MovieChat Forums > Wanted (2008) Discussion > Angelina Jolie looks super gross

Angelina Jolie looks super gross


She is FRIGHTENINGLY scrawny! I could not get over how disgusting her arms look throughout the movie. Someone get this woman some help!!! Or a burger, at least!

reply

Between me and you, she always has looked gross to me...

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

"Because God created it, the human body
can be uncovered and preserve His splendor"

Too bad god never existed in the first place.


edit: and yeah, Angelina looked gross.

Yeah? Well, you know, that's just like your opinion, man.

reply

Too bad god never existed in the first place.


Source please.

I don't love her.. She kicked me in the face!!

reply

Do you have a source that god existed?

reply

I haven't made any assertions. Regarding yours: Again, source please.

I don't love her.. She kicked me in the face!!

reply

Neither have I. Good eyes you got there. Go get them checked.

reply

Yes, I see that I mistook you for the other poster. Why would that make you respond in such a rude manner?

I don't love her.. She kicked me in the face!!

reply

https://youtu.be/nCY2me1Gudg?t=13

reply

Lowell.

I don't love her.. She kicked me in the face!!

reply

You should do some reading about BMI. It's actually completely useless in figuring out a humans health. It has nothing to do with how healthy you are at all. In fact, scientifically it has no use what so ever unless you conduct experiments on yourself and need to know the exact total mass of your body. Doctors who enforce BMI are either very poorly educated doctors, hence do not deserve their Ph.D. Or they have been paid off by movie companies or fashion magazines to further enforce the idea that the way to look attractive and healthy is by looking like a skeleton... It's quite funny actually, where I come from, looking like a skeleton either means you live in a 3rd world country and/or you're dieing... Or it means it's Halloween.

reply

Medical Doctors are MDs (mostly), not PhDs.

reply

It's Doctor of Medicine :) Not Medical Doctor. Medicinae Doctor is Latin term but even medicinae isn't an adverb that's translated -- "medical"

reply

He/she obviously meant medical doctor, as opposed to someone who has a PHD, who would be a doctor but not in medicine. It makes sense, so get over it.

Freedom! Horrible, horrible freedom!

reply

Yup- my thought exactly-M.D.=medical doctor.

reply

I can almost guarantee you that whoever posted this is overweight, perhaps grossly. BMI is legitimate and describes the ideal range in which a body should be to maintain optimum health. Every single person that I have debated health issues regarding weight that have dismissed (no name pun intended) BMI or any other physical standard has been overweight. And, without coincidence, their argument to the contrary has always included the extreme of a person being a "skeleton."

Hey, wake-up call: You can be a little pudgy and still be within the BMI for your age and height; also, you can be too skinny and fail to be in your correct BMI range. If your choice is to have your physical shape be outside of your BMI (ie. overweight), that's fine. That's your decision. But, stop trying to use the "skeleton" excuse to justify and rationalize your decision and argument.

ps. It is understood that variables such as abnormal medical conditions and disabilities will skew the intentions of maintaining a physical standard such as BMI. Let's keep the focus of this on the intended targets, average humans in good health who do not possess a physical disability or abnormal medical condition.

Stand up. Hook up. Shuffle to the door.

reply

[deleted]

You miss out that being within the 'correct' BMI doesn't automatically equate good health. You can be completely within your BMI range but have high cholesterol, heart disease and unable to run 20 yards, whilst you can be above the dictated BMI but still be fit and healthy.

Most people who weight train would exceed a 'normal' BMI range, ditto rugby and American football players - basically, BMI is merely an 'indicator' and not the absolute last word in health.

reply

[deleted]

My father had a check-up and was in the normal range,walked every day,stopped smoking. Dr. told him he was the picyure of health . He died 2 weeks later of a myocardial infarction at the age of 56. My mother was overweight due to repeated pregnancies,had mutiple medical problems, colon cancer,a pacemaker,thyroid cancer,and lived to be 95.My thin,active husband,who exercises every day,has had a stroke and angioplasty. I am heavy, have chronic illnesses and take 50 pills a day. My cholesterol is the same as my mom's-330. Kevin Sorbo had 6 % body fat and was at the height of his career doing Hercules when he had multiple strokes. Season 6? I believe ,was the one where he sat on log,reminiscing. Nothing is certain.

reply

I'm super late to this party but I had to reply anyway. BMI is not accurate in determining overall health. Whoever this poster claims to have debated must have really sucked at debating. If someone's BMI is 26, can you tell me how much body fat and muscle mass that person has? No, you cannot. In fact, all you have to do is look at professional athletes to see that BMI is useless. LeBron James has a BMI of 28.56 (overweight), Maurice Jones Drew's is 32.89 (obese), Bo Jackson's was 30.34 (obese) in his playing days. Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson's is 30.83 (obese). How can anyone say BMI is accurate at determining overall health?

reply

BMI or not. Angelina and other anorexic people cant be considered as healthy.

reply

I was just flabbergasted at the ignorance of the person I was replying to :)

reply

Part of the problem here is confusion between population averages and individuals. Health statistics are based on populations. If we compare two large populations, one with BMI in the range considered "healthy" and one with BMI in the "obese" range, the obese population would have more individuals with type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and some other conditions associated with obesity. In general, an individual with BMI in the obese range is more likely to have diseases associated with obesity.

