Last Cutscene


In the last cutscene, Answers Breed Questions, when Lara sees her mother in the portal, is that her mother from the time when they were both in the Himalayas? And if so, does that mean that Lara and Amanda were having a conversation with Lara's mother from twenty years ago? And THAT's why she pulled out the sword? Because Amanda swore the portal would explode if she didn't?

reply

Pretty much.

Though it seems to me Amanda wasn't actually trying to kill Lara's mom. She was telling dumbass Lara to pull out the sword, but the buxom brit was too focused on mum to listen.

Misplaced rage, Lara. Misplaced.

Emmy Rossum: Enraging fatties since 2004.

reply

Ah. Makes much more sense now. Amanda is a treacherous bitch, yet at the end, the biggest revelation is that she has feelings for someone besides herself and Rutland. Lol. However, I DO hope Lara beats the SH!T out of Amanda. I just want to see the little slut die a very violent death. :)

reply

Amanda is actually the hero of the story. Most people won't tell you that one.

Emmy Rossum: Enraging fatties since 2004.

reply

She saved Lara's mother. Whoopy. I don't care about Lara's mother anyway. Kill her off. I don't care. It would actually make the story more interesting and emotional. So what else has Amanda done? Jack SH!T. That's what. Screw the blonde b!tch. Let her die a Final Destination death. =)

reply

She's the hero because she's protecting the world from the ravaging hand of Lara Croft, Tomb Raider.

Emmy Rossum: Enraging fatties since 2004.

reply

How is she "protecting the world from ravaging hands" when she is doing the same thing? Amanda is actually worse. She will do anything to get what she wants. At least Lara won't kill anyone to get what she wants. I mean, I know she kills people, but if she doesn't, she will BE killed by them. Amanda is the type of person who would just pull a gun, bust a cap, and walk on her merry way. She is a heartless bitch. I just really hope Lara kills her ugly white trash ass in the sequel.

reply

How is she "protecting the world from ravaging hands" when she is doing the same thing?


Amanda's just doing what she has to do, and she's not pretending to do it for good reasons the way Lara does.

Amanda is actually worse. She will do anything to get what she wants. At least Lara won't kill anyone to get what she wants.


Lara kills all the time, even when she doesn't have to. And most of the time it's while she's after something she doesn't need, that doesn't belong to her.

I mean, I know she kills people, but if she doesn't, she will BE killed by them.


Dangerous people she purposely puts herself in the way of.

Amanda is the type of person who would just pull a gun, bust a cap, and walk on her merry way.


Lara blasted Larson in Anniversary because he wouldn't get out of her way. Seems pretty cold to me.

She is a heartless bitch.


When has Lara shown any heart? She's an ice queen who steals national treasures for the fun of it.

I just really hope Lara kills her ugly white trash ass in the sequel.


I hope it's the other way around, actually.

Emmy Rossum: Enraging fatties since 2004.

reply

Amanda is just doing what she has to do? Who the hell said she HAD to do ANYTHING? SHE put herself in the same situation as well. And also, Lara doesn't pretend to do things for good reasons. She is upfront. And yes, Lara DOES put herself in dangerous situations, but she only plays for sport. You are defending Amanda because Lara takes things that don't belong to her. Well the psycho bitch Amanda doesn't have a right to any of those relics and/or artifacts either. And like I was saying, Lara puts herself in dangerous situations, but the mercenaries and other people she kills almost always are a bigger threat to the world and society and if Lara doesn't prevent them from world domination or something else, then WHO THE HELL WILL? And yes, Lara DID bust a cap in Larson's sorry ass in Anniversary, but if she didn't HE would kill HER. AND Natla would be well on her way with her plan to rebuild the army of Atlantis and wipe out the world's population. And Lara CLEARLY felt remorse over killing Larson. She nearly cried. She didn't WANT to kill him, but she knew she had to in order to A) prevent him from killing her, and B) to prevent Natla from spreading harm to the world. Lara has also shown compassion in various levels. "Someone picked an unfortunate place to hunt," for instance, and she was talking about an ANIMAL. She also felt really bad for killing Rutland. She apologized to Amanda for doing it. If she had INTENDED to kill him and didn't give a FLYING F#CK she would have been more likely to say something along the lines of, "Ah, the stupid bastard deserved it." And finally, Lara will never die, except during gameplay. They will NEVER end a Tomb Raider game with her dying. Amanda is a disposable, cutthroat bitch, and should die a very violent death in the sequel. :)

reply

Amanda is just doing what she has to do? Who the hell said she HAD to do ANYTHING?


Who said Lara had to do anything either?

SHE put herself in the same situation as well. And also, Lara doesn't pretend to do things for good reasons. She is upfront. And yes, Lara DOES put herself in dangerous situations, but she only plays for sport. You are defending Amanda because Lara takes things that don't belong to her.


