1. I think Paul Hogan was cast as Hirohito, but his scenes were cut. He couldn't leave the country, and Imperial Tokyo just didn't look very convincing with the Sydney Opera House in the background.
2. Hey now. This movie was written by a Japanese citizen. So it's not American rewriting of history, it's Japanese rewriting of history. If they want to believe they were the only people fighting the entire world in WWII, more power to them. It's kind of a "losing with defiance" stance, you know, sure Japan was miserably defeated for the first time in their history, but look who they were up against! THE WHOLE WORLD!!!
3. Steve Perry wasn't born until 1949, silly. (But how much happier would this movie have been if they'd set the reveal of all those old letters to "Don't Stop Believin?")
4. And all the Japanese were Asian!!
Awesome post by the way. I especially love how more than half the responses have treated it seriously.
Here, let me help. A year or so ago, Spike Lee got really righteous (hard to believe) and accused Clint Eastwood of blatant racism in his WWII movies. Saying he didn't cast any black men as soldiers on the island. It's a nonsense issue, especially because there weren't any black soldiers on the island, and that's more a crime of segregation and our own government's near-sightedness in the 1940's, rather than Clint Eastwood's. But that's what (I believe) the OP was commenting on. Ta Da!
reply
share