Well, it looks like these responses. I must agree with the poster above who called movielover shrill and uncharitable. And now I will reply for him/her as s/he replied for me:
"1. Was I talking to you?"
Immaterial. Your clumsy attempt to distract from an all-too wounding argument is noted.
2. It WASN'T a straw man argument, because when the OP used the word "nutty" to describe a video, a conglomeration of information they haven't even seen yet, they are exhibiting the EXACT behavior I describe. That of allowing OTHERS, especially "authority figures", who in reality are nothing but people with certain agendas, to shape their world-view for them, and in advance. The utterance of that word, BEFORE they have even seen the video, proves my point!
A "conglomeration of information"? This is worse than bad writing; it's bad, self-important writing. I think I was rather up front about making a tentative judgment. I have not seen
Expelled yet either and I have the impression that it's nutty. I have not met you, but these posts of yours lead me to believe you are a bit nutty. And an ideologue.
3. A reasonable person would WATCH the VIDEO first.
Again, you're failing to distinguish tentative from final judgments. I think my original post makes it clear that I'm interested in the video.
4. A reasonable person wouldn't call ANYTHING "nutty" except peanut butter.
Well that's just plain ridiculous. I mean, nutty.
5. To be consistent, the OP should also call the Constitution "nutty" because it is a libertarian document, forged by "nutty" libertarians like James Madison.
This is
quite shrill. And desperate. The Articles of Confederation was a more libertarian document, and a failure. Madison was a Federalist aligned with the likes of Alexander Hamilton, but in any case this is just another attempt by libertarians to claim the Founding Fathers in broad strokes. The Federal Reserve is exactly the type of elitist institution I can see Hamilton favoring. I am not sure about Madison, but that underscores an important point: the Founders of this country had varied views and they made mistakes.
I do want to briefly address a comment or two from your previous post:
Since YOU didn't "learn" this in school, since YOU didn't hear this information from CBS or CNN, then it must be "nutty".
Isn't it funny how YOU criticized ME for making prejudgments?
This is AUTHORITARIANISM. Whatever "official sources" tell you is normal, is normal, good and proper, and whatever "they" tell you is "nutty".
This is funny after your little impromptu summoning of the Constitution, which is sorta, kinda the ultimate official document, as it lays down the law of the land. I take an interest in challenging the mainstream media, the Federal Reserve, and yes the Constitution, however, I tend to "conglomerate" with the marginalized, nutty left-wing types (say, Noam Chomsky, Alexander Cockburn, the good folks from FAIR and so forth).
Oh, and libertarians are rather nutty.
reply
share