MovieChat Forums > Top Chef (2006) Discussion > John tesar is mentally ill.

John tesar is mentally ill.


John Tesar has a serious problem. He cannot work with others. Probably there are only certain scenarios in a restaurant where he succeeds. I can imagine the main scenario is where he is in charge and everyone does exactly what he says, right or wrong. They cover up for any of his lapses; and there are several people under him who are fantastic and carry the ball without it being obvious so he feels like he is in charge. He should not do a cooking show because his personality is not suited to it at all and he just ruins it for everyone else.

reply

I guess all his "therapy" didn't change who he is at his core! For one of the oldest contestants, he sure acts the most like a child (other than Katsuji and Emily of course).

You are right, he probably hires exceptional staff to make up for his incompetence.

reply

Who wants to work with him; even for double? The man is delusional; actually getting busted telling untruths about what went on in the kitchen! It's like he doesn't realize everything's being taped and he can't get away with "passing the buck" as he normally does on a regular basis in private life!  

- http://fiero4251.blogspot.com/2011/06/top-chef-entry-for-1107-on.html -

- - http://www.childrenofrassilon.com/fiero425.html - - homepage

reply

I can't understand why he didn't go home unless it's for drama. He made the worst dish that everyone hated, he was the one that was the most unorganized, didn't do his job well, yet he's still there. Anyone else making those same mistakes would've been gone.

Maybe they really are supporting the mentally ill. Lol

reply

[deleted]

Katsuji was much more to blame, such a selfish jerk.

reply

Katsuji has a big mouth, but he didn't make John make that bad pimento cheese crab crap and he didn't make John screw up his executive chef job. Katsuji went home because of is big mouth or they wanted to see more of John's crappy attitude.

They both were selfish jerks.

reply

Well when perception meets ‘reality’ in the edit, I’m probably gonna have to side with the judges and John on this one. I always assume earwigs, producer input, viewing of clips, the planning, and actual cook before judging. They probably saw more than us.

Katsuji was 1st choice, picked the team and with Casey took John over Emily. Katsuji passed on all but voluntarily being line on 3 dishes out of 6 total, becoming the de facto executive chef in practice. Now all must line up behind his work load plus their own dish, two of which had to be ready before service. They don’t send folks home for prep work alone, not for someone else’s dishes. They get the credit, not the cook. John was shown doing a lot.

“Cause you know, sometimes being an immigrant your voice gets lost.”
As if…
Prep begins:
John: It’s all about great food, great service, great friends, great execution.
Katsuji: I really don’t know about the friendship part.

Any sincerity for a team spirit was lost in a blink, even platitudes count for the moment at work. Point being professionals put aside personality on the job as a team. He’s relying on everyone to carry him for his ambitious risk. Creating tension guarantees a fail, I saw John pretty much keep his cool, even more than Casey.

It’s not viewer choice on personality, that’s the more other shows like any on FN or MasterChef US where they don’t even really cook their own dish and stuff is recreated for TV. Restaurant wars is harder to fake than quick-fires and eliminations.

Katsuji is consistently messy and was tossing stuff across the kitchen, folks get fired on the spot for that, it messes everyone else up. That was noted and it was him alone. John asked for a broom and swept up and mopped up. Bending over backward to maintain some order and calm. Now it seems he’s the mentally ill one, for anger management that seems to be working, tough unforgiving crowd here.
With constant baiting from Katsuji since the start of the show, openly confessing his dislike, interviews squarely aimed at John, it seems John has it more together than most. As far as I’m concerned John could have opened a can of cat food rather than canned crab and got a pass. None of the food on either team looked that great or was very technical.

Oh yes, the servers grabbing food out of order. Perhaps the producers cued the servers to grab stuff, for drama at the pass. Well anyway Katsuji said in interview, I would be *beeping* screaming right now ___ service. Now again, it’s John’s fault for not screaming. Sure there was chaos, not sure it was John who owned the pass and responsibility. John was the only one to apologize for the day as they left. Katsuji was fun at first, now I’m actually feeling sorry for John. I saw a different show I guess.

reply

Both are to blame. They created a southern comfort food restaurant serving mexican food. They both shouted and fought through the whole preps and service. Their restaurant was a health dept nightmare. Neither one gave an inch during service as in "Let's start over here, this is unprofessional, etc." No other chefs acted this way. If this was scripted for our enjoyment, the director can skip it next time.

