I also had my doubts about answering this post but here I go.
I know something about this matter. When the bull gets spired is because of a reason, not a ransom form of cruelty. The bull gets out with so many energy (some call it bravery) that it can get a strike in the muscules, like its legs been paralysed. The spear makes the blood flow in order to avoid this congestion. It's weird but true. You may not believe me but it happens, I've seen it. Of course, that lowing of energy allows that the matador's performance would be more "stetical". But ask a matador and certainly he can't use a weakened bull, because it wouldn't help him in his performance.
Besides, the bull DOES have the chance to survive. According to its qualities, its life would be forgiven.
And the matador DOES have the same chance to die. History is full of examples.
When the bull is dead, the people and the president (or judge) would "rank" the performance of the matador. The ear is a level in this rank. There are no numbers or points. The matador can give that "trophy" to whoever he wants, not particularly children. Besides, in Spain, young kids under 10 or 12 years old are not allowed to go to bullfights.
ALSO, inside the culture of Tauromaquia there are many other practices:
Rejoneo: The "matador" is riding a horse. In Portugal, the cradle of this practice, is forbidden to kill a bull so they do their performance and the bull returns to the field.
Pega de forcados: Also created in Portugal. A group of men fights a bull. With their bare hands the men try to stop a bull. By the end one of them plays with the bull by holding to the bull's tail in order to be dragged. They don't bleed the bull and it returns to the field.
Toro embolado: Practiced in the south of France. It's an athletic practice in which men dressed in white compete in order to get a ribbon that is between the horns of the bull. They run and jump in a ring. Very stetic and there's no harm to the bull.
As you can see, the culture of bulls is very rich in that part of Europe and there are many practices, not only the bullfight, which has a story of it's own.
There are many things that people outside this environment doesn't know and can easily misunderstood.
I'm open to all opinions but I don't just get mad and quick to answer with anger (or irony). I'd be an hypocrit if I just say "yes" or "no", "cruelty" or "tradition". First I have to know what I'm about to talk, and not to answer without knowing the subject or because that is pollitical correct.
Now, you would think: "This one thinks bullfights are right, the fellow is on favor, and would desperatly defend what I think it's barbarically wrong". Well, to your surprise, I'm not. It's just that I don't see the world in black and white. I recognize the amount of fine art inspired in bullfights: Literature like Hemingway's, paintings and sculpture like Goya's, Picasso's and Gernica's; music, gastronomy, clothing modes.
Anyway, my answer is: It may be cruel and it may be a tradition, a bit of both. It can be a tradition that can have it's own evolution according to this modern times.
How? Let's have bullfights, let's not kill the bull.
Naive? A bit. The supreme task of killing can be done with a retractile sword that marks the place where it hits so that the people can judge, but without killing the bull.
It's an idea.
Hope this may help.
Good luck.
reply
share