MovieChat Forums > America: Freedom to Fascism (2006) Discussion > Netflix Removed this Film From Its Libra...

Netflix Removed this Film From Its Library


America: Freedom to Fascism has been removed from your Queue. We no longer offer this movie for rental. We apologize for the inconvenience and hope you find many other movies to enjoy at Netflix.

Now from what I can tell this is a nutty right-wing/libertarian film on the Federal Reserve. I have no idea why I added it to my queue, and it has probably languished in the low 200s for months but... I am slightly upset they removed it. Anyone know why? Google has not been forthcoming w/ answers.

reply

yeah, i noticed that this morning as well but after I went back on netflix and typed it in, it showed up again. I moved it to the top of my queue just in case they decide to do it again. It may be a bit extreme but who knows

reply

[deleted]

"Now from what I can tell this is a nutty right-wing/libertarian film on the Federal Reserve."

I have to join with drekula in asking the question, why do you feel you have to prejudice the film with the label "nutty"?

This is a far too-common phenomenon which is DESTROYING not only America, but Western Civilization. This result is what total government control of the school system, and the mainstream media being in the hands of but a few corporations, have done.

Since YOU didn't "learn" this in school, since YOU didn't hear this information from CBS or CNN, then it must be "nutty". This is AUTHORITARIANISM. Whatever "official sources" tell you is normal, is normal, good and proper, and whatever "they" tell you is "nutty".

At least you plan on watching it, as "nutty" as it may be. And I just checked, the movie is still in the Netflix database.

reply

Nice straw man argument there, movielover35.

If someone describes this movie as "nutty", than that means they accept everything the govt/CBS/CNN tells them. And by doing so, they are indirectly responsible for the collapse of Western Civilization. Can you be any more shrill?

I certainly don't believe "whatever official sources tell me is normal, is normal", but that doesn't mean I can't view this movie as "nutty". Reasonable people can disagree.



______________________________________
I don't mess around. That's who I am.

reply

"Nice straw man argument there, movielover35.

If someone describes this movie as "nutty", than that means they accept everything the govt/CBS/CNN tells them. And by doing so, they are indirectly responsible for the collapse of Western Civilization. Can you be any more shrill?

I certainly don't believe "whatever official sources tell me is normal, is normal", but that doesn't mean I can't view this movie as "nutty". Reasonable people can disagree."


1. Was I talking to you?

2. It WASN'T a straw man argument, because when the OP used the word "nutty" to describe a video, a conglomeration of information they haven't even seen yet, they are exhibiting the EXACT behavior I describe. That of allowing OTHERS, especially "authority figures", who in reality are nothing but people with certain agendas, to shape their world-view for them, and in advance. The utterance of that word, BEFORE they have even seen the video, proves my point!

3. A reasonable person would WATCH the VIDEO first.
4. A reasonable person wouldn't call ANYTHING "nutty" except peanut butter.
5. To be consistent, the OP should also call the Constitution "nutty" because it is a libertarian document, forged by "nutty" libertarians like James Madison.

reply

I watched it. It was quite nutty.

reply

Then keep paying them taxes and enjoy your "freedoms".

reply

You tax shill. You can try auditing a Panamanian IBC, but it can't be done.

Paying income tax is voluntary, but if you just refuse to file, you could be involved in a legal battle that can ruin your life, even if you turn out to be in the right.

Thankfully, there is more than one way to skin a cat.

Step 1. Set up a Panamanian foundation - use a law firm to set up a Director, Treasurer and Secretary. They will issue undated letters of resignation for your security. Make yourself the primary beneficiary. Beneficiaries are often unaware of their status, particularly if the foundation is being used to manage assets designed to be passed to heirs at the death of the primary beneficiary.

Step 2. Use the foundation to establish an IBC. The Foundation holds all the shares of the IBC.

Step 3. Employ yourself through the IBC. Pay yourself just enough to survive. Only that money will be subject to income tax. Pay your office expenses through the IBC - office costs, utilities, insurance, vehicle expenses and leasing, etc.