To make things more confusing, this association, by itself, doesn't prove that obesity causes the diseases (although there is evidence that this is usually the case). There might be some other condition, like diet, that results in both obesity and related diseases.

In any case, none of this means that what's true for populations is true for every individual in that population. As an example, US professional basketball players, on average, are taller than the general population. That doesn't mean that every professional basketball player is taller than every person who isn't a professional basketball player.

BMI is a useful predictor of disease in populations and often, but not necessarily, in individuals.

reply

Yh maybe a little thin for my liking but shes still got a nice ar*se

reply

Yes, she is decidedly underweight by my reckoning but she has the added disadvantage of having large hands and veiny arms which are always accentuated when she's carrying less meat on her bones.

She's still a very beautiful woman however. But being too thin can age a woman who is over thirty. I am over thirty and I am about the same height and weight but I'm more "petite". I have tiny hands and feet, for example.

Angelina looked at her best in her roles as Lara Croft (Tomb Raider), because she was on a special diet and trained her physique to optimum levels and it suited her. She was still slim but she was toned and tanned and well, just healthy looking!

http://s1.zetaboards.com/cyber_cafe/index/

reply

Spot on, highpriestess.

You know NOTHING of the crunch, you've never even BEEN to the crunch!!

reply

[deleted]

She looked haggard & really thin. It was distracting, actually. I'll never understand why she's considered an Uberfox.




'He's the only man I know who can strut sitting down.'

reply

She filmed this after the death of her mother. Give her a break, she was still mourning her loss.

http://thesillywagon.com/blog/uploaded_images/brad-angelina-cannes-200 7-26-743572.jpg

reply

If she was in that much mourning, i guess she could have also passed on the Fox part.
And don't tell me she is supposed to make a living :P

reply

I know a lot of people that go to work when they feel bad, even when they're in mourning! Of course she could probably afford to pass on roles if she wants to, but I also know that when you're really depressed you WANT to work in order to forget. So it's perfectly plausible that she was in mourning which caused her to lose weight but at the same time she wanted to stay busy, therefore she accepted the role.

reply

[deleted]

I agree. We thought she looked terrible -- so skinny and washed out like a major heroin junkie.

reply

SonicAndy:

The role was written specifically for Jolie.
If it wasn't, I'm sure they would NOT have chosen Jolie - just becuase of her body that did NOT fit for being an assaisain...

reply

Her face is striking. But I agree that she is way, way, way too thin. I found it distracting as well -- I kept looking at her tiny long arms and wondering how she even held up a gun. It was kind of nasty-looking, actually. That and those nasty-azz tattoos all over detract from her beauty.

reply

OP. You must like cows.

reply

weight reduction surgery - boner

http://pillsaregood.ytmnd.com/

reply

How abt u, u like munching on bones? :p

reply

Yeah...the Grim Reaper likes a good skeleton too.

reply

Matthew030303 obviously likes those stick figure runway models

I don't know anyone can say she looks fine. She was awesome in Gia.....back when she had a little meat on her bones.

reply

Yeah, Matthew, because not liking underweight people automatically means you adore obese people. There's nothing in-between. No no.

"Everybody relax, I'm here." - Jack Burton

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

(All these people complaining about her being ''too thin'' must be fat people who are jealous)

That is one of the the most childish things people on here say about this subject.
Anyone who has seen her in almost anything before, knows she is a beautiful healthy woman. But not here. Not even close. Something was going on to make her this thin. Angelina has always had a nice shape. Here, she is sickly looking. I, and we, are not trying to bash or judge her,, just simply making a very noticeable observation.
By the way I'm 49,,,,6'1and weigh 183. Not even close to overweight. Stop attacking people for noticing what you refuse to.

Never interrupt silence unless you're
going to improve it

reply

Dude, lots of problems with this movie but her looks ain't one of them.

reply

Thank goodness I wasn't the only one who thought she looks like *beep* Yeah her mom died so maybe she she had backed out. It would've been a good excuse.

reply

She lost a lot of weight after her mother died, and she's also tall and lanky, as one poster pointed out. I know she has help, but she's a very "hands-on" mother of six, and that has to be exhausting. She's gaining back some much needed weight, and I thought she looked a lot healthier in The Changeling.

"I heet the Canadian? I don't know what you're talking about." ~ In Bruges

reply

I thought she looked horrible too. Looked too thin and sickly to be a believable top assassin. Actually, only movie I've ever thought she looked good in was Hackers.


The Secret Is In The Frosting... But I'll Never Tell!

reply

I guess that the real problem you are having is that you really don't like angelina. I agree that she looks super skinny and not to her favor I may say but for me she looks fine. Not like she used to be but she looks pretty anyway

reply

In my opinion, the grossness had nothing to do with the fact that she was too thin - it was those tattoos. They made her look trashy and disgusting.

I'm fabulous

reply