As a soldier...


why would you even complain and gripe about stop-loss. It is called reading the contract before you sign it. That goes for every branch of service if your needed they will get you.

For one thing if your in the military you know how the paperwork goes and you would have gone and come back before it even gets pushed through. Just my opinion.

Also, are people that have inactive duty going to be complaining if they get called back on a critical MOS?

You be the sinner, I'll be your sin.

reply

As a former soldier, I think a stop loss is *beep* up to say the least. If you sign up for a certain amount of time then by all means you should have to serve your time. Why would you have to serve additional time? Does that work anywhere else in this world? No. not at all. Anyway, just my opinion. I loved this movie!

I like to think I am really smart, especially after some booze!

reply

Read your contract, no matter how many active you sign up for you are serving for 8. It's clear as can be, I saw it and I understood it.

reply

[deleted]

Let me put it like this. Two of my brothers served in VietNam. They signed the same contract the soldiers are signing now. But no one held my brothers in active duty longer than they anticipated. Sure, they could have been reactivated and redeployed should a national emergency have arisen, but it didn't and they weren't. My father, on the other hand, served in WWII. He served until the end of the war + so many months. That was clearly understood. He was then in inactive service for several years. Once again, clearly understood.

Don't talk to us about it being right there in the contract. There's alot of stuff right there in the contract. Anyone taking it to a lawyer for review? I don't think so. And are the recruitment personnel pointing that clause out? Yeah, sure they are. A soldier entering the army, particularly coming from a military family as Brandon is supposed to be in this film, would have expectations based upon the military's previous policies.

And I must add that this film is about alot more than the length of a soldier's service. It explores the depth of sacrifice that the soldiers, and by extension their families, are making. It examines the human cost of war. Put aside your hang up on the validity of the Stop-Loss clause and watch this film for that. The scene with Rico and Brandon in the military hospital is worth seeing the movie in order to experience.

"I'd never ask you to trust me. It's the cry of a guilty soul."

reply

Don't talk to us about it being right there in the contract. There's alot of stuff right there in the contract. Anyone taking it to a lawyer for review? I don't think so. And are the recruitment personnel pointing that clause out? Yeah, sure they are.
You shouldn't need to take it to a lawyer for review- one of the requirements to join is being able to read and understand the contract. It's not rocket science. Anyone who thinks "recruiting personnel" are responsible for holding a potential recruit's hand through the contract needs to grow up and realize that adults read and sign their own contracts.

Anyone who does not realize they sign up for 8 years has nobody but themselves to blame.

The night is a very dark time for me.

reply

i dunno... i have huge, massive respect for anyone in the armed services (always liked men in uniform lol) but i don't know enough on stop loss to comment other than when it comes to matter of life and death, which i see the services role as, i don't think such a harsh point of contract should be strictly adhered to...

just my opinion....

www.bebo.com/journeysendlimerick
De inimico non loquaris sed cogites

reply

I was Army in Afghanistan. This is an unjust stupid war. That's why almost 1/4 now go awol rather than be stop loss. Use your head. If this war goes on for much longer more of us will be killed, and for what.

reply

That's not for you to question, soldier. I was with USMC 2/7 in Afghanistan last year. That place (and Iraq, too, probably..) f[u]cking sucks but do your time and get out. Or take your dishonorable discharge and peace out.

reply

Exactly, Chounch. I'd remind any military person that their oath of enlistment includes the phrase "to obey the orders of the President and all officers appointed over me". This does not change if you disagree with the orders. You either obey those orders, or you get a court-martial. It's simple as that.

This movie makes no sense to those that actually served. A "stop-loss" is a condition where your MOS (military occupation specialty) is too important for the service to release you from active duty. Contrary to this obvious anti-war propaganda film, the military will NOT let you go home. You are merely retained at your current command for a short time past the end of your obligated service (EOS). THAT is "stop-loss".

One more thing: every recruiter is required by law to inform their candidates of the requirement to serve 8 years (regardless of how much active duty time is served). If you serve all 8 in active duty, then there is no further obligation. However, if you only serve 2 years active duty, then the remaining 6 years will be in an inactive non-drilling status. However, for those 6 years the military can recall you back to serve. If you refuse, you will be arrested and tried at court-martial for failing to follow orders. I enlisted as a 17 year old High School Senior and I understood this completely. If someone didn't get it, then they are just too dumb to serve anyway.

In the future, I hope this director would do some real research before they put out another fact-bending fluff piece.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

"10. MILITARY SERVICE OBLIGATION FOR ALL MEMBERS OF THE ACTIVE AND RESERVE COMPONENTS, INCLUDING THE NATIONAL GUARD.

a. FOR ALL ENLISTEES: If this is my initial enlistment, I must serve a total of eight (8) years. Any part of that service not served on active duty must be served in a Reserve Component unless I am sooner discharged.

b. If I am a member of a Reserve Component of an Armed Force at the beginning of a period of war or national emergency declared by Congress, or if I become
a member during that period, my military service may be extended without my consent until six (6) months after the end of that period of war.

c. As a member of a Reserve Component, in time of war or national emergency declared by the Congress, I may be required to serve on active duty (other than for training) for the entire period of the war or emergency and for six (6) months after its end.

d. As a member of the Ready Reserve I may be required to perform active duty or active duty for training without my consent (other than as provided in item 8 of this document) as follows:
(1) in time of national emergency declared by the President of the United States, I may be ordered to active duty (other than for training) for not more than 24 consecutive months."
Section C.10.a/b/c/d
ENLISTMENT/REENLISTMENT DOCUMENT ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES
DD Form 4/3 Revised Jan 2001

Key words.

