MovieChat Forums > Spring Break Massacre Discussion > Anything to do with slumber party massac...

Anything to do with slumber party massacre or sorority house massacre??


Im confused if this movie is going to have anything to do with those serires. Any idea??

reply

It's a spoof/satire on the Corman Slumber Party/Sorority Party series.

reply

Thats what I was wondering

reply

Its more of a tribute to those films :) or atleast thats what I got out of it.

reply

Yeah, it's like someone watched ALL the old '___ ____ massacre' films from the 80s, got his friends together with NO money for any of it, and called it a movie.

At least the 80s versions had SOME money to spend on fake blood or props or something. This had no HINT of any of that.

I wanted to like it as i'm a big fan of those old massacre movies as well. But unfortunately, this was too slow, too poorly written (even for a massacre tribute), and despite the fact that effects are easier to do now, we don't even get ANY.

Have your fast forward button on call if you decide to watch this for some reason. This seems to have been filmed all in one afternoon. If it took any longer than that, you'd never tell by the result on the screen.

4/10, just for the nudity. Without that, a 1 or 2 sounds about right... not cheesy enough to be fun, not serious enough to be a good movie.



"Look, Hank. Have you ever seen such a beautifully punted baby?" - King of the Hill

reply

i loved this one - in a bad way of course.

maybe people that didn't watch this director's earlier stuff wouldn't appreciate it.

i've heard all kinds of complaints from "lack of gore" etc...and while - yes - the movie isn't bloody - it's hilariously bad - in a good way. i think they did it on purpose.

of course - it's better than most micro budget b movies - they actually got celebrities, a real police station and prison set - plus 2 of the girls are hot.

i don't know why i waited to rent this - but the bad comments on netflix made me think the director had sold out or something.

this has all the requisite bad dialogue, nudity and more i'd expect - plus reggie bannsiter and linnea quigley together in there scenes.

80's - please come back. we need u!!!!!

reply

it's hilariously bad - in a good way. i think they did it on purpose


No way was it on purpose, it's just as bad as it is because it's that bad. I'm not knocking it because for a very low budget film it was fine, I enjoyed watching it. I didn't understand the connection with the Dad running amuck at the end though. That just seemed to make no sense to me. Was it just as simple as Daddy was a bit of a psycho. Maybe that's just all it was and there's nothing to get. I'm taking that way I think, as I type this.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]