MovieChat Forums > The Nativity Story (2006) Discussion > If you follow the word of Jesus aren't ...

If you follow the word of Jesus aren't you Jewish...


In my "neutral" opinion...If you follow the "preachings" of Jesus would you not "have" to be considered Jewish?...as He was born Jewish and raised Jewish...would he not have been a teacher/leader of the Jewish faith?...and all those that follow him even today in all denominations be Jewish? I do not understand all the "different" religions...if they all follow the word of the Jewish Jesus. and why all of the hatred of the Jewish/Jewish faith if Jesus himself were Jewish?...When I pose this question to "Christians" of "other" faiths they quickly change the subject or simply say that they just are not Jewish with a nasty snarl on their faces...Just a thought that I have pondered for years....Thanx for your imput.

NUNS for HILLARY '08

reply

[deleted]

I appreciate your effort to explain...but...Jesus was still Jewish no matter what "changed"... beliefs or otherwise...my point is...If you follow/worship a Jewish Priest(which in my understanding is essentially what Jesus was)aren't you/shouldn't you be looked upon/considered as a Jew simply because you follow the teachings/words of a Jew?

I consider myself a "Neutral" in the field of religion...I was raised in a Southern Baptist atmosphere(not the extreme bible thumping sect so rampant here in Appalachia)...I am by no means "religious"...I find all religions fascinating...even the unconventional/alternative religions. They all have their pros and cons, wrongs and rights. All input is welcome.


NUNS for HILLARY '08

reply

[deleted]

Daisho 1965: I think you have very clearly given a great answer to the question asked. Thank you.

reply

Here is how i see it. First a little background. I am a Christian, raised as a Jew. First of all, Jesus WAS a Jew, both ethnically and spiritually. The Jews were God's chosen people so it would be logical that He would send His savior through His people. Now, when Christ came, he celebrated all the Biblical commands given in the Torah, HE was perfect, WE however are not able to attain that perfection. However in God's amazing grace, he sent Jesus to pay the price for those sins we can't control, Jesus lived a perfect life and paid for our sin for us. God intended for HIS people to accept and rejoice at his sacrifice and gift but many of them did not. They were expecting a royal high preist as their savior, and somehow could not concieve of the phenomenal paradox that God had planned for us, a plan SO much better than some guy on a horse taking out romans!!! But many jews DID believe and DID follow the path God had intended for His people. So in a sense, we as Christians ARE Jews, the REAL jews that God intended us to be!! God does love everyone though, and did not EXCLUDE others than jews for becoming His heirs, which is why when many others joined in and became "Christians" many of the Believing Jews had a big problem with that since they thought they should be heirs alone. Constantine sometime around the 100's i think, was a real jerk, from my understanding and did much to forcibly de-judiaze the early Christians, which for the most part were VERY jewish-like. He forced them to change their sabbath, and to NOT celebrate the God given festivals, which was a COMMANDMENT of God. THAT is why Christianity and Judaism are so different now. Also, when the Jews chose to follow a path that was man directed and not God directed, they forfeited God's presence... those are the two distinguising factors between JEws and Christians. PLease forgive me for rambling on, this is very interesting to me.

reply

Hi Kvenvolden,

Well, the 'de-judiazing' started before Constantine's time. You got the time period right (2nd century) or thereabouts that the rift began to drastically grow, mainly because the Jews were a protected group in the Roman Empire because they had an Ancient religion and even if the Romans thought they were wackjobs because they believed in one god, they respected 'ancientness'. Well, the Christians wanted a piece of that ancient religion protection so they showed that the Jewish prophesies, particularly those with Messianic overtones were about Christ. Of course the Jews didn't take that sitting down.

There were also groups who believed that Jesus was a great prophet but not God (the Ebionites) and there were others who believed Jesus was so great and divine that he couldn't be material at all (the Gnostics) and the Christian Orthodox had to find their way through those rival beliefs. The Ebionites were likely Jewish Christians who still didn't believe in Christ's divinity and that may have pushed the rift as well.

