MovieChat Forums > Sasquatch Mountain (2006) Discussion > Over-exposed, too high contrast, blue, l...

Over-exposed, too high contrast, blue, low res


FILMAKERS, This IS the worst film for make-this-film-distinct "colour tint," colour incorrection, or whatever it is called.
When you watch the making of (and what's with that every-time-the-scene-moves-the-pic-slides-apart-in-about-5-horizontally-bars phenomenon that's impossible yet they did it?), the HD definition and natural colour is superb and makes that amateur-look like 8mm film.
You use that in SHORT spurts, if you want it to evoke Patterson's film or anything, when appropriate to the scene.

It's almost unwatchable. Blacking out half the picture like the pissant presets of all TVs you have to correct (well I do), and making it as blue as the ocean almost. Not being able to see what you normally could outside a building window (at the beginning), just overexposure. Half the scenary missing.
It's ugly and like the camera operater hasn't learnt even the basics.
I had to wince again seeing the end credits saying HD Cinema.

Seconded only by AVP 2 where they also half-wrecked what they spent hard hours filming by over-darkening it.

Hey what about re-releasing it properly without the post-production bad fashion?

reply

I fully agree man, the blue look of this movie was god awful.

Gimbos The Name & Horror Is My Thing!

reply