MovieChat Forums > State of Play (2009) Discussion > The TOP FIVE ACTORS HAVE TOO MANY FACIAL...

The TOP FIVE ACTORS HAVE TOO MANY FACIAL MOLES?

posted 14 years ago by bear022013-588-696101
11 replies | jump to latest

I gave the film a 10 and I know a wee bit bout the movie business....but here goes.
Rachel McAdams would look much better in HD without all the LARGE facial MOLES...they are a distraction.
The very same can be said of Russell Crowe!
......................... of Helen Mirren and Robin Wright
.......................and of the beautifully thin Ben Affleck.
I do not have any facial moles or marks of any kind on my face,neck or entire body....but I am an aging stunt rider.
Am I being strange or don't you all feel the same about MOLES ON FACES OF
Actors?

[–] notmtwain 14 years ago

You're nuts. You should get rid of your HD player if this sort of thing bothers you. You are talking about some of the best looking men and women on the planet and you focus on nothing.

[–] ReflectedGlory 14 years ago

I thought the growth right between Crowe's eyes was incredibly distracting...I found myself staring at it instead of watching him act lol.

Aaah, buckle this.

[–] Scifi71 14 years ago

Suprised Crowe never had it removed.

[–] gold_nava17 13 years ago

you got to be kidding me please grow up kbye!

[–] ldddhunter 13 years ago

Rachael McAdams is simply gorgeous and also one of my favorite actresses...I also like Russell Crow as well, and I still find him attractive...Ben Affleck doesn't do nothing for me at all...I don't know how in the hell Jennfier Garner is w/him bc she is so stunning and such a versatile actress..Ben is a so-so actor, I recently saw The Town, and he was tolerable in that movie, his acting wasn't too bad... All and all this movie wasn't too bad at all. I loved Russell's acting -- he played a reporter to the tee-- desperate to find the answers and would do anything to solve the mystery..Rachael and Russell had a great chemistry on screen working to solve this mystery...

[–] wildcardgal 13 years ago

You are being strange. Speaking for myself, I care far more about talent.

Let slip the Determined Kitten of Doom!

[–] Scralatchtica 13 years ago

Could you possibly be even more superficial?

All these actors look fine and act fine. Who gives a flying *beep* about the moles on their face. Besides, it gives a face character, especially McAdams. Without them she would just look like another pretty brunette, dime a dozen.

"Too weird to live, and too rare to die..."

[–] blackthirteen 13 years ago

You can kiss my hairiest mole, mister! (It's not on my face.)

------
We belong to each other now. For better, for worse, like love - only real.

[–] Xcalat3 13 years ago

There is absolutely nothing wrong wit Rachel's face, she's gorgeous.

When there's no more room in hell, The dead will walk the earth...

[–] Moscoso1967 13 years ago

Yeah, you're totally strange. That must be one of the most stupid comments I've ever read! What's wrong with having moles (and most of their moles aren't that big; I guess you never watch anything with Richard Thomas in it)? Just because you haven't got any? Unless you have to remove them for health reasons why should anybody remove them? You're way too superficial!!!