MovieChat Forums > Outlaw (2007) Discussion > Why was Sandy (long hair victim) in the ...

Why was Sandy (long hair victim) in the film?


After watching the film, I was still wondering why Sandy Mardell was written into this film. He was one of the main gang, but wasn't even addressed when Bean told them to disband, and he left before the final conflict.

He had no connection to the main plot, apart from being a victim of crime. Surely just there to make up the numbers.

(Although as far as relevence goes, Bean had an axe to grind simply because his wife was with another man, and Danny Dyer because he was beaten up once, not to mention having a premonition which would never happen in reality. Munroe made sense because his wife and baby were killed and the secutirty guard because he was convincingly bloodthirsty. Maybe I should just take the entire cast with a pinch of salt. The acting was good though on a positive note.)

reply

My guess is because he is the only one of the group who possibly manages a return to normal life despite being a crime victim. He has won some self-confidence back, but there is no return to the vigilante gang. It is my interpretation of the scene in the university library when he is flirting with the girl.

reply

I'm pretty sure he was the son of Sean Bean's ex-commanding officer. I think they said that on the TV news report. They seemed to meet when Bean was at the house talking with the army guy.
Plus he was refined and cultured with a big jeep, all indicative of his father being a high ranking officer.

reply

yes, son of his last army CO. I think he is quiet and withdrawn as he has a nasty scar across his face as though he'd been glassed in a bar for no reason as well as getting battered for being supposedly gay according to the news reports

reply