MovieChat Forums > Seed (2006) Discussion > If Michael Haneke made it, they'd call i...

If Michael Haneke made it, they'd call it art


Well, some bits. Very disturbing film. Not a good movie by any stretch of the imagination, but impossible to ignore and contains at least three jaw-dropping moments.

Full review is here:

http://www.schlockaroundtheclock.com/?p=512

Along with lots of other Boll and bad-movie news.

reply

I agree, and think it's kinda hilarious, as I quite liked this film, and think Funny Games (BOTH versions) is the worst movie I've EVER seen (and I've seen a LOT).

People are so dumb. Especially on the internet. Oh well.

reply

[deleted]

Well If it would be a Haneke movie, it would be entirely different, and probably not this stupid.

reply

"Well If it would be a Haneke movie, it would be entirely different, and probably not this stupid. "

Clearly, you haven't watched "Benny's Video." More moronic than anything Boll's name is on.

To the world you may just be somebody, but to somebody you may just be the world.

reply

If Haneke made it, I'd call it a bad Haneke movie. It wouldn't be the first.

I didn't even know this was actually directed by Uwe Boll until I looked it up. I was only aware that his production company was involved. In any case, I think it's bad even by Boll's standards, simply because he used real life torture footage to knee-jerk a reaction out of the viewer, and then presented it as social commentary, not by putting it in an appropriate context, but by friggin' prefacing this stupid slasher schlock with a "WARNING! THIS IS A PROFOUND INSIGHT INTO HUMANITY!" disclaimer. It's so dumb, so cheap, so manipulative and so lazy... just a bad movie.

reply

They would also call it boring.

---------------------------------------------
Applied Science? All science is applied. Eventually.

reply