"I must serve a total of eight (8) years. Any part of that service not served on active duty must be served in a Reserve Component unless I am sooner discharged. In time of national emergency declared by the President of the United States, I may be ordered to active duty (other than for training) for not more than 24 consecutive months."

This document is read and signed at the time that a service member enlists into the Delayed Entry program (What most High School Seniors Enlist into). Then this form is read and signed again at the MEPS or Military Entrance Processing Station when you transition to active duty.

Every service member knows they have an 8 year obligation. It isn't hidden. it isn't swept under the rug. And any extension of your service or reactivation has prior warning. You don't go in on your last day to turn in your gear and find out you are being extended. You have months of advanced warning of such an occasion. And it doesn't require a declaration of war like they tried to portray in the movie. It only takes "In time of national emergency declared by the President of the United States".

reply

I'm in the army too, and I understood that completely. I serve 6 active, 2 inactive, but I can be extended on active duty or recalled to active duty at any time. Clear as day.

Although, if everyone was smart enough to read and understand contracts, our economy wouldn't have collapsed so violently either.

reply

Couldn't agree more.

I'm pissed off and the whole world owes me!

reply

1/4 go AWOL?

Dude, I've been to Afghanistan twice and am currently deployed.

Never heard of 25% of the military going AWOL.

Think you need to check your figures because I am pretty sure such a huge number would be on every front page of every newspaper in America.

reply

AmmoChick,

I think your views are a little extreme even for a soldier.

Not sure what your MOS is or if you have been deployed.

I can speak from experience of myself and guys I know.

After numerous tours of duty being deployed and seeing dozens of your friends killed and injured you look forward to getting out. After numerous tours and constantly being shelled and bombed and shot at and watching 8 of your buddies burn alive in a Stryker right before your eyes after hitting an IED you are looking forward to the end of the madness.

Stop loss is meant to insure trained soldiers are ready of action in case the US is attacked, i.e. Pearl Harbor. It was not meant to be used as a political tool to keep guys in.

To be told you are being returned to the madness after numerous tours of duty right after you have come home and are expecting to join the civilian world and work for your dreams and goals is a trigger. It incites anger and disappointment.

That's the story. I do disagree with anyone going AWOL. I disagree with anyone trying to escape their duty. It would be nice if the brass would allow those the need to be used in such things as training rather then send them straight back into war.

I've had several friends that got their notice of stop loss. That notification is a knife in the heart.

reply

Twice 2005 and 2008.

I was just saying that everybody knows the deal with stop-loss if they are in, but as of current stop-loss is not in effect any longer. You have a point though, I don't want to be in war with one that dosent' want to be there. For those of you who think why would anybody 'want' to be there, if you are in you'll get what I am saying, if not sorry that your confused.

"I will not give in to the true death."

reply

(because recruiters for the most part are slimballs trying to make their quota)
I've had two brothers join the army. Both times the recruiters (two different guys I might add) showed up at our house and telling us that they would never go to war or see a hotspot unless they chose to. We should have known all four of them were liars

reply

As a woman who is in a family of a long line of soldiers, I find ANYONE who says they were "duped" into their contractual obligations to be liars. I was there the day my brother signed, my cousin signed, and my sister. They were VERY specific, you sign knowing that your in for 8 years min. For anyone who says they were lied to, and that going to a "hot spot" or serving in a war would be a choice, is a liar! You are a soldier, this is what you signed up for.

reply

My annoyed comment (see below) was in response to Rachel090 who claimed recruiters lie. I am not sure how my comment landed here. I would remove it, except it might then remove the comment tagged onto mine.

My Navy recruiter was very careful to explain every detail -- and I am sure the other services make sure they convey all of the facts. I tried to join the medical corp, but the Navy was downsizing during peacetime -- I did not get a commission.

I regret not serving, and am in awe of everyone who serves, especially while we have active wars. Y'all have my heart.

Here was my rant directed at Rachel090:
"Why don't you enlist, and then get stop-lossed before you smart off at those who have served our nation -- unlike you who hasn't lifted a finger to help anyone, probably ever. But I doubt that anything could help you become human."

reply

i was stop lossed for almost a year and it was cool because i got an extra 500 a month plus an extra 1000 a month for being deployed over a year. it sucked having to stay longer but the money was awesome

reply

Thank you for your service. And your good attitude about being kept in hostile territory for a near extra year.

reply

Also, if you've read the contract you know you've signed up for up to eight years of duty, one type or another. It would seem to me that stop-loss wouldn't have been a surprise, although sure as hell a disappointment. The whole movie is based on the idea that stop-loss is somehow illegal. It may be the pits, but it's not illegal.

reply