Sound movie, but only if you are willing to think for yourself.
While I do believe it is wrong for someone to be mislead and guided by propoganda, I don't believe this film aims to achieve this.
Taking an independant standpoint and assessing the facts is what really counts, and in learning or realisation one assimilates knowledge from as many sources as possible. Blindly believing whatever you are told is both foolish and irrational.
I just finished watching this film, and although I found it a tad boring at times I can sympathise with the authors with the neccessity to appeal to a larger range of people. Without the "story" so to speak, the majority of viewers would have turned away instantly if it was presented as purely a documentary and discussion into this controversial subject. While you may argue that using such means to entice potential viewers is dishonest, at least it offers a radical film to skeptics who in turn may change their opinions or conversely reinforce the ones they held previously.
Recently I have been seeking answers and researching into the general observations and so called "big questions" that hit us all at some point. Even though the film seems a bit ridiculous at times, the majority of the non-quantum theory behind it seems acceptable enough to contemplate. That saying I did not swallow the whole load and expect my life to change instantly as a result. However, I have been living my life with a more positive attitude, adopting some of the theories and beliefs in this film to my own agenda, and as a result my life has become much more pleasurable.
People who I have read disputing claims or vigourously defending them both have good points, but they also have a lot of flaws. Just because you as an individual percieve reality differently to another individual, does not give you the right to attempt to destroy anothers' beliefs. Is it that you get a pleasure out of disproving others, or that you feel the neccessity to back your own beliefs in fear of their legitimacy? A lot of people found hope and control in this film, while others found nothing. Big deal? Just because you didn't benefit from it, don't feel obligated to extend your personal depression to the rest of us.
Either way, fear of the unknown is what drives me in life. While I feel for those desperately clinging to the commonly accepted (and by their standards as the majority agree, it is more likely to be true) "observations" of consciesness and matter, I also feel that clinging to the past won't neccessarily help you in the future.
Any further discussion would be interesting, I'd like to see how others interpreted and adapted this film. After all, it is all just SPECULATION AND THEORY, so individual interpretation is what matters.