MovieChat Forums > Gene Simmons: Family Jewels (2006) Discussion > Wow.. my sex tape post was deleted..

Wow.. my sex tape post was deleted..


and not by me. I wonder who did that. PM me if you want to see the tape.

reply

Thanks for the link,had to see if it was real.
It sure looked like him.



=========================
badgers? badgers!? WE DON'T NEED NO STINKIN' BADGERS!!!

reply

I saw it the other day when it was on the board. It was definitely Gene.

It was deleted by somebody who reported it because they were probably offended and you can't really post porn on IMDb.

I wasn't impressed with him... he kept on his t-shirt and it was boring really.
Shame on him for cheating on Shannon with that nasty girl and shame on him for his KIDS knowing about the video!!!

reply

really? IMDB lists porn. What's the difference between someone googling it or flat out having the link fall into your lap?

reply

I think (just my opinion mind you) that IMDB makes the distinction between talking about porn (the listings of porn movies, for instance) and the posting of actual porn images. The former can and does happen on broadcast TV, either in programs or on the news. I have yet to see the latter intentionally on broadcast TV (yeah, we all know about Playboy TV and PPV, I'm talking about over the air broadcasts).

reply

Brian, here's what the OP cannot seem to grasp for whatever reason (dense?). Children as young as 13 are allowed to post on these boards. The admins are fairly lax with the content being allowed to post, with the exception of using F-words and N-words, and even those get by using trickery to get them to dispaly. But they will not tolerate links to porn videos/images, because parents don't want their kids seeing that material, and the admins don't want kids to see adult images. Plus, IMDb wants to keep this site "kid-friendly". Well, as kid-friendly as can be without omitting too much.

reply

Yeah, that makes total sense. One of the fully thought out responses here I have seen in awhile.

reply

really? IMDB lists porn.

They list the name of the movie/TV show, plot, actors, ect. They don't display porn images. Big difference.

What's the difference between someone googling it or flat out having the link fall into your lap?

IMDb is a movie database. Google is a search engine for anything and everything. Two totally different sites for two totally different purposes. IMDb is much more vigil about monitoring their site, whereas Google expects the parents to monitor their kids by clicking "safe search" so their children do not see adult images. Parents should monitor their kids regardless if they are using Google or IMDb.

reply

and not by me. I wonder who did that. PM me if you want to see the tape.

You do know that it's against the law to send kids pornographic images/videos via email and/or PMs, don't you? Or is it that you're stupid, or don't care?

reply

Isn't it illegal if you know they are underage or they tell you they are underage? If someone sent a link to someone & they turned out to be underage, I don't thnk they could be charged with anything. Having said that, I watch "To Catch a Predator" and that's my knowledge of the law in this area, so I wouldn't post or send porn to anyone over the internet or e-mail.

You guys made me curious, so I looked at the tape. It appears the tape was made a long time ago - B&W + the old TV in the background. That video could be 20 yrs old; that guy has hair like Gene has now + there's something abt his body that doesn't quite look like Gene Simmons + I heard this guy had a tattoo. I didn't see one, but I didn't care to enlarge the screen thank you very much. I don't think it is Gene Simmons; I think it is a guy who looks an awful lot like what Gene Simmons looks like now. If it is Gene Simmons, it could be 20, even 30 yrs old. But I don't think it's him.

reply

cinles, courts don't recognize "ignorance" and/or "I didn't know he/she was underage" as a defense. You can still be charged with sending porn to a child, and have to register as a sex offender. It's against the law.

Law aside, it's against IMDb's rules to share pornographic/nude images on this site regardless of how old you are.

"A 3-year-old is like having a blender, but you don't have a top for it."

reply

didnt the guy in the sex tap have tattoos? If so, it wasnt Gene. Jews and tattoos don't usually mix

reply

Tattoos are against the Jewish religion, but I don't think Gene is particularly religious. Marrying a gentile woman and having non Jewish kids would be considered a worse "sin" in the Jewish world than getting tattoo. Plus a whole bunch of other things he does. I think he's more of a cultural Jew than a religious one. It totally wouldn't suprise me if he had tattoos.
Anyway if it was him in the video, it was kind of sad. The sex looked really uninspired to say the least. I think she turned her head whenever he tried to kiss her.I dont think she was into him and it seemed like she was just laying there waiting for him to get it over with. Its almost appeared like a payed escort or someone who just wanted to sleep with him because he was a rock star. There was as much passion in his love making as someone plunging a clogged up toilet. He's bragged about all the thousands of women he's slept with, but if they were all like that session, I don't think he has much to brag about.

reply

[deleted]

I always bring the A-game! none of that junior varsity boning!!

reply

I saw the tape. Gene doesn't go unmasked. The chick didn't look very into it. She was acting like Gene just ate a lot of onions.

reply