Wal-Mart is good. Read on


I hate how people say wal-mart is bad and such. But they provide merchandise at a cheap price. Now what would be the down side. Rite workers making on the average of 10 bucks an hour, having a good benefits package, and feeling that they belong to something. Then y all these haters come out and say that Wal-Mart is bad. Special Interest groups all the mom and pop shops that went out of business. They hurt the consumer as they want to charge a higher price then Wal-Mart can. So they make a profit. The i hear the argument that these mom and pop shops go out of business, well, if Wal-Mart buys a piece of property is it not allowed to start a sell its products at which ever price they choose. Continuing on most people say that Wal-Mart muscles the producers into selling them cheaper stuff. Wrong, ultimately it is the choice ofthe producer whether to sell to Wal-mart or not. I mean com on if a mom and pop shop buy lets say 50 tvs and Wal-Mart buys 1000000 tvs obliviously the producer will sell cheaper to wal-mart.
Not only that Wal-Mart has no where near the percentage to be a monopoly in its industry. Why? easy competition. You have ur K-marts, Target, ect. If those did not exist you would see WAl-Mart's prices skyrocket since they have monopoly. But why do they keep prices low. So that the consumer wont go to the competition.

Monopolies are not born by themselves they are government created.
Dont tell me *beep* about John D Rockefeller
go to cato.org if you want to see that Rockefeller did not have monopoly.

reply

Do you really think Wal-Mart only wants to drive the Mom and Pop operations out of business? I think Wal-Mart would love to bury Target, K-Mart, Sears, etc. With them gone, who would be around to keep Wal-Mart honest? A virtual monopoly within a market sector would corrupt a choir of archangels, let alone the management team at Wal-Mart! Voluntary self-regulation is a joke, I'm not even sure if the Federal Government would take a stand.

reply

but will target sears kmart sell there companies.
No
competition makes lower prices this y walmart is in business and y they can give its costumer the lowest prices other wise the consumer would to to the competetion.
Y
think about it lets take a look at debeers which virtually own a monopoly on diamonds and treat their workers badly and. This the workers have no where else to go to. They are a goverement subsidy as they get and got money from the goveremt thus making all other competition for debeers.
Then y is it bad that the empolyees of walmart treated good they would stay there but if tjey were treated badly they would go tp the competetion. This is y walmart's prices are low and the empoyees feel good and feel that they can get prompted. While the mom and pop shops dont rly habe amy kinds of promotions as the shop owners are not gonma sell their shops. Also if walmart was a true monopoly they would charge what ever they want but that seems to be opposite in this so situation. Competetion makes lower prices better empoyment it innovates. Should walmart's bepumisjed for helping thepoor feed there families buy clothes. Should tjje small mom and pop shops have a monopoly in a small town so they can charge whatever they want. That rather based ok
price competetion it is based off location competetion which is a monopoly. Should the consumer choose different shops or should they be limited in there consuming to choose based on location and choosing high prices. Also if walmart's was breaking any laws wouldn't the government get involved.

reply

are you drunk or do you really just not know how to write in english?

dont get me wrong im all for shorthand and stuff but this is too far!

reply

do you have a problem with companies using Illegal Immigrants?



__________________________
Stereotypes save time

reply

no as i think of it the federal income tax is an illegal tax imposed by the government and take money by force. Virtually any employer should hire anyone he wants with out any bad side effects.

reply

just as long as your consistent.



__________________________
Stereotypes save time

reply

please jump off a bridge. we all know u work for wallmart

reply

[deleted]

First off EPA fines, they pay them does it matter, they at least have the choice seeing that that business expense is good enough rather than cleaning up. So wat would be the best choice make it so the fines are higher so that Wal-Mart has to change their ways. So it a government run program that should fix themselves. Because if walmart felt that it would be cheaper to create pollution than giving to the EPA they will do that so instead, the company should be forced with increased fines so that they are forced to clean up.

"lawsuits involving employees forced to work off the clock"
ever heard of choice
THE EMPLOYEE HAS THE CHOICE NOT TO WORK.
since the worker wants to work y not let them
it is not like wal-mart is forcing them to work
the workers want more money, and the stupid 40 hours a week law keeps walmart looking bad even though the employee wants to work

"outsourcing everything overseas"
u realize that outsources is spawned by all these worker laws in the US. Minimum wage, benefits, unions. All have a part. So instead wal-mart feels that they should go to another country and not deal with that business of wages , and keeping books and stuff

"forcing companies to cut corners on products - making them unsafe"

Y would companies make inferior products, to sell to there consumers.
There whole existence is because the competition make a better product so they have to make better products. and thus comes safer products.