Shalom in Yeshua,
Tom516

"It is not enough to like a film. You must like it for the right reasons."
- Pierre Rissient

reply

"I'm a Christian raised as a Jew,"

Boy, "elsinora" at the Philosophy & Religion boards would love to get a hold of you.lol


"A real man would rather bow down to a strong woman than dominate a weak one"

reply

goddesskinda,

Jesus was not a Jewish Priest. Jesus was a member of the Tribe of Judah, and a descendant of King David.
The Priests were members of the Tribe of Levi, and descendants of Aaron (the first High Priest and brother of Moses).
Jesus was a Jew. He was an itinerant, uneducated Rabbi.
And there are, of course, those who believe that he was the Messiah, which is dependant upon - yet still transcends - his Jewishness.
Your assertion that people who believe that this Jew was the Messiah should be considered Jewish simply makes no sense.

reply

Jesus was born into the Jewish faith, but when he became a preacher he used a lot of his own, new ideas that sometimes went in a different direction from the Old Testament teachings. So a lot of his ideas could be considered outside of the conventional Jewish philosophy of the time.

reply

What is this guy talking about? It's like saying if you eat pasta, you're Italian.

Sin has lost its power, Death has lost its sting, from the grave You've risen....VICTORIOUSLY!

reply

Jesus was Jewish in race not religion. You cannot choose to become part of the Jewish race, just as you cannot become an Italian, you have to be born that way. You can become part of the Jewish religion, but Jesus was very anti-religion in His teachings. Religion is man’s attempt to reach God through works. God wants us to accept the reaching down that he has already done when He was sacrificed on the cross. Religion muddies the water.

reply

Thank you all...Jesus' teachings were more about enlightenment and living "right" than trying to "make" you believe in a god... Is my new understanding...

HAPPY HOLIDAYS TO YOU ALL!

NUNS for HILLARY '08

reply

NO, absolutely not! Jesus DID teach how to live a righteous life, obviously that is a good thing, but Jesus' primary message was that ALL have sinned and fall short of the glory of God- John 3:16 and that we are not able to live up to the perfection that God requires. That is why He sent a savior to us. If we didn't need one desperately, He certainly would not have made that sacrifice. It is ONLY through saving faith through Jesus Christ that any of us can gain eternal life. Nothing we do can earn that for us.

reply

goddessxinda,

Your new understanding is so far from being right! How can you claim to have any understanding if you haven't really put any effort into learning about Jesus and his teachings?
Read the Gospels, then we'll talk about what Jesus' teachings were about.
I think that there's a very good chance that you just might be trying to be silly...

reply

Jesus wasn't anti-religion, he was anti-what-the-pharisees-had-made-religion-into. Religion is made for man, not man for religion he said (in paraphrase) - it is to serve man's needs, to bring man closer to the divine and to provide a paradigm for man's limited mind to understand the infinity of God.

Shalom,
Tom516

"It is not enough to like a film. You must like it for the right reasons."
- Pierre Rissient

reply

jay mccaig,

Your understanding of what it means to be a Jew and who is a Jew is extremely flawed. Great Sages and Rabbis of the past - as well as Scholars and Experts of the present - have debated these questions. I think that all of them would tell you that your explanation is very wrong.
Your understanding of Jesus' Jewishness is also very wrong.

reply

Care to explain how my understanding is flawed?

