I LOVE LOVE LOVE Christoph Waltz. I am a die hard fan, and I so want to see every film he is in....but I don't really like films with nudity in it. I find it distasteful, that is why I would like to know so I don't get my hopes up to high..
Xoxox
So that's makes you 13 right?
So, that makes you thirteen right? *
You are welcome, I corrected your grammar for you.
Also, I am not thirteen, I am twenty, but thanks for asking.
:)
[deleted]
[deleted]
There has to be nudity regardless if it is necessary to the plot or not. How else do you get men to watch a costume drama about flowers?
I'm sorry to tell you it won't be Judy Densch and Tom Hollander. It will be Cara Delevingne and Matthew Morrison (Mr Shu from Glee).
I don't know everything. Neither does anyone else
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
Lmao what a prude. You poor thing.
shareMaybe I am a prude, but it's sad you have the need to insult someone through the Internet. Have a great day!
:)
Bbethany7 The tulips will be unclothed. No doubt Chrstoph Waltz will drop his trousers to flop his thingy
and dance across the screen.. Btw, if nudity bothers you I suggest you watch either cartoons or restrict films
to those set in the 19th century or earlier. Another way to avoid nudity is to seek out movies with Dame May Witty, Zasu Pitts, and Margaret Rutherford. ;-) BB
Oh I don't know. A nice rated-R flick with some nudity involving Mr. Waltz would be anything but distasteful to me.
Save the trees. Wipe your ass with owls!
Unlikely they would show him nude. They always show females naked. I just really don't feel the want to sit through a movie with a bunch of sex scenes. It's annoying. That's the only reason I ask.
shareSo you obviously haven't seen Christoph in Feuer und Schwert: Die legende von Tristan und Isolde (Fire and Sword) from 1981?
shareI haven't seen it no. It is my to do list to watch all his movies...if that's a German movie, then of course I don't have easy access to it because I'm from America. But thanks for letting me know, I suppose.
No thanks required, more of a warning though. Waltz was 26 years old in this debut and the film was available in America on a double disc DVD several years ago. It now is out of print but it is interesting, though hence the warning, that in the original German version he appears VERY naked, whereas in the American version he does not as that bath scene was removed from that print version. But that said, even then he was very good in that film version of the classic tragic love story of Tristan and Isolde, and it is a fine film to track down.
shareI guess I'll have to check it out, if I can get a copy of it. But as I said before not a big nudity fan! But Thank you!
shareIncorrect. Men are naked much more often in longer durations and in lighting that lends itself better to the eye; if you count male nipples, the ratio would go up more drastically in favor of male nudity, but shirtless men are not considered nude. Women appear full frontal more often, I give you that, but they never show their bare buttocks while every other movie seems to exhibit a man's rear. It is simply made out to be a bigger deal if a woman appears nude on film, so it seems like they are nude more often.
I like my phone like my dreams... dead.
I wont complaint if Alicia Vikander gets naked...
shareEnglish language films really rarely have male full frontal nudity, especially big studio films like this one (Weinstein). If there's any nudity it will probably be of Alicia. I mean, there's sure to be lots of implied nudity and sexual content. It's a shame, some of the best films have a scene of two with some nudity. It doesn't define the film, but as nudity is an essential part of life, it is also a part of film.
shareI think we have to remember that the female equivalent of male full frontal is a spread leg view of the vertical bacon sandwich. Those you RARELY seen either.
I mean if you consider the prosthetic snatch-patches they wear on GoT, you aren't seeing anything. I mean. Female anatomy would have it that there's nothing there at the front. lol
So what you get is tits and some butt. And you see plenty of man-butt too. And men have nipples too if that's your thing.
I can't say I care if there's naked people on screen or not. Sex for the sake of sex and nudity does however get tiresome. And then I find myself thinking of how awkward that particular scene must've been to shoot. If I want porn I'll go download porn. lol
OP however is a total prude. lol Just stay away from TV and media in general, OP. For the rest of your life and spare your delicate innocent eyes. lol
It might not have been the OP's goal to discuss it, but this is actually quite a hot topic in cinema lately. The MPAA has a tendency to crack down on films with sexual content, so there is rarely ever nudity of any kind in PG-13 films. Yet on TV, particularly on the premium channels, there are very few (if any) restrictions. Then the issue becomes, how far can you push it before it becomes gratuitous or "distasteful"?
What I'd say to the OP is: To avoid nudity altogether is to seriously limit your exposure to great films. I've seen films where nudity is done very well, and films where I have indeed found it distasteful. I may be more jaded than most viewers on here, I have watched the likes of Game of Thrones and Shame (2011) with my father. Now, I'm not saying you should seek them out, but to pass on films like Braveheart, Titanic, The English Patient, Shakespeare in Love, etc. because they contain scenes of nudity seems a real shame to me.
If I had to hazard a guess of the trailers, I'd say there will be at least one love scene in this film. What you do with that information is up to you. I think the movie looks pretty good.
"Long days and pleasant nights!"
[deleted]
[deleted]