" slamming down a store right next to competition for the express purpose of driving them out of business - then closing that outlet....."

u realize this happens because of my original post and that also wal-mart closes it so maybe because wal-mart feels it does not make profit.

Y would walmart want to close down shops and then close there own store built rite there. that they spent money one. Makes absolutely no sense.


reply

[deleted]

dude your a socialist i am a capitalist
if u call me names that are not true i will do the same to u

SOCIALISM = FAIL
we now examples USSR, Vietman, Cambodia, Venezula, China
all have poor living conditions.

wat do u want instead of walmart, do u like higher prices and no jobs available for people.

Ur choice

do u want little shops controlling the economy whch only employee a hand full of people and not pay them that well.

u r also forgetting the main part of small businesses they are also businesses

They are out for profit as well

If they could they would be walmart.

This is socialist propaganda, Wlamart high cost of low prices.

and u call me a corporate spokes person.

Also u realize, if walmart did not exist, guess wat these small shops will automatically become wal-mart

y
more profit that is why they r there

think about it

also walmart pays there employees 3 dollars over minimum wages per average worker.

Lets look at mom and pop shops mostly run by well mom and pops, and even if they do have an employee they pay them minimum wage and charge high prices or merchandise


reply

What I want is you to explore an English Grammar book...

Whenever I go to Wal-Mart, not often only when necessity presents itself, I always get the feeling humanity is doomed (watch the movie Idocracy).

Every Wal-Mart I've been to, all the employees have been unhelpful and often unpleasant. Consistently poor attitudes. Oh, and the store is never clean.

reply

Your an idiot.... Those countries you listed were communist.
Sweden= Socialism as do many countries in Europe.
Canada is pretty socialist as well. What's bad about universal health care? In America the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Just look the US's vanishing middle class. You should have government intervention otherwise coperations can just hi-jack the market place. And they dont create jobs in america when the get all there goods from asia. If you have more mom and pop stores then you have more people making a living wage. If you have wal-mart, you have a few people getting the benifits and most of the employees making a small wage. I dont know how anyone could live off a 10$ an hour job.

reply

It depends on where you live as to whether or not you can live off $10. I live in the Dallas/Fort Worth area and there are plenty of people who try to make ends meet on $10 an hour, with children. Now that I'm older, I don't really know anyone who works at a Wal-Mart, and I don't shop there, but I do know that about two years ago they didn't start people off at $10 an hour here. They start between $7 and $8, or $9 if you have extensive experience.

On a side note, the person I did know who worked at Wal-Mart was injured while unloading a truck (he was 63 at the time and asked to unload it by himself after only being there for 2 weeks) and they drew out his worker's comp suit (I say suit but you can't sue over worker's comp in Texas) for two years. This was just long enough for the worker's comp time frame to expire and for the bones in his broken foot to heal wrong so that he is now permanently crippled. He actually wanted to be a greeter, but they didn't have any openings so they put him in electronics, of which he has no experience. That man is my father, so if it sounds like I'm a bit biased on this, you bet I am.

I personally hate Wal-Mart, and I haven't shopped there in some time. I even did the test of buying all the same stuff I usually buy at Kroger the last time I tried shopping at Wal-Mart, and Wal-Mart lost. They weren't cheaper (the total was about $25 higher than Kroger), and their produce and deli selections were of far poorer quality. Their clothes are basically the same price as Target, but Target's clothes last longer and don't look as inexpensive as Wal-Mart's clothes.

All in all, Wal-Mart gets away with a ton of stuff most companies wouldn't get away with, and they bring people in by looking cheap. If it looks cheap, it must be cheaper, right? Wrong. If it looks cheap, that's all it is... cheaper crap for the same price.

reply

They could always not pollute in the first place, you know, act as though they have to answer to the same laws as everyone else. And $10 an hour isn't really a good wage after you work there for almost 8 years. I should know, that is what I made after working the night shift there for that long.


every day may not be good, but there is good in every day

reply

[deleted]

Wow mpstyles is still hittin' the crackpipe I see.
Darn right WalMart has cheap prices, and that's all that idiot materialistic Americans care about.