reply

jay_mccaig,

Neither “Jewish” nor “Italian” is a racial designation.
“Italian” refers to nationality, and can be considered an ethnic designation as well.
The words “race” and “ethnicity” mean very, very different things. Check their definitions in a dictionary.
A person can choose to be Italian. All they have to do is immigrate to Italy and become a naturalized citizen.
As far as what it means to be a Jew and who is (and is not) a Jew, as I said in my other post, great Sages & Rabbis of the past (as well as scholars & experts of the present) have long debated these (and other related) questions, but I think that the overwhelming majority of them would agree that your understanding is way off.
Volumes have been written on the subject, but I think that the “Who is a Jew?” article on wikipidia.org does a decent job of summarizing the issues involved, and – since you obviously have internet access – you can check that out for yourself.
I really hate spoon-feeding things to people, especially when they can find the information so easily themselves.
Now, on to Ribbani Yehoshua Bin Yuhosef, Min Natzeraht, Ha Mashiyach, aka “Jesus Christ.”
He was – as you seem to be attempting to point out – Jewish by ethnicity.
He was – as we all are – a blood descendant of Aadham & Chawwa (Adam & Eve), and of Nouh (Noah).
He was a blood descendant Sem (Shem) and of Ebver (Eber).
He was a blood descendant of Abvram/Abvraham & Saray/Sara (Abram/Abraham & Sarai/Sarah).
He was a blood descendant of Yitschaq & Ribvqah (Isaac & Rebekah).
He was a blood descendant of Ya’aqoubv/Yisra’il & Lea (Jacob/Israel & Leah), and of their son Yehudah (Judah).
He was a blood descendant of Dawud Ha Malek (King David).
However, you also seem to be trying to say that you do not think that Jesus was religiously Jewish.
The four canonical Gospels of the New Testament of the Christian Bible make it clear that he was indeed a practitioner of the religion of Israel.
Not only was he prophesied by Miqra/TNK (the Jewish or Hebrew Bible, or the “Old Testament” of the Christian Bible), but he lived in complete, total, and perfect obedience to it & observance of it. It is clear that Tauwrah played a pivotal role in his daily life. He prayed in a very “Jewish” way. He kept & observed Pesakh (Passover), Shavuot (Pentecost), Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement), Ras Ha Sana (New Year), Sukkot (Feast of Tabernacles), and all of the other “Jewish” holidays, feast days, etc., etc… His famous “Last Supper” is a well-known example of this.
He went to Knesa (Synagogue) every Shabbat (Sabbath) in whatever village he was in at the time, and usually even more often than that. He spent a great deal of time in the Bayt Ha Miqdash (Temple) in Yerushalayim (Jerusalem). If he didn’t look like the other observant Jewish men, he wouldn’t have even been allowed in these places. That means following the religious laws, customs, rituals, etc. concerning his hair, beard, and clothing, amongst other things. He would have had a full beard, peyot (the long side-locks or “curls” seen on Orthodox Jews today), kippah (head covering such as a turban or skullcap); tzitziyot (tassels or fringes), etc., etc…
Read the following passages in your Bible for just a few indications of this:
Matthew 23:2-22; Mark 7:7-13; Luke 4:16-18, 10:25-28, 24:44; John 5:39, 8:29-55, 10:34, 15:25; Acts 3:22-23; Galatians 4:45; Hebrews 4:15; I Peter 2:22
There are plenty of others, but I think that you get the point.
I also strongly disagree with your understanding of what “religion” is, and with your assertion that “Jesus was very anti-religion in His teachings.”

reply

You are incorrect that Jewish is not a race. The Jewish race existed prior to and during the long absence of the nation of Israel. While you are correct that Italian is not a race but a nationality the correlation between the Jewish race and the nation of Italy does not exist. You are comparing apples and oranges.

As far as Jesus is concerned, His observance of the Jewish law is well documented and not disputed. But if he were alive, in the physical sense, today he would not adhere to the Jewish religion as it is practiced today. His coming to earth, in addition to seeking and saving the lost, was to transition believers from the Jewish law to a state of grace. The fact that the Jewish religion does not recognize Him as the Messiah or as God shows the disconnect between what He was preaching and what they are teaching.

reply

The rather sloppy correlation between Jewishness and Italianess (for lack of a better term) did not originate with me. It originated in the first post of yours that I responded to. I certainly agree that it is an unhelpful comparison. In fact, that was the point that I was trying to make by bringing it back up.
All I can say is to repeat what I have already said. There is a difference between "race" and "ethnicity," and most knowledgeable people would disagree that there is (or ever was) a Jewish "race," but instead would see Jewishness in terms of ethnicity, in addition to its religious connotations.
The literature backs me up on this. I wouldn't be saying it if it didn't.
If you refuse to accept that, there's really nothing more that I can say.

