MovieChat Forums > Who Killed the Electric Car? (2006) Discussion > PLEASE sign PETITION it is essential

PLEASE sign PETITION it is essential


Please sign this petition

http://www.change.org/petitions/we-want-zero-emission-100-electric-cars-now

If you go to the site and scroll down you will see an explaining comment
under my name Howard Marks. Once the NiMH battery is liberated it is an engineering fact that an ALL Electric version of the latest Cadillac would go just as far on an all electric NiMH based system only with more torque and at a lower purchase price than the current gasoline version.
Why do you think CHEVRON has been so insistant on keeping the NimH battery from the world? If it was not capable of going hundreds of miles on a charge CHEVRON OIL would have never cared enough to use patent tyranny to imprison it.

reply

I have written about this issue quite a while back. In fact, the original (old) FAQ page on the Cobasys website is still there:

http://www.cobasys.com/pdf/faq/faq.html

It explains that Cobasys (battery company owned by an oil company) simply will not license their NIMH patents for an electric car. Well, they don't come out and say precisely that, but it's pretty clear they won't approve your NIMH powered EV.

That is, for some reason they wanted to restrict batteries above 10 Amp-Hours only to projects they specifically approved. It's a strange position, because they were restricting sales of their own product by doing this. Every other battery maker simply sells batteries to whoever wants them. A Wiki on the NIMH patent encumbrance issue is here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_encumbrance_of_large_automotive_Ni MH_batteries

However, this is now a very old issue, and I suspect, no longer even very relevant. Lithium batteries are now readily available for EVs, and mostly superior to NIMH batteries. Most of the most important lithium battery patents are held in Asia, too hard (apparently) for oil companies to easily acquire.

The patents for NIMH have changed hands a couple more times, and are now controlled by BASF corporation, who appears much more willing to license them. However, in all likelihood, these patents (from the early nineties) will be expiring soon. This is the event to wait for, rather than trying to get the government involved in liberating them.

If there's any remaining value in this technology, it will arise from the low-cost manufacture made possible by the expiration of NIMH patents.

The original inventor of the technology, Stanley Ovshinsky (I once met him) felt that NIMH could be manufactured very inexpensively. Soon we may find out if this is true.

reply

Your only error is that CHEVRON still have a VETO over the current owners.
When did selling something ever mean retaining power AFTER sale its madness!

reply

...Your only error is that CHEVRON still have a VETO over the current owners.

Yes, good point. I may sign your petition, however, a Google check tells me the most important NIMH patents expire by 2014.

It's not likely any attempt to take control of the patents will succeed much sooner than this, anyway.

Indeed, such an attempt could give someone in the government an excuse to find a way to control the patents long after they should have expired.

I'm more afraid that some sort of backfire like this could happen. I'd rather just let the patents expire on their own.

reply

Please sign and get your friends to. Far too much time lapsed already.
This technology needs to be public domain for all of humanity. Neither the ecology nor the economy can wait. I am not associated with the people who put up the petition its the battery and its applications I care about.

reply

[deleted]