I give no props to Katsugi but John should have been able to pull himself together if only to save face with his peers. He could not = mental illness.

reply

Plus the fact that he bragged ab out having opened about ii restaurants. If you're going to put yourself out there as an expert, you should show the experience in your actions, he didn't. But no one liked his dish. I think they kept him for drama.

reply

I cannot stand Katsuji. I think he is an ass but the judges liked 2 of the 3 dishes while Jon's dish was regarded by the judges as the worst. Not to mention he did an abysmal job as executive chef. They had nothing positive to say about him and for that reason I think Jon should have gone home. I really don't understand why he was given a reprieve.

reply

It just proves a chef can "talk their way off the show!" Katsuji made promises and wanted to shine! I think John's the one to blow it, but I sorta understand their coming back to Katsuji who always has so much to say and wanting the responsibility "taking on 3 dishes!"  

- http://fiero4251.blogspot.com/2011/06/top-chef-entry-for-1107-on.html -

- - http://www.childrenofrassilon.com/fiero425.html - - homepage

reply

I think Katsuji is worse. John is just an egomaniacal control freak, but Katsuji has a malicious streak to him that is really off-putting. I'm so glad he got cut and can now shut up for the rest of the season.

reply

I agree. Although I think John should have went home (from what we saw), I'm glad Katsuji did. You can't decide to make 3 (4?) dishes "because this is Top Chef, you have to take risks, I want to win" and then get mad that you didn't get enough help from your team, especially during Restaurant Wars. He actually put them ALL at risk because of his ego. And then the 'slow clap' in the stew room? Girl, bye.

I also agree with the other poster who defended John. He appeared frustrated, not unstable.

I don't want to make trouble, all I want is a drink.

reply

I think, ultimately, that was the reason Katsuji got the axe, even if he hadn't screwed up his dishes. This was Restaurant Wars - it's about a shared vision and execution. You don't win by throwing everyone else on your team under a speeding bus. That was just stupid as well as selfish.

reply

All of you need to go back and watch season 1&2 again. The judges don't care about the drama between the chefs. They care about the quality of the food, and during Restaurant Wars, they are looking for leaders.

In fact, over the years, the only time Tom has interfered is when the chefs from season 2 manhandled Marcel, with Cliff holding Marcel down for someone to shave his head. Otherwise, the judges have been hands off when it comes to the bickering between the chefs.

Katsuji wasn't terminated because of his personality. He was terminated because he attempted to avoid the Executive Chef role. Because the Executive Chef usually gets fired on the losing team.

He also made the decision to cook four dishes and then blamed John for not helping him.

As a leader, Katsuji made two poor decisions. The worst one was putting John in charge of expediting, and that led to the failure of the kitchen.

The drama in the kitchen was caused by Katsuji's decisions. He should have known better since he probably has seen season 10 of Top Chef and should have known that John has a huge ego and can't back up all of his talk.

reply

All of you need to go back and watch season 1&2 again. The judges don't care about the drama between the chefs. They care about the quality of the food, and during Restaurant Wars, they are looking for leaders.


LOL - It's been a LOOONNGGG time since seasons 1&2, the show has changed plenty

reply

I have to admit. He's kind of growing on me. I really believe he means well.

reply

Pulled out a tape of a "Beating Bobby Flay" show where John appeared! He won the initial challenge with a taco that was passible! His choice to beat Bobby was a "Beef Wellington!" Of course he went overboard and overdid it trying to impress! What a tool; lost when it could have been a breeze if he had kept it simple! Adding extras like prosciutto, chanterelles mushrooms, with a bordelaise sauce just had too much going on the plate!  

- http://fiero4251.blogspot.com/2011/06/top-chef-entry-for-1107-on.html -

- - http://www.childrenofrassilon.com/fiero425.html - - homepage

reply

Mushrooms in a puffed "Wellington" pie is illegal for a taco and over the top on a plate LOL.

reply

The plate was heavy with all the crap he kept loading onto it!  

- http://fiero4251.blogspot.com/2011/06/top-chef-entry-for-1107-on.html -

- - http://www.childrenofrassilon.com/fiero425.html - - homepage

reply