reply

cos-9

you may hate spoon feeding, but I enjoyed your informative post.

reply

Being Jewish is an ethnic heritage, like being Italian or Irish. Judaism is the religious faith that people of Jewish ethnicity usually adhere to. Gentiles, any person of non-Jewish heritage, can convert to Judaism. People who believe in Jesus and have accepted them as their Savior do not have to convert to Judaism. The Bible teaches throughout the Old Testament that God would send a Messiah or Savior to provide a way of salvation and that the Messiah would be of Jewish heritage. Jesus, who was of Jewish heritage, born in the lineage of King David as the Old Testament prophecies foretold, was that Messiah. Jesus, however, did not come only to provide salvation for the Jewish people but for all people. After Jesus died on the cross and was resurrected, anyone who places their faith in Him alone for their salvation is a Christian. Unfortunately, many Jewish people during Jesus' time up until today, do not recognize Jesus as the Messiah promised in the Old Testament because they expected a triumphant conquering King who would relieve them from their suffering. They did not expect a baby born in a manger, a man who was a carpenter, who washed his disciples' feet, who had interaction with "sinners" and who would die on a cross.

True Christians should not "hate" Jews - their Savior was Jewish. The Bible states that anyone that honors God's people, the Jews, God will honor - anyone who curses the Jews will be cursed.

reply

DanaCR said:
"Jesus, who was of Jewish heritage, born in the lineage of King David as the Old Testament prophecies foretold, was that Messiah."

Joseph was of the lineage of King David....

But Jesus was not OF the lineage of King David...(because Joseph was not his biological father...or so he said)...only BORN INTO the lineage through Josephs wife Mary...
Is this why the Jews do not believe that Jesus was the Messiah?



NUNS for HILLARY '08

reply

[deleted]

Given that family groups lived in generally the same areas and didn't travel as far as they would in later periods it's not surprising.

Tom516

"It is not enough to like a film. You must like it for the right reasons."
- Pierre Rissient

reply

goddessxinda,

Jesus was legally the son of Joseph, and biologically the son of Mary.
Both Joseph and Mary were descendants of King David.
Therefore, Jesus was both legally and biologically a descendant of King David.

reply

"True Christians should not "hate" Jews - their savior was Jewish."

Well said! Saying you love Jesus but hate Jews is like saying you love French fries but hate potatoes.

"A real man would rather bow down to a strong woman than dominate a weak one"

reply

Saying you love Jesus but hate Jews is like saying you love French fries but hate potatoes.


this is the smartest and most clever thing posted here

reply

Why thank you.:-)


"A real man would rather bow down to a strong woman than dominate a weak one"

reply

Hi Dana, thanks for your great post! It seems you really know what you're talking about and you don't seem to be leaving the essentials out... thanks again! I am very much 'involved' in tje subject and I would probably have written the same thing. -Menno

reply

Here's the thing - the Jewish faith of today is very different from the Jewish faith of Jesus' day. There were different groups then - the Essenes, the Zealots, the Pharisees and then the odd prophet (like Jesus or John the Baptist) who would spring up and gather followers and soon as not, dry up and blow away. The thing is the Roman invasion after the great Jewish revolt utterly destroyed the Temple and the Essenes and Zealots were wiped out while the Pharisees ended up morphing into the Jewish faith of today.

During Jesus's lifetime it was simply Jesus as a self-made rabbi having religio-philosophical arguments with other rabbis which didn't make them any less Jewish. It's only much later in Christian history, particularly when Christianity's relationship with its 'mother faith' became strained and hostility (w/c sadly developed into Christian anti-semitism - though anti-semitism had existed BEFORE Christianity, ask Haman or the Seleucids if in doubt) that there came to be a great divide between Jews (who held to ritual and tradition and the various laws) and the Christians.

