Very bad movie


I just watched this on Sundance. The on-screen program guide listed another movie titled GHOST WRITER (1989) and that's what I expected to see. But on came the 2007 Alan Cumming film, totally unrelated to the earlier one. The cast list in the opening credits looked very interesting, so I watched it.

I was not surprised that it was so bad -- I've seen plenty of bad movies -- but I couldn't understand why anyone would finance a movie directed by non-director Alan Cumming. And worse, he's also the star! How can an inexperienced director helm a movie in which he's in 99% of it? (I know Laurence Olivier did it with HAMLET, but Olivier is a far cry from Cumming.) The movie's low budget was also a major hindrance.

Cumming was terrible as a director and acted extremely badly in many of his scenes. Of course, the writing didn't help. Only a few actors were able to escape the silliness of their roles. David Boreanez and Ann Heche were able to create credible characters and almost rise above the dreck they were required to speak. But the movie rested on the shoulders of Cumming, and he made a mess of it.

Alan, go back to musicals and light comedies. And next time, work with a good director.

reply

I just saw it for the first time also... It was titled as "Ghost Writer" on Sundance and said that Jeff Conaway was going to be in it. I wondered if Jeff Conaway was a decent actor and a looker in his day and I actually thought that Sebastian was actually Conaway for a while. The film was peculiar. Interesting enough to keep my attention..

It's a one-legged race to the liquor store
It's just a hop, skip and jump into the tomb

reply

Almost everything was terrible in this movie, except for Heche's performance. The screenplay, acting, and music were laughable! I can't believe trash like this could be made today. It's not even good enough to be a B-movie!!!

Eerily, the set made me feel like the movie "Deathtrap," which was excellent. No idea why.

http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=3319566

reply

I agree it was a VERY bad film. But since I watched it on a library DVD I had the advantage on fast forwarding. I stopped occasionally to see if there was anything to salvage but it was such a mess.

reply

You're too easy on Cumming here. He should buy all rights to this disgusting piece of trash & hide it forever. It's sick, sadistic, ugly, horribly written, terribly acted, & an embarrassment to all listed in the credits. Who at Sundance thought it deserved to be aired? Curse them, whoever they are. Easily the worst film I've seen this year.

reply

Yeah, this has to be one of the worst things I've ever seen ever

I may be love's bitch but at least I'm man enough to admit it. -Spike

reply

[deleted]

Glad it's not just me! I saw the first 10 minutes and I couldn't watch any more as it was so painfully awful. I loved Alan Cumming in GoldenEye, The High Life and A Word in Your Era.

"Hey! Ladies! That was fun!"

reply

I agree that Cumming (usually so watchable) gave an abysmally OTT performance. I thought that Karen Black was good in her small cameo (seducing Boreanaz- almost 30 years her junior). I'm assuming Carrie Fisher is a friend of Cummings and only did the tiny role of the reporter as a favour. A misfire, I'm afraid.

reply

I liked it,i liked it a lot,it is a really good dark comedy,completely underrated,alan Cumming was awesome in this,it has some flaws but to me it is a high 7

reply