Arthur
wewerethecoolkids.blogspot.com/

reply

U do realize that human nature is to want wat u want, not wat u need

lets see about that

how many tv,s, computers, beds, rooms, how big is ur house, is ur fridge filled with different kinds of food, or just rice for need, how many cars u have, how much money u have and if u save and get wat u need we would donate it all right wrong.

That is wat human nature is, to want wat u want, not wat u need

reply

[deleted]

So it's human nature to have over 100 Billion dollars and not even donate 1% to charity? You sicken me, sir. How do you look at yourself in the mirror in the morning?

reply

No offense people but he brings up a few good points and I'm sure a lot of you still shop at Wal-Mart. I've seen the movie and found it interesting but did it change my entire life? NO. Is Wal-Mart innocent? NO. Is Wal-Mart the worst company out there? NO. Wal-Mart is the best at what it does, isn’t that what America is all about? Succeeding...Those of you replying to the OP and telling him to die, jump off a bridge, and simply just listing hate are no better than what you claim to despise. There is nothing wrong with questioning, one way or another. I respect his desire to stand for what he believes.

Ps: I still shop at Wal-Mart...and Kmart...and target...and local shops. It’s not the end of the world!

reply

let's take a look at ur charity that create dependecy and no growth for the people now giving to Africa and all that is fine by me as they need our money.
But giving money to homeless people creates a dependency as they get everything for free

U say that having 100billion dollars and giving only 1% to charity I'd anad thing.
Let's see ur logic
giving money to a charity that costs money to go buy food and pay the people who deliver it and pay for gas
let's we about that 100billion dollars
reinvested in a company giving numerous jobs and wealth thus buying stuff for ur business and thus paying for someones salary
That is why our economy works because we reinvest and we don't have to give everything to charity li
in a communist or socialist country the goveremt inyervems cans causes this buying selling and reinvesting money and helping more people than tjat one cj
Charity could ever do tp that extant

reply

Because I worked there and because I have several close friends and/or family members who work for (or have worked for) WM I feel I need to address a few things that you said - particularly because the ones who still do work there (out of sheer necessity) can't say this stuff themselves without risking their jobs.

"I hate how people say wal-mart is bad and such. But they provide merchandise at a cheap price. Now what would be the down side. Rite workers making on the average of 10 bucks an hour, having a good benefits package, and feeling that they belong to something."

To begin with, employees do NOT make an average of ten dollars an hour. Averages are exceptionally deceptive numbers, it's almost magical how you can manipulate an 'average' to make it show what you want it to, here, I'll show you.

1000 cashiers, making the starting cashier salary of 7.50$ hourly, who each work 35 hours a week for a full year, before taxes each make 13,650.00$. Add their annual pre-tax gross and you get 13,650,000.00$. Of course, if you did your division from here you would find that the "average" employee only makes 7.50, and that just doesn't suit their image so....

Add 57 store manager salaries to that, pre-tax, not including any kind of bonuses at a conservative estimate of 100,000.00$ annually, which would be 5,700,000.00$.

So, 5,700,000. + 13,650,000. = 19,350,000.$

Here's where the fun of averaging numbers really comes in. Take that 19,350,000.$ and divide it by 1057 so you get individual pre-tax annual earnings of 18,306.53$.

Take that amount and divide it by 52 weeks of the year for 352.04 weekly. Lastly, since the average, non-salaried employee (the majority of them) works an *average* of 35 hours a week, divide the weekly number by the hours worked:

352.04 / 35 = 10.05$

There you have it, the "average" employee now appears to make 10.05 an hour. Math can be so intriguing sometimes can't it?

But now let's put the wages issue aside for a moment, you also said that the employees get a good benefits package. That's completely untrue of hourly employees. Since they don't make the money people -think- they make the majority of employees can't afford to sign up for a health insurance they won't ever use... why won't they use it? Because the deductible is too high, they know they won't reach the out of pocket cost they have to hit before they get the "good" benefits, so it's a waste of money to even sign up for it. The majority of people who I personally know that have worked there did *not* have health insurance, or any other kind, through WM, some of them do/did have state insurance, or have insurance from a spouse or parent, but *not* through WM - and WM has it set up like that on purpose, because the fewer people who sign up, the less money it has to spend on those benefits.


". The i hear the argument that these mom and pop shops go out of business, well, if Wal-Mart buys a piece of property is it not allowed to start a sell its products at which ever price they choose."