Shalom and Happy New Year,
Tom516

P.S.
I'm not Jewish though - I just like the old Jewish peace greeting! Reminds me of the roots of my faith.

"It is not enough to like a film. You must like it for the right reasons."
- Pierre Rissient

reply

goddessxinda,

I know that I’m starting two posts on the boards for this film with the same paragraph, but I can’t help myself. Your post was one of the stupidest things (if not the stupidest thing) that I’ve ever read, and I used to teach High School English! Your post reminded me why I gave up posting on IMDb for a while.
I’ll refrain from correcting your misuse of punctuation, your poor spelling, your atrocious grammar, and the like.
Instead of pondering something for years, why don’t you read a book or two? Maybe even look it up on wikipedia.
I’ve also taught Social Studies, and I feel like someone needs to start from scratch with you to explain what is wrong with everything that you said. I’ll try to be brief, though.
Yes, Jesus was a Jew. Jesus proclaimed himself to be the long-awaited Jewish Messiah.
His original (Jewish) followers believed him, and spread this belief throughout the Roman Empire.
The overwhelming majority of Jews did not believe that Jesus was the Messiah, nor did they believe that he was even a good teacher or anything of that sort.
Many Greek-speaking non-Jews did believe that Jesus was the Messiah.
The many differences between these two groups (the ones that believed that Jesus was the Messiah, and the ones that did not) quickly became apparent, as did the need for terminology to distinguish between the two groups.
Those who did not believe that Jesus was the Messiah continued to call themselves Jews, just as they had for a very long time.
Those who did believe that Jesus was the Messiah began to be called “Christians” by others, and accepted this name. “Christ” comes from a Greek word that has roughly the same meaning as “Messiah.”
There has been hatred towards Jews on the part of people who claimed to be Christians in the past. However, this has died down considerably in recent times. Most knowledgeable Israelis will tell you that their country’s “best friends” are American Christians.
I haven’t ready any of the other posts on this thread made in reply to yours, so please forgive me if I repeat something that’s already been said.
If you need any more help clearing this up, please just let me know.

reply

Ahhh, the arrogance and idiocy of the greater than thou "CHRISTIAN". You will surely rot and burn in hell. My husband is a man of the cloth here in the South, so I beg to differ with you on several points, and I don't really care about your opinion. You are no different than those that knock on the door early Saturday morning and try to force their opinion down my throat as if I am too stupid to have an opinion of my own. Your post WILL NOT change the way that I think, you can hurl all of the insults that you want! You obviously feel that you are so much better than everyone else in the world and feel that you should be worshipped. Sorry, not gonna happen! here anyway. You will surely deny your conceit, which will only confirm my opinion of you, which I am sure that you will say that you could care less about, and that is expected. I can only laugh at your words and feel sorry for you because you are no where near as intelligent as you believe yourself to be. Somethng else for you to think about...
Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married.
They had children.
The bible is a good book as long as you don't take it literally.
The anti-christ that christians are waiting and watching for will be a female
What fools you are to wait for a man that has been dead for over 2000 years to rise from the dead..that one is hilarious!
*beep* YOU. 'cause Jesus wouldn't.

"Remember, your precious rose has nasty, hooky, thorns."