So it's okay for Lara to act like a bad guy because she admits to it, but it's not okay for Amanda?

Well the psycho bitch Amanda doesn't have a right to any of those relics and/or artifacts either. And like I was saying, Lara puts herself in dangerous situations, but the mercenaries and other people she kills almost always are a bigger threat to the world and society and if Lara doesn't prevent them from world domination or something else, then WHO THE HELL WILL? And yes, Lara DID bust a cap in Larson's sorry ass in Anniversary, but if she didn't HE would kill HER. AND Natla would be well on her way with her plan to rebuild the army of Atlantis and wipe out the world's population.


Lara doesn't do anything for the right reason. She's either pissed at someone for something and trying to upset their plans out of revenge, or she's trying to repair her father's reputation.

And Lara CLEARLY felt remorse over killing Larson. She nearly cried. She didn't WANT to kill him, but she knew she had to in order to A) prevent him from killing her, and B) to prevent Natla from spreading harm to the world. Lara has also shown compassion in various levels.


She had no reason for killing him. He wouldn't get out of her way so she shot him.

"Someone picked an unfortunate place to hunt," for instance, and she was talking about an ANIMAL. She also felt really bad for killing Rutland. She apologized to Amanda for doing it.


Well. As long as she apologizes afterwards.

If she had INTENDED to kill him and didn't give a FLYING F#CK she would have been more likely to say something along the lines of, "Ah, the stupid bastard deserved it." And finally, Lara will never die, except during gameplay. They will NEVER end a Tomb Raider game with her dying. Amanda is a disposable, cutthroat bitch, and should die a very violent death in the sequel. :)


Amanda is no worse than Lara. And you can argue that she's not even at fault for her subsequent actions as the giant rocks that fell on her head could have caused brain damage, or she could be influenced by the evil demon who hangs out with her. Lara has no such excuse.

Emmy Rossum: Enraging fatties since 2004.

reply

Ah, tralycr_c-1, you're quite the Lara Croft fan, aren't you? And bursting bubbles again I see... you're quite the debater. Whatever will we do with you? Perhaps a nice cup of hot chocolate and a bedtime story before nap time would stop you from being so grumpy all the time. How does that sound? :)

reply

Following me to another board just to bait me. Now who's being the aggressive one? (Note: I deliberately refrained from using that nice little word of yours.)

Emmy Rossum: Enraging fatties since 2004.

reply

I'm not following - I don't even know how to track people on this site. I happen to be a TR fan as well as a matter of fact. I was merely expressing how childish you have been by refusing to listen to other people's opinions. Just because you think they are wrong doesn't mean you should rub their noses in it. I take it from that last post you didn't like me treating you like a child, but if you continue this game of yours I'm afraid I will continue mine. How about a truce? I can see this will be a waste of time for both of us. If you are willing to accept this truce, I will apologise for my posts and perhaps you could stop being so defensive with your replys to other people's posts. It's just a suggestion, please I want this to end.

reply

I'm not following - I don't even know how to track people on this site.


So you conveniently happen to post here right after jumping down my throat on another board?

I happen to be a TR fan as well as a matter of fact. I was merely expressing how childish you have been by refusing to listen to other people's opinions.


I'm not refusing anything. I'm expressing my opinion on the game, which is what I thought the boards were here for.

Just because you think they are wrong doesn't mean you should rub their noses in it.


The other poster responded to me, then I responded. That's how a conversation works. Not agreeing with the other poster does not mean I'm rubbing their nose in it.

I take it from that last post you didn't like me treating you like a child, but if you continue this game of yours I'm afraid I will continue mine.


You are trolling.

How about a truce? I can see this will be a waste of time for both of us. If you are willing to accept this truce, I will apologise for my posts and perhaps you could stop being so defensive with your replys to other people's posts. It's just a suggestion, please I want this to end.


Simple solution, stop responding to me and ignore my posts. You obviously have some problem with me, so it would be better if we both move on.

Emmy Rossum: Enraging fatties since 2004.

reply

Ya know, I quit posting here because I was sick and tired of putting up with your bullsh!t, tralycr c-1. But if you want spyrothedraggon to "stop responding to [you] and ignore [your] posts, then that's all you had to do on this post-war between me and you. Practice what you preach, buddy. It tends to help out morons like yourself. People like you disgust me. You try so hard to be so different just so you can feel better about yourself. Just be yourself and quit trying so hard. It's desperate, deliberate, and annoying.

reply

Ya know, I quit posting here because I was sick and tired of putting up with your bullsh!t, tralycr c-1.


I'd suggest you stop using the internet then if differing points of view are "bullsh!t" to you.

But if you want spyrothedraggon to "stop responding to [you] and ignore [your] posts, then that's all you had to do on this post-war between me and you.


Is that how you kids really see this, as a "post-war?" How do you react in real life when someone doesn't agree with you? Do you punch them?