Let's not even bother getting into -how- exactly WM manages to buy some of the property it buys, putting mom & pop stores out of business, because there are plenty of communities that did NOT want WM around that ended up with one anyway...


There you go, my dimes worth (inflation and all that *winks*).

~@~ Victor Hugo: Imagination is intelligence with an erection.

reply

You say that the higher paid managers and retail people make more there for skew the average wage story.

Then would you rather have the Median whihc is the middle number of wages
That number is still 9 dollars an hour
http://www.americanprogress.org/kf/walmart_progressive.pdf
Check it out

You also talk about benefits

That part time and full time employees get benefits that 81% percent of workers are eligible vs the 61% vs other employers
Target does not offer people working less than 20 hours any health benefits WAl-Mart does
Also 48% of wal-marts employees have health insurance vs the 46% from wal-marts competitors

Not only that the same article says that more people are now going to Costco for work as they provide more money and benefits compared to WAl-Mart
There we see a free market tool of competition at work

Guys read Free to Choose and Wealth of Nations to understand how the free market can work on its own

reply

I'm not going to open the .pdf file you're suggesting I should read, more likely than not it's corporate drivel that was manifested to snowball the general and sadly often sheep-like public. I *worked* for WM. The average wage is not ten dollars an hour and the *median* wage is not nine dollars an hour *unless* you count *non-average* employees (salaried managers) amongst your numbers in order to fabricate a number more to your PR managers liking. I worked in a store that employed about four hundred people, we weren't supposed to discuss things like wages, but we did it anyway, and =very= few hourly associates made over nine dollars an hour.

I hate to be the one to burst your bubble but WM does NOT offer benefits to employs that are part-time, if you work under THIRTY-FOUR hours weekly your status is defined as part-time and you are not eligible for benefits, period. Target, on the other hand, *does* offer benefits to employees classified as part-time, now they may have a caveat of being required to work over twenty hours (I don't know, I do not currently nor have I ever been employed there) in order to qualify for those benefits, but at least they have that option available.

You say that forty-eight percent of WM employees have health insurance... does that number include salaried employees (management) or does that *only* look at hourly associates? Does that number exclude the employees who have insurance through a spouse / partner or through the state or another job? WM has a long history of finding ways to pad it's numbers so that it looks better to the general, uncaring public - most corporations do, but then, since you have a PhD in economics from Brown University... you already know that, which means there's no point whatsoever for you to be defending WM (unless of course they're paying you to do so).

~@~ Victor Hugo: Imagination is intelligence with an erection.

reply

Although 9 or 10 an hour is decent for a teenager just trying to make some spending money, it's not even close to livable for a family trying to get by. $10 an hour still puts you under $20,000 a year before taxes. I don't know about where you live, but if you have to pay for a mortgage or rent, utilities, food, clothes, etc.. you're barely gonna make it by, if at all.

reply

That number is still 9 dollars an hour


Even if that were true, you cannot raise a family on those kinds of wages. My girlfriend makes three times that as a nurse, and that would still be low for having a family (we don't at the moment however so it's not really an issue).

$§ Weddings are a lot like children. They are fun when they are not yours.

reply

First off you say I know nothing about economics
I have a PHD in Economics from Brown

You say something about trade deficits
First off you have no clue what a trade deficit is
Trade Deficit is defined as when a trade occurs between countries that one side has more imports and the other country has more exports thus the country with more exports is in a trade defecit

Now lets take a look at you lame explanation of Chinese trade deficit

I will now explain why a trade deficit is not really a bad thing
It shows that people are willing to spend on products from abroad get services from abroad.

How is that bad that means people ahve money and would like to spend it
That shows that the ecnomoy is in a good condition
Lets take a look at what happens in this country
We pay in dollars right for forgeign products and not in yen or any other currency
So the frogein manufactures and sellers look to be paid in the currency in their country
So where will all this currency go that we buy in dollars to pay for stuff.
Back here of course unles these big businesses horde all this money in a huge vault for fun no obvisouly they would'nt they would much rather reinvest moeny back into the United States, thus creating a currency rate. Seing how much money is flowing back into the country thus creating a better ecnomy

You also talk about inflation occuring inflation occurs because we keep making money to cover inflation.
If we keep making money the value goes down simply economics supply and demand
So the way to combat inflation is to slowly bring down the supply of money, and to start making it more market friendly by backing it with gold, and putting less regulation on the market letting banking institutions that have been regualted make money with their own gold in their vaults, this way if a problem in the economy arises then the people can come and take gold out of the bank to keep safe rather than just having pieces of paper that have no backing. This gold standard makes it possible so that the open gold market can determine the price and supply of money rather than just inflating when we need it.

