Is it me or did Julianna Guill really look like she was having a good time?share
No. It isn't just you.share
I think we should ask if Travis Van Winkle was having a good time.share
He should. He got to play with her boobs and I wonder if they actually screwed behind the scenesshare
you know that's a really interesting thing to think about. I mean they probably did considering they thought they might as well considering they basically already had sex while filming that scene. and also, its' really interesting to me how in a movie sex scene a guy can touch an actress's body and grope her boobs when they aren't dating or boyfriend and girlfriend.
don't you find that interesting also? I mean in a way it's like rape. she never gave him the permission to grope her boobs but he did it anyway. I know it's just acting, and he had to do it or was encouraged to go all out in the realism category but is it really acting when he got to cope a feel on her boobs? this is when acting goes over the line into real life touching and breaking someone's personal space barrier.
ok, having sex with someone is not acting. it's real, so in the same regard touching a woman's boobs is real. both require touching a body part. both things are the exact same thing. it doesn't matter if she gave him permission, the fact remains he broke her personal space and went too far.share
This is one of the dumbest posts I've ever read.share
The movie makers agree on what is involved in the shooting of the scene. It is agreed before.share
but still you have to admit if you think about it, she was violated. I mean she's not in a relationship with him and is not having a fling with him so then she was violated. if not, girls should not be ever afraid about showing their boobs in public.
by the way how come it's ok for a girl to show every single part of her boobs but not their nipples or areolas in public??? what about nipples or areolas make them somehow more private of parts and not allowed to expose in public? all 3 of these things are a part of a boob. is it just because they are different colored than white boobs? and if so, then why are lips ok to show on a face?
also when does showing an ass in public become nudity? a thong can cover the smallest amount of an ass possible, so what can you not show of your ass? I guess it's the pussy and asshol# only, right?
No, I don't have to admit that because your logic is ridiculously stupid. She was not violated. She agreed to do the scene.share
That's what I was saying too. Jeez this thread is hilarious. Everybody getting excited over a 1 minute sex scene.share
yes, you do have to admit that because my logic is sound and makes sense and is true and correct and so to disagree would mean you are ridiculously stupid. fine, just stay ridiculously stupid.
she was violated, whether she knew it or not. just like a porn star. they agree to get fuc#ed for money but they dont' know how damaging psychologically and emotionally and how much that they are getting taken advantage of by doing porn. and they don't know that their bodies are getting violated and used and abused.
well then you're not able to grasp what i'm saying. i'm being deep here, looking beneath the surface. i don't care if it's acting, he still is a guy who is not with her in a relationship who got to touch her boobs. heck just showing nudity julia roberts has a problem with and just that she called being in a documentary, she said why should i show nudity? it's not like i'm in a documentary.
this would be the same thing was me walking up to juliana guill and grabbing her boobs.
no, your logic is stupid. i don't care if she agreed to do this scene or not, she was violated in the most basic sense that she was touched by someone on the boobs who is not her boyfriend or fling partner.share
It's not even one of the dumbest posts this guy has made.
CG gore is the worst thing that has ever happened to the horror genre.
Dude, check out the posts he made on this thread.
now why would you think that just because two actors have sex in a movie that they had sex in real life?share
exactly, 10 years later and i still can't get that sex scene out of my head! it's the best sex scene ever in a legitimate movie.share
I think this was actually her first movie. Certainly the first considerable part in one.share
that's unbelievably and unimaginably beautiful. I can't believe that. that is too perfect and too awesome. that's the best thing ever. she just started acting in big parts and then said, "ok, I'm willing to do anything and everything for a part because I'm a starving actress, wet behind the ears and ready and willing to go all the way for a part." gosh I love that, that is so sexy and so sexually arousing.
another thing I love is how she was born in 1987 I guess so that means she was only 21 years old when this movie filmed??? are you kidding me??? so she was at her best looking age of her life when she made this film. I love this.
Julianna is obviously not one of those Shannon Whirry types who simply don't give a shit. So I guess she was desperate and/or somehow thought this would make her a star.share
ok, what? why does there have to a reason, a qualifying rule which makes it ok for an actress to show nudity in a movie? i mean, that is so sad it's tragic that idea. so an actress has to be desperate or thinks this will put them on the map for their career, or has to be wild and free to show nudity in a movie?
actresses show nudity because it's in the plot and the script and because the audience needs to be satisfied sexually, to provide entertainment value and sexual stimulation, you know giving movie fans what they demand in movies.
i don't know what you mean by don't give a shit? do you mean she doesn't care about herself being typecast in sexual roles or do you mean she is wild and free sexually?
Yes it did look like she was having a great time.share
It looked like she was having a good enough time to make me jealous of her. lolshare