MovieChat Forums > Weapons (2007) Discussion > this looks really good...

this looks really good...

posted 18 years ago by ugogirl592
13 replies | jump to latest

good cast, seemingly good plot. what do you think??

[–] theredsock 18 years ago

i hope nick cannon dies in the first scene because he cannot act to save his life.

[–] bapestaz6 18 years ago

thats funny you say that because i was working on the set with him and some others and you couldn't be more right..

[–] ozzyohy 17 years ago

this movie gonna SUCK!!!!

[–] 17 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Ro_Rahm 17 years ago

What do u mean "Do you think you can do better?"

Spoiler?

I'm not like straight comin out and attacking you but if u don't believe him, it's true.

I read the screenplay. I don't think that's a spoiler since its the first thing u see in the movie..

The screenplay was amazing, I just hope they can create it like I saw it while I was reading. Paul Dano will kick ass.

[–] 17 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 17 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 17 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 17 years ago

[deleted]

[–] eickholt-16 17 years ago

I actually just got back from sundance. This was the first movie I saw and by far my favorite. Nick Cannon getting his head blown off in the first scene was sweet.

[–] 17 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Tiresias314 17 years ago

Just saw this tonight at Sundance, and it's ridiculously bad. The acting performances are decent, but with proper editing, the film would have been maybe 60 minutes. Furthermore, the film is an egregious rip-off of IRREVERSIBLE by Gaspar Noe. The film structure and even a few key scenes are directly transposed into this film.

[–] lilskatewaker 17 years ago

......yeah you were at the same screening as me. This film was amazing. The editing was made that way for a reason. I wonder if you stayed for the q&a. I hope you aren't stuck on commercial movie filming and editing. Simple editing can be much better than sepcial fx and fancy editing.