Whoa, I am the 1st


I love this movie

reply

Anymore comments than just loving it?
I like it, too, but technically, there is a bug of the movie: when Fang qiangqiang sneaked out of the room and went for a pee on the ground, it was snowy, while all children were wearing coats as it was spring or summer.

reply

does anybody have its english subtitle? could you please please please send it to me if you have? thanks... [email protected]

reply

Little Red Flowers

reply

i think the snow was just in Qing's dreams.

reply

Yes, it was. That is not clear the first time, but after the second time he is shown to have wet the bed, and talks about defeating something (cannot remember what) with his pee. He doesn't mention snow, and the footage doesn't show him peeing on anything else, but it's still likely that it is supposed to be a dream.

reply

here's a tip, weilonging - why dont you try a technique called suspesion of disbelief? You clearly have trouble grasping the fact that not everything you see in films is supposed to actually have happened...

reply

I wholeheartedly agree.

reply

Just saw the movie and liked it.
The scene when they are caught playing doctors and nurses made me chuckle, especially the stern teacher's reaction when she tells the girl off for participating.
However, I thought the ending was too abrupt, almost as though they ran out of ideas how to finish it, so just ended it.

reply

"However, I thought the ending was too abrupt, almost as though they ran out of ideas how to finish it, so just ended it."
Most definitely. Xx

reply

One thing I found bizarre which someone might be able to answer was why the boy's outdoor trousers had splits exposing them?

And it did end way too abruptly like they'd run out of ideas/time! It left me feeling frustrated and disappointed as I'd found it an enjoyable film.

reply


Yes indeed it was a wonderful enjoyable film...in english its title was..

"Little Red Flowers".

I also noticed the split in the little boys pants, was it for easier to pee? ;)

And I also could not understand why such a sudden ending? I have only just watched it and really loved it, the young actors were amazing especially little Fang, adorable!.Dong Bowen was this remarkable young actor, well done!

At the end Fang went to the hospital, then we see him in a empty room all alone, resting on a stone block of sorts..I felt cheated, as this was such a delightful film.

Can anyone explain the ending please?.

reply

I took it to mean that, for the kids, there was no ending, no way out and no hope for those could not conform. He seemed to lay down in despair.




















i

reply


Thankyou, actually that does make a lot of sense, I wish they would make a

"Little Red Flowers" 2, as it was so enjoyable..And maybe we we could see what became of Fang and the others!, hope so.

reply

this is the way I saw it - a story of a little boy who did not "fit in" to the strict, regimented upbringing in the kindergarden. At first, he tried very hard and he wanted more than anything to earn his little red flowers, which symbolized fitting in, or conforming as people on this board have called it.

Then, one day with one of his little girl friends, he discovers freedom as they escape from the school and explore the outside world as children should- in all its innocence and splendour.

After this experience, the little boy turns a little more rebellious at school. He starts acting out, hitting, being disruptive, finally culminating in the scene where he tells the teacher to *beep* off. Then he gets a very cruel punishment, when the teachers lock him in the dark scary room and plan to keep him "isolated" from the other kids. This moment, i think is representative also of how China deals with dissenters. People who do not conform are also shunned from society.

When the little boy is allowed to return to the class, he once again immediately acts out by pushing someone in line and then running away again, this time on his own. He goes to the hospital (also a symbolic place) and then sees in what was once his "paradise" - a march of adults all of whom are wearing - BIG RED FLOWERS on their uniforms.

Earlier, the teachers at the school told him that kindergarden is the best time of life and he will understand this when he grows. But until then, life in the kinderdargden has been pretty miserable for him. And now the boy sees that in the adult world, people still look like marching synchronized robots whos purpose in life is just earning those damned red flowers. He goes to lay down alone in an empty room on the cold hard stones, in despair. The ending of this film paints a bleak picture of society and the future of these children.

So I think in this way, the ending was not too abrupt and it was fitting. Overall, i thought the story was nice especially the way it captured childhood. Who did not want to just reach out and hug that little boy so many times? What a great actor.

reply

>why the boy's outdoor trousers had splits exposing them?

Pants with a giant hole are known in Chinese as "kaidangku" (literally "open-crotch pants").

One might even catch a Chinese toddler relieving himself, right on the street. Visitors may find this disgusting, or delightful, but they may not see such sights any longer, at least in the cities.

China's famous split pants may soon be eclipsed by the disposable diaper. Urban consumers are deploying the diaper and making China one of the world's fastest growing markets.

Just about all of the babies who grace China's sleek parenting magazines are wearing diapers.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-07/16/content_349150.htm

http://dancarlinca.tripod.com/index.blog/1498315/chinese-style-point-5 -crotchless-kids-pants/kaidangku.jpg

http://kimono.takagiryoko.com/images/kaidangku.jpg ?

reply

At times I felt Little Red Flowers was too one dimensional. Scene after scene the focus was on Qain being made to feel humiliated and isolated. I understand it is an allegory for Communism but it felt repeative to the point where it became awkward to watch.

"I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not".

reply