MovieChat Forums > Dan Aykroyd Unplugged on UFOs (2005) Discussion > Anyone seen this Dvd? Evidence: The Case...

Anyone seen this Dvd? Evidence: The Case for NASA UFOs


I'm thinking of buying this and was wondering if anyone has an opinion on whether it's worth it.

-------------------
"I've never seen a sight, that didn't look better lookin' back".

reply

It's been uploaded for free; I think it's in the public domian:

http://www.moviesfoundonline.com/dan_aykroyd_unplugged_on_ufos.php

reply

It's junk. 3 hours of gibberish from what appears to be a rather dimwitted man.

An observant individual may recognize, immediately, that this is suggested by the very title itself. However to know for sure one would have to watch it, as I have.

It opens with an introduction by Dan Aykroyd, which is humorous without appearing to intend to be; as Mr Aykroyds humor often is. This follows with a lengthy series of segments exploring phenomena suspected of being alien related, guided by David Sereda. Sereda evidently has a severely limited understanding of physics, logical reasoning, scientific study/theory, the english language, film making, editing, script writing, et cetera.

He is also observably a avid practitioner of pseudoscience. He poses theories while claiming to have evidence, then tries to prove those theories with inaccurate statements or easily disprovable theory... theories supported by theories that rely heavily on so called facts that clearly are not.

In other words, gibberish.

I could in fact go further into detail as to how flawed his entire presentation is. I could likely provide actual evidence to disprove everything presented. And all despite the fact that I myself didn't even graduate high school. This really leaves me questioning Sereda's level of intellect; or who, in there right minds, would listen to his gibberish for more than a few minutes... unless to ascertain how ridiculous Sereda's theories were, or with the hope that there may be some jewel buried somewhere in all that trash. Those who fall into the later category, should expect to be left disappointed.

reply