is that I do wrong and this movie made me realize a few things about myself. I also give in to temptation with men as well.

You didnt like this movie becuz u dont relate 2 it which is good, I wish I didnt but I do. I have her same problems. She isnt acting like a 13 year old horny girl...she is giving into temptationt hat is hard 2 resist. Trust me I know. You may feel different b/c everyone feels different. It all depends on where we are from and how we are raised and our different societies.

This is one of my fave movies becuz it did sumthing RARELY any movies do, it taught me sumthing about myself!!









"I am McLovin"

reply

I disagree. I thought it was a really subtle film with great character evolution. There isn't a rollicking plot driving it along, but it does a beautiful job with a thin story and really well-realized characters. You can read my full review at www.IndieCliche.com.

Pete

reply

I didn't find it boring and I thought the directionless was on par with her character who was "directionless" and looking, which was the point of the whole movie. To me it definitely qualifies as an emotional art movie like the French movie entitled "Gabrielle", which I will admit had stronger acting. This movie was a bit lighter and youthful than "Gabrielle". Plus I do agree that because of the slow nature of this movie it's not going to break any movie attending records. Though all in all I enjoyed it and don't feel it was a waste of time or money on my part!


Life happens while your making plans...

reply

This was beyond boring, I fast-forwarded through more than half of the movie. It had neither the wit nor the charm of "Sex and the City." The characters were undeveloped and cliche. The whole movie just seemed like a hodge-podge of clips. A complete mess. Hopefully, no one paid to see this.

reply

I sat through this movie 3 times, determined by the second time to watch it and feel asleep through it both times... This never happens to me. Enough said.

reply

For gods sake, it seems like most of you had no business watching this film in the first place. I could not disagree more with most of you. This film was exceptionally REAL and exactly what the daughter of John Cassavettes was after. I thought the dialoge was "refreshingly" accurate. I bought every minute, matter of fact am going to tear it out of it's return Netflix envelope and watch it a second time before sending it back.

Posey was a revelation. Mature, neurotic and soulful (not one of her usually insane or erratic characters.) She deserves an Indy Ocscar for this. The movie had me from the opening scene on...

If you like films in the vein of "Walking and Talking" and the like, you'll love this one! Don't listen to anyone here. The first nut on here saw it for free (what does that tell you?)

reply

It seems like no one else sees--- she must have a love affair with herself first..that is what the older french woman and the older french man is tellig her... the random meetings with those two people are so significant to her. And the when she has a totally serindipidpus (sp??) with Julian at the end...PERFECT! Perhaps American audiences cannot understand..it is not too tidy.

reply

That's the thing, though...none of the people that she met seemed like real people. The encounters all seemed so romanticized and/or cartoonish. Also, what did she and the french dude actually have in common? It wreaked of company for the sake of not being alone rather than an actual connection.

reply

I agree--Parker Posey was so vunerable in this role! Everyone can identify with these emotions! At this point in my life - I want to go to Paris! Or anywhere to meet the two older people she "talked" to...we should all be so lucky...merci.

reply

Oui,

And, I loved the opening scene of her getting ready for the party (the music was wonderful too.) See this film!

reply

I just saw "Broken English" and I really loved it. I enjoyed the story. It is so obvious that the movie was written and directed by a woman, because she manages to catch so well the anxiety, the hesitation, the ups and downs of women... and Parker Posey plays Sara so intensely that at moments I just thought it was herself who sufferred, not the character.
The happy ending might seem a bit untrue. Though it leaves me with a smile.

reply

I went from thinking this film would be awesome to doubting it completely, then finally watched it and absolutely loved it. I think it wasn't directionless and boring at all. I was immediately interested in the film because it bore several similarities to my own life. It brought hope to me, not in the cliche sense that there is a night in shining armor out there, but that there is the unexpected. Parker Posey's character was a beautiful yet, not truly astounding person who opened up herself too quickly and find a lot of disappointment in doing so. I think this was the best performance of Posey's and she did an incredible job. If you seek a non-typical, beautiful story about self-discovery and love, then here it is.

reply

I had severl problems with this film. I thought it started out with a bang, funny, a bit of wit and good characterization. Then i started to feel like the music did not fit the film, felt jarring. Then i realized the director did not know what film she was making. The biggest problem with the film was the lack of a real cohesive tone. It never set up a real tone for viewing, continualy bouncing back and forth as a hodge podge of scenes from a sad comedy via sideways about a miserable sad depresed character, to an indie sex in the city comedy, to a find yourself inspirational drama, and it just kept flipping with each scene making the previous scene before it more derivative . . . etc . . etc. . .etc Just way way way too jumbled. A tone should have been set, scenes needed to feel more fluid instead of a bunch of scenes with good acting poorly cut together and continualy bounced totally changing pace, theme and tone too much. For example, the fortune teller scene, seemed sad sincere, then hokey and desperate, then boom the big glasses and casting off a curse dialogue in the beauty parlor completely ruined that scene, and still stand as one of the most pointless 5 minuts of any film i can remember.

I love Parker Posey and she did her best, and her performance along with the gret casting overall is the only redeemable feature of the film, but just not enough to fix a filmakers daughters inability to write a cohesive screenplay, and film a solid film. Zoe needs to take lessons from Coppola's daughter, just because daddy makes films, it does not mean you can. Coppola can Cassavetes proves in this she cant, at least not yet.

As it stands this is one of the weaker films from 2007's Sundance Festival, some good acting, but a budding filmaker with too many ideas and not enough organization for those ideas and themes just makes for poor filmaking.

reply