reply

goddesxinda,

I did open my first reply to you with what could be considered something of a personal attack. That was uncalled for, and I apologize.
However, the bulk of my posts on this thread deal in facts and truth. They have little to do with feelings or opinions.
I was neither disagreeing with your opinions, nor sharing mine with you. You made blatantly false and inaccurate statements, and asked questions that were ultimately founded in extreme ignorance. I shared true, accurate, factual information with you.
Be careful. You seem convinced that you know my religious affiliation, when in fact you do not. Neither do you know my educational background, my former or current occupations, or anything else about me, for that matter.
I’m quite sure that your claim to be married to a “man of the cloth” contains a couple of lies.
It has seemed obvious to me from the first post of yours that I read that you are most likely a teenager. While it is possible that you are married (with parental consent), I’m not sure that it is very likely.
The designation “man of the cloth” is usually reserved for members of the clergy of liturgical Christian denominations. If your husband truly was a “man of the cloth” and had the seminary credentials to back such a claim up, he would have set you straight on many, many things a long time ago, including the basic question(s) that you brought up in your original post, and the many ignorant errors that you’ve made since then.
I also doubt that you’d be calling yourself “goddesxinda” if you were truly married to a “man of the cloth,” or that you’d be trying to give me the other particular little “things to think about” that you shared in your previous post.
By the way, although scholars & experts disagree about many, many things when it comes to Jesus, it is almost unanimously agreed in the academic community that Jesus and Mary Magdalene never married or had children.
I also find it strange that you seem to discount most of the Bible, yet still think that there is an “Antichrist” coming.
The rest of your post is either not worth responding to, or impossible to respond to.
Ultimately, I see that you are a person who cannot be reasoned with in any way, and it really is quite pointless to attempt to do so. You are incapable of having any sort of a normal, intelligent discussion or communicating in any mature way. I genuinely don’t mean that as a personal jab. That is just the unmistakable impression given by all of your posts.
If I'm wrong - and I sincerely hope that I am - please share the "several points" that you "beg to differ with" me on.

reply

[deleted]

I wouldn't go so far as to saying it's silly....but honestly it just doesn't add up. Just with the first two chapters of the bible Gen. 1 and 2. The first chapter says man was created on the 6th day AFTER all the plants and animals and the formation of earth. But in the second chapter man was made BEFORE the plants and all the animals were made FOR man. Just that alone is enough for me to think this isn't right. I don't doubt that we may have been created by a higher power...i just don't think any of the religions really have the right answer.

Because with all the evidence there is of god, there is evidence of Aliens. With how big the galaxy is there is no question that there is other life out there that is just too far for humans to ever reach. My point of that is we're not god's only creation. There are other beings out there that live and breathe and possibly have intelligence. If that's true, then god left a big part out then when he's creating the universe.

And i noticed everything is dome shaped in the bible. in reference to earth. I'm curious if Jesus made any mention to the world being flat????

Cause she's got a great ass... and you got your head all the way up it!

reply

Great post. I am a Christian and I simply don't get how people claiming to be Christians can be anti-Semitic (or intolerant of any group for that matter) as Christianity was indeed an offshoot of Judaism and Jesus said "Love thy neighbor as thyself". I have grown up with a number of Jewish friends and I have never once witnessed anything that validates the horrible things some people say about them. Stereotypes are based on the few rotten apples that exist in EVERY ethnic group. I have both European and Native American ancestry so I should know.

Over the last 2,000 years the two religions have certainly picked up a lot of outside material and drifted further apart as a result, but bottom line, the same God is still worshipped.

The following statement is true
The previous statement is false

reply

Jesus was a rebel, he constantly taught things differently than the Jewish rabbis. You need to study more to get it. Christians are followers of Christ.

reply

"Jesus was a rebel, he constantly taught things differently than the Jewish rabbis. You need to study more to get it. Christians are followers of Christ."


No, I totally get it. I have studied a great deal. Rebel or not...Jesus was Jewish...Mary (his mother)was Jewish...His "father" was jewish...Jesus, Minister, Rabbi, Preist, Preacher...each teach things differently...Jesus and his "father" are still the main focus of all their teachings...and the base of all those teachings root in Judaism...this is not negative or wrong..Just fact..


"Remember, your precious rose has nasty, hooky, thorns."

reply

Following Jesus does not make one Jew. Galatians 3:28 says "There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus."
Being a follower of Christ does change who or what we are- we are just followers of Christ.

And in 1 Peter chapter 2 "9 But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s special possession, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light. 10 Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy. "

Christians are the chosen people- those who follow Christ.

reply