So lets take a look at your inflation argument

Wal-Mart buys American products from the US with Dollars
The people of China buy in yuan thus wal-mart is stuck with yuan wal-mart first will probably start buying with in china for products as china makes most of the products it sells, and also go to the open market to buy the dollars and give in exchange their yuans and thus making the yuans more and thus making them less priced.
Now you will probably retaliate in syaing that we buy more Chinese products in the Unites States today that is where the limited money supply comes in in that less money in actual dollars we give them the better so buy limited the supply thus raising the value of the dollar per dollar makes it so that 1 dollar makes it more valuable than the yuan

You will then say about the Chinese would do the same thing

But the Chinese control their money supply like I said in my explanation before if we privatized it with the gold standard with regulation it would make it so that the market for gold will determine the outcome

Now let me go into the gold standard a bit more

Our country wants gold as we are in a gold standard t(his is all theory for explanation) now we would acquire it through other governments that have it in their deposits, that money does not unnecessarily be shipped but rather can be a number on a computer, thus when we buy a lot of goods from abroad they ask for gold, and countries rarely can be self reliant and also want our goods in return we ask gold from them, but how can we import to china when they export so much simple

Get rid of all the laws that entitle the worker like unemployment social security income tax and other things

This will encourage producers to producer more thus making more to export.

Make it so the the licensing boards are gone so that it is not impossible for someone to make something

Making all this go into effect will make it so that the economy of the US will produce and export and get more gold.

But even if the US did not make enough to keep up does it matter, as our gold reserves go low in our banks the banks will issue less currency instead of inflating the price this will not only end inflation but take care of of deficit as our dollar is worth so much as we have less total quantity in money and making our value sky rocket.
As this happens the dollars that we give forgein investors will not only be high in value they will have to trade it back to the US for a lot of their currency as we have given them a lot of gold in exchange for their products.

Let continue to make this very simple.

Since the financial institution have the gold supply with government institution to protect the citizens from fraud. As these institutions control money their money is almost like a receipt for that much gold. So that when they go to buy something they can pay in gold and is worth in the same amount as the receipt is.

Now lets take this into more theory if the US right now elected that we do this would the Chinese no as they do not have a floating system. Now we have gold from the reserve bank to the financial institutions, we buy Chinese products with our gold backed money. They take the receipt and have to buy the gold from the institution they get the gold and have the gold in their computer systems what do they do then well, they will have to either witch to the gold system, or sell the gold back to us in investments and such

Continuing on if they do switch to the gold system does it matter who exports and imports more as we export we will make it so that it is worth that much gold and as they export it will be that much gold and the currency system is basically gone as gold is the same as currency and no more inflation just trading. Nothing else no trade deficits nothing. This will make it possible so that the American people can finally see that we cannot solve the problem by just going and putting tarries down but instead by going and changing and make it easier to produce and make and then export this will drive the economy into a plus as more people will have work, thus getting more gold as we export more.

Now you no that Wal-mart does not create inflation the GOVERNMENTS do by no backing anything with our money and keep making money for no purpose except to hide our bad value of the dollar.

You have called me a conservative I AM NOT A CONSERVATIVE DO NOT CALL ME THAT

I AM A LIBERTARIAN I believing that government's should make it easier so that people can make a business easier and make things easier and thus export things easier.

reply

mpstyles54, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone who has read your post is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.




"The only place to spit in a rich man's house is in his face."
--Diogenes of Sinope

reply

Walter, you *so* thoroughly rock, I utterly adore you, thank you for that! :D

~@~ Victor Hugo: Imagination is intelligence with an erection.

reply

Y did u steal that from and Adam Sandler film Billy Madison

reply

[deleted]

the current cost of a phd from brown is about $35k per year. a phd would take at least 3 years, so presumably it cost at least $100k for mpstyles54 to learn how to spout barely intelligible drivel about how we need to return to a gold standard.




