MovieChat Forums > August (2009) Discussion > New Vesus Old Money

New Vesus Old Money


The pivotal moment for the entire movie apart from Tom's speech at the electronic convention was his brief negotiations with those purchasing Landshark at the end. His "matter of fact" statements to his brother in the middle of the film, regarding his behavior fueling the fire for promoting investment and stock stability, came off as a confession after this meeting. David Bowie's character was to be the embodiment of established wealth surviving multiple generations. His disgust perhaps came at the awareness he had for the techniques the Tom's had to imploy to maintain their new-age wealth. A classy snob that could not have been pulled off better than with David Bowie's articulate and savvy persona.

It occurred to me that in fact the movie portrays Josh's character Tom as the bad guy in and of it's entire. Unfortunately, the "rockstars" of the start-ups were nothing of the such. They fed into the model of wall steet to garner stock appeal. Instead of allocating funds for advertisement they purchased and ated to their hearts fancy as posters themselves. Hardly villians. This movie could have done a lot more with itself.

reply

Fact is the nouveau riche soon become the nouveau poor ...while the old money stays around much much longer... Funny! wisdom seems to come about the same way

Don' like wat U see! Don' like wat U heard! Don' like wat happen!
Go elsewhere or Turn movie off

reply

I've been thinking on and off about this movie, and what really bothers me is Ogilvie's holier-than-thou attitude toward Harnett's character. For one, the financial industry is institutionally corrupt as a way of doing business (has been since there was a financial industry. My great-grandfather went to prison before the crash because it was his turn to take the fall when his firm got caught doing business as usual.)

And for another, if he's so savvy, how does he not recognize the central fact about the fictional company Landshark, which was typical for having a brilliant (tho unnamed) concept that wasn't possible to realize (either technologically, infracstructure-, or landscape-wise.) And that harnett's character, like all of those young turks in the boom, were just doing what they could with what they had. He believes in his brother's idea, knows it can happen, just not now. And to have any shot at ever, just maybe, making it happen, he has to keep tap dancing and hand waving.

I love David Bowie, but his character comes off as clueless and past it, for all his money and influence, for not seeing what Hartnett's is trying to do, and not seeing that it's noble, if doomed.

It would've been a better scene if instead of him being the crusty I Don't Like the Cut of Your Jib, Sonny. Eh? guy, they'd given him the whole see-your-young-self thing, with a bit of empathy. As it is, that scene sticks in my craw. And snobs are never truly classy.

reply