This movie was horrible


The first maybe quarter of the movie was funny, then it was just almost unbearable.
The only reason I stayed through the whole movie was because it was at the East Coast premiere, and I didn't want to be rude to Andy Dick.

Oh, and at the questions and answers portion after the screening, all he did was make fun of people in the audience.

So looking back, I should have left.

reply

I was at the premeire too and totally agree with all the above statement. It was a pretty awful movie despite scattered laughs and Dick totally rejected the people who came to support him, despite their positive reaction to the film.

The last line of the credits says "Thanks to the fans who stayed with me through the bad times", or something along those lines...what a way of showing it.

It was a train wreck...totally uncomfortable experience all around.

reply

I was there too. This movie sucked big time! A. Dick is definitely insane.

reply

Well I wasn't at the premiere, but I thought the movie was entertaining.

If you like Andy Dicks works, I believe you'll like this movie.
However if you don't like Andy Dicks works, and you're sensitive, I see how you can loathe this film.
But then again, if you're no fan of his works, and you're sensitive, why the hell do you see this film?

Andy Dicks thing is being a revolting rude sick perverted Dick. It's fun.

If you don't have the stomache for it, or don't appreciate such filth, try looking at the Blockbuster-charts for movies to watch.

reply

I don't need the Blockbuster charts to find a good film. I really hope you're not implying that only refined moviegoers can understand Andy Dick on some separate plane of intellect that the masses can't grasp.

The movie sucks -- period. It has nothing to do with being offensive, which it isn't. Random crap for crap's sake isn't offensive, it's boring. And that's all this film has. Frankly, I'd take the Blockbuster charts over this any day, and I don't place too much faith in the BB charts.

Andy Dick doesn't have imagination; he has friends in high places. And that's how he got this garbage made. If you like it, fine, but don't insult people who don't. It just makes you look silly.

reply

A lot of people do that nowadays. If you diss an "indie" film or an "edgy" TV show, they end up calling you a Blockbuster person who watches Two and a Half Men or Friends. It doesn't seem to occur to them that just because something is outside the mainstream doesn't automatically make it great.

I've seen this film, and it's *beep* awful. Just because it's "indepedent" doesn't mean anything. It's garbage, regardless of its budget or the methods employed in making it.

reply

"I really hope you're not implying that only refined moviegoers can understand Andy Dick on some separate plane of intellect that the masses can't grasp." I honestly think only some moviegoers can understand this movie on some separate plane of experience/intellect/taste that many of the masses can't grasp. I honestly think that judging from how clever and deep it is and its low imdb score. This movie is similar to a Christopher Guest movie, but on a very dark topic.

If "The movie sucks -- period" is really all you take away from Michael Hitchcock's improvs in it, Bob Odenkirk's improvs in it, Mo Collins' improvs in it, Danny Roane among his crew with a scrawled "soda" taped onto a hard liquor bottle as satire of the ultimate enabled alcoholic in denial, yes, you are one of the masses who can't grasp some things, and good luck with that.

reply

Coming from a member with the name xpoopx I can't really take your post seriously. Troll on.

reply