The money going into the IBC is not able to be taxed, since it is untaxable foreign income in Panama, and is unrelated to a US entity except for the small amount you pay yourself. The IBC is not subject to audits or scrutiny since it is owned by a foundation, not a US citizen, and you have full control of both entities without being an owner or controller in the documentation of either.

Your IBC builds up capital which you can convert to commodity investments, shares, starting new companies etc. You can be sent on business trips and travel the world tax-free etc. One day the structure will be self-sustaining.

Eventually you can quit your job and ex-patriate. Go travelling. flip your mid-digit to jealous *beep* who used to run your life. Non-US citizens can earn as much as they like without paying income tax so long as they don't spend more than three months in any one jurisdiction. Visit four or five places a year, stay a couple of months and move on, even if you are just crossing a border in Europe. There are many places where you can move 10km down the road and be in another tax jurisdiction, or if you want you can move across the world. Taxation can be a lot more expensive than travel. Pay yourself as much as you like as a non-US tourist/businessperson and get it tax-free.

Result: You reduce your income tax to a minimum. Your earnings are held by the IBC which pays your expenses and your tiny wage until you can afford to retire (and with lower tax, you can do it much sooner) and travel the world.

This allows you to avoid any risks associated with potential court proceedings as shown in this film, and enables you to retain the bulk of your income, invest it, and retire early to a jetsetting lifestyle. Isn't that what its all about?? Who wants to be involved with tax-law and guys raiding your home and business?


reply

Well, it looks like these responses. I must agree with the poster above who called movielover shrill and uncharitable. And now I will reply for him/her as s/he replied for me:

"1. Was I talking to you?"

Immaterial. Your clumsy attempt to distract from an all-too wounding argument is noted.

2. It WASN'T a straw man argument, because when the OP used the word "nutty" to describe a video, a conglomeration of information they haven't even seen yet, they are exhibiting the EXACT behavior I describe. That of allowing OTHERS, especially "authority figures", who in reality are nothing but people with certain agendas, to shape their world-view for them, and in advance. The utterance of that word, BEFORE they have even seen the video, proves my point!


A "conglomeration of information"? This is worse than bad writing; it's bad, self-important writing. I think I was rather up front about making a tentative judgment. I have not seen Expelled yet either and I have the impression that it's nutty. I have not met you, but these posts of yours lead me to believe you are a bit nutty. And an ideologue.

3. A reasonable person would WATCH the VIDEO first.


Again, you're failing to distinguish tentative from final judgments. I think my original post makes it clear that I'm interested in the video.

4. A reasonable person wouldn't call ANYTHING "nutty" except peanut butter.


Well that's just plain ridiculous. I mean, nutty.

5. To be consistent, the OP should also call the Constitution "nutty" because it is a libertarian document, forged by "nutty" libertarians like James Madison.


This is quite shrill. And desperate. The Articles of Confederation was a more libertarian document, and a failure. Madison was a Federalist aligned with the likes of Alexander Hamilton, but in any case this is just another attempt by libertarians to claim the Founding Fathers in broad strokes. The Federal Reserve is exactly the type of elitist institution I can see Hamilton favoring. I am not sure about Madison, but that underscores an important point: the Founders of this country had varied views and they made mistakes.

I do want to briefly address a comment or two from your previous post:

Since YOU didn't "learn" this in school, since YOU didn't hear this information from CBS or CNN, then it must be "nutty".


Isn't it funny how YOU criticized ME for making prejudgments?

This is AUTHORITARIANISM. Whatever "official sources" tell you is normal, is normal, good and proper, and whatever "they" tell you is "nutty".


This is funny after your little impromptu summoning of the Constitution, which is sorta, kinda the ultimate official document, as it lays down the law of the land. I take an interest in challenging the mainstream media, the Federal Reserve, and yes the Constitution, however, I tend to "conglomerate" with the marginalized, nutty left-wing types (say, Noam Chomsky, Alexander Cockburn, the good folks from FAIR and so forth).

Oh, and libertarians are rather nutty.

reply