"The only place to spit in a rich man's house is in his face."
--Diogenes of Sinope

reply

[deleted]

judging by his poor grammar and twisted perspective, i find it hard to believe that styles has a phd in anything other than stupidity. ive never read a more fascist and disgusting method of looking at economy, and i had to take a shower after reading it. i think the biggest problem styles has is the fact that not once did he really step back and put himself in someone else's shoes,
to think about the people who struggle through life working for these big corporations, bust their @$$ everyday and not even get the decent health overage for themselves and their kids like they deserve. i think you were born with a silver spoon in your mouth, and like the previous poster said, its made you weak, both physically and mentally.

reply

Why did your grammar, spelling and capitalization all of a sudden become virtually spotless the moment you claimed to have a PhD? It's as of you had someone else write that one post.

reply

[deleted]

mpstyles i would not spend too much time debating the walmart haters. I have known many of them in real life and they usually fall into a few categories:

The angry poor person or pothead hippy who blames the world cause he only makes 7 dollars an hour. He looks for the biggest and easiest target to blame for his poverty. (i love hippies by the way)

The ex-union employee. He once made 30 dollars an hour making tv sets in tennessee and he got unlimited healthcare and coffee breaks every 2 hours.
He was replaced by someone cheaper and he blames walmart because he can not find another job.

The union bosses. They have traditionally been controlled by the mafia and have legally extorted businesses/consumers with the threats of work stopage.
Yes, many current union bosses in NY make 300,000 a year and do nothing. They are foaming at the mouth thinking how many of hundreds of millions of dollars they could be getting from walmart employees.

The mom and pop store owner. They once had a tiny store with limited hours, a tiny selection and high prices. Their customers found better prices and a better selection. Walmart did not close them down, their customers did.

The competitor. They work and/or own stock in a competing store. Walmart hurts their profits so attacks are expected.

The angry neighbor. Walmart opened a store next to them and they hate the traffic.


Most of the walmart haters i have known are broke miserable people who are looking to blame someone.

reply

You also forgot many of the Wal-Mart employees and former employees (which I am one of) are haters also. I'm also not broke, have a very well paying job, that gives me better benefits then I ever dreamed and at half the cost Wal-Mart ever offered. I work 40hr work weeks and get paid overtime without being harrassed about it. I have set hours which comes to a great convience and also I have an education (shock horror) that throws that last thread you started how people who have kids who work at Wal-Mart should have one or try and get one.

As I repeated before you might want to look into you sources before judging what you know a lack of when it comes to the company and how it treats its employees and the employees in them. Unless you are or have been a Wal-Mart employee then you are just an outside source looking into something with rosecolored glasses and unrealistic information.

And most of the employees hate the place they are working for, but they keep their mouths shuts due to the fact they could be fired for talking negative about Hell I mean Wal-Mart!

http://somewhereinhereyes.blogspot.com/


reply

jdac-1,

You are right on the money. What a great and accurate post. You hit the nail right on the head. You covered every category of the disgruntled losers who despise large companies. There's nothing left to be said on the subject!

reply

[deleted]

Who are you directing that post to mine and the person after me or the OP?

http://somewhereinhereyes.blogspot.com/


reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

LongLiveTheNewMint,

i give your post 5 out of 5 monocles.




"The only place to spit in a rich man's house is in his face."
--Diogenes of Sinope

reply

[deleted]

Kevdurden, re: "Yep - Those disgruntled losers who have absolute control over their families' economic situation, yet choose to remain in underdeveloped and impoverished rural communities because it's just so much fun. Bastards... How dare their parents be poor and uneducated?!" Etc...

*Loves! Swoons!*

That was probably the one of the absolute best posts I've read here. Thank you so much for brightening my day! :)


~@~ Victor Hugo: Imagination is intelligence with an erection.

reply

Jdac-1,
I'm college educated and I'm a professional in the non-retail, non-union field for over 10 years. I'm not a hippie or liberal.

I'm proud to say I haven't shopped at Wal Mart for four years now. In fact when the new Eagles CD came out, which was mostly selling at Wal Mart, I chose to pay more for it through Amazon.com just so I wouldn't have to go to Wal Mart.

Besides treating their employees like crap, I like to avoid trailer trash hangouts which exactly what Wal Mart is. So save your stereotypes.

reply

[deleted]

Of course they are! Didn't you know the government created Ma Bell, but the CEO, Top Execs and shareholders felt the company was getting to big and powerful and thus, in the interest of the poeple of course, decided to regionally breakup the company?!?!

Or is he REALLY being smart and intended his 'goverment created monopolies' to mean local power and cable companies, for example. they are, look it up.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Or from Wally World itself.

Dogs rule - people, not so much!

reply