Horrible


I saw this film at the Cannes market. They were not allowing any press people inside (press people are allowed to come see some of the market screenings, so they can do write ups about the film, most people want them too, it helps visibility with the film), instead, they wanted the opposite... this was already a bad sign.

In this film, every character is talking down to every other character, it was almost insulting. And through the dialogue, I felt as though they were even talking down to the audience, whomever would be watching it. I don't know how to explain it. I would say "watch the film to see for yourself," but if this film gets distribution, I'd urge you not to watch it. It is a huge waste of time. A too blatant, that it almost becomes a nonsensical mess. It's like the script had a virus on it and I just want to Norton the word program to undo the mess!

In the beginning of the film, Sarah Jessica Parker, who is the Dean of Student Life, is talking to this guy to tell him he needs to change his nationality from New Rican to Puerto Rican so he could get his scholarship. The kid is pissed "why should I have to change my nationality to Puerto Rican, if I haven't even been there, I'm New Rican!" (meaning, a Puerto Rican born in New York). The kid had no valid point, because if he has already established he's from Puerto Rican descent then he should understand why his nationality is Puerto Rican. Afterall, being from New York isn't a "nationality," it's a city. I myself am a New Yorker, and if my family were from Sri Lanka, I would never want to call myself a "New Lankan," that isn't a nationality, South Asian is. Secondly, SJP's character already told the student that he was going to get a scholarship because he was smart & because of his paper. That in itself already should have showed him that his scholarship was about his abilities as an individual. But then, he goes off as if, his intelligence and paper doesn't matter anymore because he can't put "New Rican" as his nationality. My first assumption based on this opening, was this film would be about SJP's character dealing with bratty kids like this. But in the next scene, a racial hate crime occurs on the campus to a different individual and SUDDENLY, the film sides with this kid who wants to declare New Rican as a nationality and it's about how SJP was wrong to let him get away with calling himself a "Puerto Rican" and not "New Rican." The writers really should have rethought their opening and rewrote it in a way so they wouldn't be so hypocritical. Because SJP's character seemed as though she cared about individuals... Individualism is one of many keys to dissolving racial issues, because it's a change of mindset where you start looking at people for who they are and not letting their looks define who they are. Parker's character becomes a woman who cares about each of her students (ethnic or not) into a woman who wanted to teach in the Vermont college because it was predominantly white (ironically, the entire school seems to have more minorities than what Parker claims, when she says "I came here because it was all white." This too comes out of nowhere. Based on the casting, I was thinking "really? It is all white?" It is as if the writers decided "page 70 will be a great page for the Dean, who up to this point, seems to care about her students and how they feel about the racist acts going on campus, to a woman who really decided to move to Vermont because she wanted to segregate herself with the white people." If the writers wanted to preach something, they obviously didn't go to seminary school.

Later, this issue becomes this inyourface, everyone who deals with racism is right, even if they create their own racism and the people who aren't faced with it are wrong. Almost saying, if you are a minority, you are right. And all the caucasians are racist. I was hoping to be proven wrong the entire movie, that the movie was more than this. But the resolved in the ending was basically trying to say that all caucasians are racist, even if they don't say anything racist or conduct anything racist, because they are all thinking it. This puts things into people's mouths. . . or should I say "minds." But all the minds, amongst the faculty in the film, suddenly agree to this kind of thinking.

Parker's character befriends a reporter who she recognizes from his past news segments in Chicago. They start hanging out and talking and go to a bar and dance, etc. They seem as though they are very attracted to one another. But then one day, the reporter comes into her office and asks her to go to a forum or dinner, I forget, and Parker's character says "No, I can't, can't you see I'm busy." (in fact, she was busy, she was stressed out writing something for the school). BUT all of a sudden, randomly, the reporter goes "Just say it, it's because I'm black." And you are expecting Parker's character to be like "Where the hell is this coming from? I'm obviously attracted to you. But I'm really busy." But instead, Parker basically admits it has something to do with that. It was almost ridiculous. If that really was true then the writers should have built her character up to that point to come off like that. Not write her character as someone who was attracted to the reporter and then suddenly not because of his race.

But the movie continues on with random outbursts like these. People pointing fingers. It is so ridiculous. I don't understand how Sarah Jessica Parker, agreed to do a movie like this, being a woman from NYC. On the other hand I also feel as though she was miscast, because she basically sounded like and had the same mannerisms as Carrie Bradshaw, but with dyed brown hair. But to be honest, maybe no one should have been cast in this role, because the movie shouldn't have been made. Not with this script and certainly not with this mindset. Mindset, meaning, generalizing race and generalizing everyone and what they think and generalizing people's thoughts.

I was a little offended by the film, because I AM a minority and I felt the film was racist in itself. Obviously, I know the film probably initially intend to be quite the opposite from being racist, to give a social awareness, but the final product was exactly what I have said. The film tried too hard to segregate people and their interests that it all became a blender of fluff and mess. The "twist" in the end, was something you already knew was going to happen, based on the writing of the film. And the "twist" was supposed to parallel Parker's life, that was so blatantly cheesy and stupid.

