MovieChat Forums > Who Loves the Sun (2006) Discussion > This film is *beep* And that's coming fr...

This film is *beep* And that's coming from a crewmember.


This is one of those awful indie pictures motivated only by money, to lure the Garden State/Cameron Crowe fans (I'm with the latter). Except this film doesn't have a single idea of its own. The characters are rampant cliches through predictable scenes of a lost young man (Lukas Haas) returning to the family he deserted after his best friend screwed his girl.

Except everything is so contrived the actors' motivations are all illogical. The filmmakers struggle to create some kind of forced dramatic tension, so hard that the audience laughed during many Serious scenes. Seeing this made me appreciate Elizabethtown. The Silver Jews soundtrack is all that gives the movie credence as a drama.

What pissed me off in the end is the film's message of following your responsibilities, and life's beaten-down paths, regardless of any bumps down the way. Molly Parker's trying to play the enlightened female role, or giggly pixie who has the answers to life and is never attainable (a la Kirsten Dunst in Elizabethtown) except she's not charming at all, actually quite a bitch in not understanding and being angry at her ex (Haas) for leaving her and his family - what's disturbing is the filmmakers rally behind her viewpoint and make it the message of the movie. Which is surely at odds with the cast's supposed liberalism within roles of freethinking artists, writers and a psychologist. But you do see Parker's ass (surprisingly they cut out the topless scene. DVD?).

The actors have little to do, other than standing around being immaculately dressed. Haas plays the brooding silent type, opposite Adam Scott's flamboyant prankster. The film's first hour consists solely of them calling each other out in their summer retreat cabin, Haas against Scott screwing his wife, and Scott for Haas leaving them abruptly.

Trying to sit through it is excruciating. Not to flame, I'm not going to say it's The Worst Film of All Time or something, but sitting through this movie is truly excruciating, as it aspires to such mediocrity.

And sorry, no mention or sound of the Velvet Underground in this pic.

So basically, not only is it a bore, but phony. Instead of being a life-affirming romantic comedy, it's conservative doctrine wound around second-hand plots and characterization.

I enjoyed the crew and shoot, the director and producers were nice, gracious people, not only because it's a rarity for lowly grips or PAs to be invited to premieres. But memories fade, and celluloid remains...

reply

LIghten UP! I am not sure what the "cast's supposed liberalism withing roles of freethinking artists" even means, or how it might be in opposition Ms. Parker's ass. In my opinion this movie was, ass and all, a delight.

reply

You know, I was skeptical of your opinion because I hadn't seen the film. But I just saw it, and you are 100% correct. 1/10

reply

We saw this last night, and I think that you are so far off the mark that you are laughable. This is not supposed to be some angst driven rhetoric about freethinking artists! It is a short slice of life movie about how two young men come to terms with the failings of each other, and their role models (parents). Yes the audience laughed, because it was funny, it is a Canadian film with Canadian humour in it, and therefore funny. It was beautifully filmed, and well acted, and well directed, what more can you ask from an indie film? I know someone else who "worked" on this movie, and he enjoyed every aspect of it including the final result. I recommend it to any one who loves movies that aren't filled with scene changes every 3 seconds just to keep the audience's attention. And to anyone else for that matter. A great slice of life movie.

reply

I guess by "Canadian humour" you mean crappy slapstick? Gee golly, it sure was funny when they were chasing after that snake.

The cinematography was awful. I felt like I was watching a Kodak commercial. Lingering shots of sunsets and birds swimming are pretty cliche, and they didn't add anything to the movie.

Molly Parker played the most cookie-cutter character I've ever seen. She had absolutely no personality. Her job seemed to consist primarily of walking around in bathing suits and lying in pin-up poses. And I'm sorry, but I can't enjoy any movie that tries to use the line "I let him put his **** in me" seriously. What a piece of schlock.

The only two good things about this movie were its short length and the two Silver Jews songs.

reply

The great thing about this film is it's full of slapstick, dry & subtle humor and works without the humor feeling unnatural or forced. While the humor in the snake chasing incident does feature some slapstick humor it comes off feeling natural and realistic. The scene is played for amusement but not to have you laughing in stitches.....if you wanted that go watch the Three Stooges.

Complaining about the cinematography and saying "Lingering shots of sunsets and birds swimming are pretty cliché, and they didn't add anything to the movie." is one of the most ridiculous things i've ever read. That's like complaining about shots of a city being shown in an urban crime drama. Those types of scene always add to the look, feel and atmosphere of the film.

Molly Parker was great playing a more reserved character who was unsure of how to deal with a complex emotional situation. There is nothing unrealistic about the line you hated so much - "I let him put his **** in me"- that is nothing two adults having a heated conversation wouldn't say. Did you seriously not know that?




reply

Why do people have to be so cynical. The film was about dealing with real life situations and the pain that follows. Sorry that there was no explosions or car crashes that most films have. Take it for what it is, a look at life.

reply

bite my weener adolph hitler

reply

[deleted]

This film is an ensemble of unlikeable characters. Not the villainous kind that you "love to hate" but the kind that are so unremarkable and artificial that you simply don't give a *beep* about them. "It aspires to such mediocrity" should have been the tagline.

reply

great description, ty

reply

those parts were supposed to be serious??!!

reply

Might I suggest that you watch (or re-watch) "Kissed" with Molly Parker...or is it too much of a "conservative doctrine" for you. NOW there's a role that Kirsten Dunst would not have touched with a ten-foot pole wearing latex gloves.
Mind you, Parker is not the most "awake" of actresses --let's just be thankful that Gwyneth Paltrow (I left my teeth in West London) or Diazepam-dipped Renée Zellweger did not star in this dramedy...after all it's all it is. You seem to over intellectualize a fairly simple DVD-bound/bait flick that's only filled with good intentions, alas.

Shouldn't being a film "crewmember" be a learning opportunity?

reply

It's odd to me that you site the filmmakers as rallying behind the girlfriend seemingly not understanding why her husband left to begin with and her attitude in reference to that when his friend was the very same way - both of them full well knowing why he left because they'd slept together so you are totally wrong on that point....apparently your memory already has faded and I could care less if you're a grip or a best boy, your views on this film are totally off the mark.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]