Also, you could easily have left this topic to die, but you didn't. What does that make you?

Practice what you preach, buddy.


What exactly am I preaching?

It tends to help out morons like yourself. People like you disgust me.


People with opinions?

You try so hard to be so different just so you can feel better about yourself. Just be yourself and quit trying so hard. It's desperate, deliberate, and annoying.


Yawn.

Live Free Or Die Hard = Die Hard In Name Only.

reply

Um... I don't mean to be rude or anything, but most people find that picking apart every single argument they put forward is a bit annoying, and con sometimes make you seem very egotistical(sp). I think that's why they're upset.

reply

Thanks, Darkwolven Warrior. Some people should just be maimed.

reply

Amanda Evert for president 2012!

There is a man...he travels fast...he has purpose...he brings violence and destruction.

reply

Um... I don't mean to be rude or anything, but most people find that picking apart every single argument they put forward is a bit annoying, and con sometimes make you seem very egotistical(sp).


Then tell me how to post properly.

Seems to me someone has to be pretty thin-skinned if getting a response on A MESSAGE BOARD offends them.

I think that's why they're upset.


They're upset because they are young and take any disagreement as a personal insult.

Live Free Or Die Hard = Die Hard In Name Only.

reply

Oh my God, this guy is the greatest troll I've seen in a while. And you idiots keep feeding it. "Amanda is the hero"...fantastic!

9/10 for you, good sir.

reply

[deleted]

Not really interested in joining the argument 'cause that's really lame, but I was just wondering about something.

Amanda told Lara to pull out the sword, so surely, if she had she would've been transported to Avalon instead of or as well as her mother, wouldn't she? Why would Amanda want Lara to pull out the sword with the chance that Lara will end up when Amanda was supposed to go?

reply

I think at the moment Amanda was more interested in not blowing up or losing the sword. Of course it's possible she didn't understand how it worked and assumed it would open up a portal like on Stargate.

Quantum Of Solace - the amount of comfort.

reply

HEY Tralycr. I know people who don't agree with you seem to be giving you alot of crap. I guess thats what opposite-opinions do to people. But i have to say that i do agree with almost everything you said about lara. In my opinion, Lara has always been selfish, she's still a good person, but she's quite selfish. she does put herself in danger but she seems to be good at dodging it though. If you think about it, EVERYTIME she tries to find an artifact, somebody or a bunch of goons are trying to beat her to it. Natla and her obsession with the 7th age, the dude who wanted to reincarnate himself with the dagger of Xian. the dude who turned himself into a big spider on steriods with those keys, Von Croy wanting the Armor of Horus, Amanda and rutland with Avalon and again Natla with the 7th age and Amanda who wants to go to Avalon. If all of these bad forces gain what Lara was trying to acheive, well the world is far more in trouble then it would be if Lara found it first. You know she likes to collect all kinds of old,dusty,dried-out pottery crap right? or donate it to the muesuem. so yea. I'm a Tomb Raider fan, but i dont have to like Lara 100% like everybody here is trying to get YOU to do. we all have opinions and we're not going to agree with each other half the time. I'm just surprised at the level of rudeness these days, people can't avoid calling each other names or being brutal without expressing an opinion. geez.

reply

Well thanks. That's very kind of you.

To clarify, though, I don't think Lara is a villain in every game, but she's walking a fine line when it comes to Legend. Technically, her mother's disappearance and everything that occurs is her fault; yet she's somehow transferred that onto Amanda.

There is a man...he travels fast...he has purpose...he brings violence and destruction.

reply

I can understand THAT part. a little 9 year old, messing with something she should not have and her mother paid for it, but yet she blames Amanda who was really trying to save herself and even Lara whether she wanted to or not, her mother just happen to hear the warning and pulled the sword. I think she should have apologized to Amanda for THAT part.

reply

I think there was an attempt to rectify it in Underworld, but that only made Lara come off worse in Legend since Amanda basically spends the last act of the game trying to save her from Natla.

There is a man...he travels fast...he has purpose...he brings violence and destruction.

reply

Not just as a 9-year-old. Lara reactivates the portal at the end, opening it up to the past despite having no idea what she was doing.

Put simply: Lara killed her mother.

There is a man...he travels fast...he has purpose...he brings violence and destruction.

reply

Troll?

There is a man...he travels fast...he has purpose...he brings violence and destruction.

reply

Don't worry Trufan777, I'm with you even if Tralycr c-1 isn't being nice. She kills to actually save the world and not to hurt it like Amanda. A jaguar is a dangerous predator, you either kill it or you become a snack.

Half-Blood Son of Poseidon, Son of Adam, Gryffindor 7th year and Honorary TR: Underworld fan

reply

How am I not being nice?

There is a man...he travels fast...he has purpose...he brings violence and destruction.

reply