MovieChat Forums > 9 (2009) Discussion > An important movie

An important movie


What I like with this movie, is that it is a rare exampel on an independent animated feature, that is not trying to be loyal to some family friendly tradition, or is trying to make innocent and/or funny animation for children or all ages. Instead, it tries to tell a story in its own way. There should be more animated projects out there, doing horror or science fiction or whatever, that does not care about a standard formula or ratings.

reply

They tried it in the past and most have flopped. Wizards and the terrible animated Lord of the Rings are great examples of attempts to make animated movies for adults that flopped because they were horrible.

reply

So, because Ralph Bakshi didn't succeed with these two movies about hundred years ago, it means that every new attempt is destined to become a failure?

By the way, another of Bakshi 's animaed movies for adults, Fritz the Cat, did it very well. And Fantastic Planet is amazing.

reply

So, because Ralph Bakshi didn't succeed with these two movies about hundred years ago, it means that every new attempt is destined to become a failure?


No, I'm not saying that - although I can see how you would think I might have been.

What I got from this thread is that this movie is important and a singular event - an animated movie for adults. I was just trying to say it had been done before, many times, and most of them (in my personal opinion) were poor attempts.

Just by the way, I despise Bakshi's style of animation and rotoscope in general - even more than I hate Hanna Barbera's "limited animation" and what it did to cartoons.

reply

I said it was an important movie because it is the latest and most visible example of an animated movie that is not mainstream. Visible as in the public's awareness. It shows people it is actually possible to make an animated feature that is different from the majority, and with a visual quality there is no reason to complain about. (There is also a difference between poor attempts and poor numbers.)

And is it really a feature for adults just because it doesn't follow the standard childrens' movie formula? Judging by their content, there are a lot of old fairy tales as well that could be seen as tales for adults then. I see it more as a film that is meant for everybody who have any interest in it instead of a spesific target audience.

reply

Bakshi's Lord of the Rings was fantastic. It also was not a 'flop' by any proper standard, having a budget of 8 million and grossing 30 million. It just didn't make enough to justify a sequel, probably because it was a cartoon and Tolkien fans were a very definite, small target audience. The real question is why so many people went to see the Jackson version which isn't better. For some reason by the time it came out it was just more acceptable for adults to go to fantasy films.


"I'll book you. I'll book you on something. I'll find something in the book to book you on."

reply

Well... granted some cool animations and non traditional formula, 9 is mostly 'machine chases ragdoll' with a bit of pointless dialog thrown in for good measure. Story and characters are paper thin, 4/10.

reply

A lot of stories can be boiled down to a short sentence. Romeo and Julie for instance; a story about forbidden love when a boy falls in love with a girl.

Besides, it is the movie as a whole that counts, not the single elements. We see a post apocalyptic world in an amazing landscape that as far as I know, has not been shown in animation before.

I'm not saying it was Oscar material, but it was different and fresh, and just as good as many movies from the main animation studios. And none of those silly jokes or funny comments known from these studious.

reply

Couldn't have agreed more.
I think more movies like this one should be made.

reply

Actually 9 is one of my favorite Animation movies out there.

First off, to say that the characters are paper thin indicates not realizing or understanding the full aspect of the movie. Spoilers ahead:

If each and every one of those ragdolls represent a 1/9th of the whole soul of the scientist, how much of a character can there be to each one. They need to be seen an as a whole and as individual reflections of the whole. And even with all that, there is a fair amount of exposition. #1 eventually makes the ultimate sacrifice even though he firmly believes that humanity is not deserving of it.
9 turned out to be a leader who was also willing to sacrifice himself for the better of the world and humanity, when he merely started as an over curious individual.

And thin dialogue? How so, the dialogue is the most important aspect of the film. It's the meat of the movie, special effects, animation and soundmix come second. The story is very much intriguing and it draws you in very quickly. Sure there are certain ambiguity to the concept of the machine, why it needs to suck out souls.. and how releasing souls into the atmosphere gives the planet a second chance at human life... Perhaps a bit abstract, existential and art-house like feature.. but it works..

Job well done on the movie.

reply

Whenever something comes along that is atypical and really cool, it doesn't do that well. I'd love to see more like this but a combination of poor advertising and a moronically inert audience makes that unlikely.


"I'll book you. I'll book you on something. I'll find something in the book to book you on."

reply

Well, the more, the merrier. More variation means more ideas, and it will affect the industry in a good way.

It's true that it usually doesn't end up as block buster successes, but as long as the numbers are not read, it's shouldn't be that important. But the studious wants really big numbers. Luckily, there are individuals like Tim Burton around that can use his influence to make these films possible now and then.

I jsut hope there will come one around soon that makes a huge amount of money, and so open the doors for other filmmakers to do their own animated projects, if only for a while. At least computer animation is getting both better and cheaper with time, so movies like this should become less impossible in the future, even if they still requires a budget on a few millions.

reply

[deleted]

I have heard that the Secret of NIMH did not get the required promotion, and despite all its innivations and return to old quality, it didn't do too well. Had it been a modern Snow White, Bluth's studio would have been able to finance their own movies, and be free to choose whatever story they desired. But they did what they have to do to keep the studio alive, projects that was more of a safe bet and make money. When Spielberg made contact and told him he wanted him to make an animated story about a family of Jewish-Russian mice that migrates to America, Bluth could only say yes.

