Not bad


I thought Ray Winstone gave a pretty good performance in this, but I think the whole production was a bit limited.

The story used a lot of artistic licence, but even that couldn't save it from essentially being a gorefest. The "deep" parts were dull, and the death parts were much of a muchness.

But I guess there isn't much of a story around a barber who killed people. I think this film tried to trade off the myth surrounding Sweeney Todd, but when you get down to the nuts and bolts there isn't really that much to tell. A bloke killed a lot of people in his shop and ended up taken to the gallows. That's it.

Worth watching if you're a Winstone fan, but I wouldn't see it again.

reply

[deleted]

I think the earlier TV adaptation (1998) by John Schlesinger, with Ben Kingsley and Joanna Lumley, was better. And don't forget the classic version, the one with Tod Slaughter, even if all the videos (VHS or DVD) found in the USA are awful. When this movie is shown on British or French télévision, it is in very sharp condition. I recorded it from "Canal Plus" years ago and the print is excellent...

reply

Less artistic licence then the musical did.

reply

I disagree. This was the best I've seen. Knew of the legend from places like London Dungeons but this is the best film version of the legend I've seen.

reply

I could done without so much gore. As the drama was really good.

reply