Just as I would have loved to see what movies Disney would have made had Fantasia and Pinocchio become just as huge successes as Snow White, and the WW2 thing hadn't happened, one must wonder what would have come out from Bluth's studio if they had gotten the chance to do what they wanted to do.

Shane Acker had plans to make one or more sequels to 9, but it looks like it didn't do well enough to make it possible. Where I live, it wasn't even shown at the theatres, but was released straight to DVD.

But if he can join forces with someone, and find other who are willing to invest in another project, then we could expect more in the future. If not, then at least he is one of the main inspirations these days, showing others with a similar background that it is actually possible to make something that's outside the box.

(And a little off topic; 9 seemed to have some elements in common with Theodore Sturgeon's More than Human. If the novel was an influence, or if it's just a coincidence, is hard to say.)

reply

[deleted]

Coming up wiht a new story for a sequel or two should be the easiest part (I even have ideas myself about what the glowing dots set in action, and what's going to happen with rest of the group, even if I have nothing to do with the movie), the biggest challenge would be to be greenlighed and given the required budget. But who knows, with more powerful and cheaper computers, everything is possible.

reply

[deleted]

Not just dark animated films, but more adult animation in general. I wouldn't say that Fantastic Planet is dark, a movie I like by the way, but it is not a film for children. Still, a high-quality horror movie made as animation would have been really interesting.

As mentioned, the software keeps improving, and computer power becomes cheaper and more impressive as time go by. Imagine if you made a movie like Toy Story today. It would have been pretty cheap compared to present animation, where the budget can be as high as 200 million dollars (or as in Tangled, 260 million). 9 had a more modest budget, with only 30 million. If adjusted for inflation, it should still be possible to make these movies for a relatively few million dollars. And that's a start. All you need is one giant success, and we could have something new. Hopefully there are more idealists out there with a lot of talent, and with a foot in the industry, knowing the right producers and such. In the "old days", superhero, fantasy and science fiction were often low budget stuff. And in the 70s, much of the animation was independent stuff, and could compete with Disney (who wasn't exactly on its high back then).

For some reason, stop motion is associated with the darker side of animation these says. It's still pretty innocent and made for children, but it could be a start, and with a CGI movie next (what happened with The Goon by the way?).

Because of Pixar and Toy Story, DreamWorks and Blue Sky and so on, computer animation is seen as something for children. But Pixar only succeeded because they got financial supposert from Disney during the production of their first films. Seeing how succesful they were, other studios followed next. But it could have been a different story. In the 70s, some feares that animation was dead, and the Disney studio almost closed. Again, the independent stuff would have survived, as well as television animation. If Disney had closed, then there would be no Pixar.

But computer games had an independent evolution, and the computer characters become more and more complex. Even in a world without Disney and major animation studios, there would sooner or later be someone who said "let's take this game technology and use it to make a completely computer animated movie". What would have happened then, no one can tell. "Kaena: The Prophecy" was by the way made this way, as you maybe knows, even if that happened years after Toy Story. Perhaps it would be some low budget and independent movies at first, until someone got lucky, and made a box office hit. If this had been a non-children movie, the evolution would have taken a different path.

reply

[deleted]

With no competition, it would probably just be a matter of time before a feature from an indendent studio would hit the jackpot, and probably allowing it to do some bigger projects. But that was then. Today, even if Disney and Pixar disappeared, there would still be Blue Sky and DreamWorks. I don't think anime would have taken over. At least I don't hope so. Some of the stories are good, but I'm not the biggest fan of the most typical anime character design.

If you look at the early Disney features, with movies like Pinocchio where boys are turned into donkeys with no hope of rescue, or the experimental Fantasia, it seems like Disney had ambitions to take animation where it had never been before. But after the war years, he had to play it safe and make movies the whole family could see together. Because of the increasing budgets, further evolution of the medium was no longer possible, and Disney lost much of his interest in animation. If only his films after Snow White had been just as successful, and there would be no strike or war. Maybe he would end up making a movie for an older audience. Disney in its early days is not Disney today, for good and worse.

The reason why most see animation as something for kids, has probably to do with the Saturday morning cartoons. You could call the golden age of animation the golde age of theatrical shorts. Once these more or less disappeared, and only family friendly features like the Disney movies were left as theatrical animation, animation was mostly to be found on television shows for kids. And with the eposides every week, they often had to sacrifice quality, using limited animation. I guess the impression that it's just for kids is something that can be traced back to the television animation made for children.

As you know, in Japan there is so-called hentai animation, but I don't have much interest in pornographic animation. But there is also some stuff made for an older audience. But these don't have much impact to speak of putside the country. Like mentioned, someone should take the risk and make an animated fantasy, science fiction or horror that was not just for kids (not that there are too many horror movie for kids anyway). Stuff that you would need special and visual effects to make anyway. What if DreamWorks decided to do something mature outside their animation canon, and made an animated film of a kind never seen before. Before Harry Potter, many adults would have been embarrased to be seen reading such books. And before Star Wars, science fiction was often seen as something for just nerds. What is required is something that can make people came out of their closet and see something different without being embarrased.

reply

[deleted]

It's a good movie, not flawless, but good.
However, for adults? C'mon, this movie is probably being watched, understood, and enjoyed by a child right now. That doesn't mean there aren't animated movies for adults, though.

reply