The film starring Sarah Jessica Parker, became a film starring, "are you sure it's Sarah Jessica Parker? Maybe it's a lookalike. Because I doubt she'd do a movie like this."

Notes from the rest of the cast... Miranda Richardson probably was the best performer out of all. But I still think what a waste of talent to do a poorly done movie like this.

reply

ohmigosh, it is this bad? i was oh so looking forward to this film but after reading your review, i am losing interest. maybe it is better off that its not pick up for distribution.

reply

vedrai - I really appreciate the value of your impression of the film, being that you are "a minority" (which is a term I personally don't like using). I'm white, and worked on this film, and really didn't see things at all like you mentioned in your writeup, which is not to say you're "wrong" on your impression, just that it's interesting to see how someone of a different ethnic background than I sees this.

I would like to encourage everyone, regardless of ethnicity or age or cultural background to take the time to see the film (should it be released) and make their own conclusions though. I still believe that this movie is meant to make the viewer think by bringing racial issues to the forefront with various viewpoints and to subtly interact with the thoughts and morals of each individual viewer.

To be honest - my opinion is that this movie just might actually be not edgy ENOUGH for it's time. In a world of Michael Moore films and Supersized movies, subtlety is grossly underappreciated. People might walk into this film expecting "in your face" controversy and when they don't get it, they're left to wonder, "Okay, and the point of that was...?"

Again, this isn't to berate your opinion in any way, vedrai. Please understand that my point is simply that I think this movie will have a larger impact based on individual reactions (including yours!) as opposed to standard film critic type reviews.

reply

you have good points in your post vedrai!!!

reply

It's "Nuyorican" NOT New Rican. This is a term that has been around for quite some time and is a common way that Puerto Ricans from New York identify themselves.

reply

Thanks, i was going to comment on this.

reply

I know I am replying/commenting on posts that are over a year old at this point, but I happened to find this thread and just had to say something.

There is a difference between ETHNICITY and NATIONALITY. I am born and raised in Manhattan and my NATIONALITY is American. My parents are Italian and English and I consider those to be my ETHNICITIES.

I have not seen this film or the play, however, people on this thread appear to be confusing ethnicity and nationality. That character's nationality is American (North American to be exact). His ethnicity is Hispanic/Puerto Rican. If he chooses to identify as Nuyorican or any other mash-up of terms so be it--but that doesn't make said term either an ethnicity or nationality.

reply

Hello:

First off I am really surprised at verdrai's views! I played Ross in the stage production, which I am surprised they cut that role on this film; anyway racism is a HUGE issue in America and the underlying messages in this film could help change the climate.

I have never seen the movie but one HUGE diffrence from the film and the play is that they play created a sense of racism that the movie can't. I think the screenwritters/producers who adapted the script did a huge wrong by adding characters who are African-American to the cast. I know that sounds odd, but the message of racism was much stronger when it was a bunch of White-Privledge folks "talking" about the descriminatory events within the film.

And bottom line, EVERYONE has racists feelings, weather or not they cause discrimination is a completely diffrent issue, and I believe that is one of the key points in the play.

reply

I couldn't agree with you more. Leave it to Hollywood to screw up this great play by trying to make another "Crash" or something.

reply

They really did, but my issues with Crash are much larger then this!

reply

damn this is a long ass rant my friend. You should check out the play its based on that way it will lead you to what the writer wanted to do with it. The fact that You think Sarah Jessica is above this movie is insulting to her because she obviously chose this as an issue that she wants to bring attention to. The fact that you are not down with the title Nuyorican or that youre from Sri Lanka and NYC doesnt make the thousands of people who claim to be as such insignificant. People that walk away from the movie on the defensive are afraid to question their subconscious no one has time for people who are upset about experiencing white guilt theres some serious racism going down these days and if you dont believe her character could hold down some deep hatred based on race then you didnt hear about Michael Richards exploding out of nowhere and illustrating perfectly what this movie is trying to get at. We're all capable of racism, i'm latino if that gets me special magic points and i have racist shi t come out of my mouth all the time. this play is about deep racism in our subconscious and its time we realize that just cause schools arent segregated anymore that the *beep* doesnt happen anymore behind closed doors

reply

Who cares about SJP or whether or not someone knows how to spell Nuyorican. Just from the plot description, it sounds like they butchered a wonderful play. Sounds like they cut Ross and turned him into a black reporter, which, thematically, seems like a really really bad idea to me. This makes me sad because I am big fan of Rebecca Gillman's work. Skip this and just read the play instead. Then read her play "The Glory of Living". Someone should do a (good) film adaptation of that one.

reply

It seems like you are very passionate about how this movie came across to you. However, the movie still looks interesting to me. I’ll probably try to catch it anyway and judge whether or not the film is horrible on my own.

The kid had no valid point, because if he has already established he's from Puerto Rican descent then he should understand why his nationality is Puerto Rican.


But if he were born in America, wouldn’t his nationality be American?

I haven’t seen the movie, but I think that might’ve been his point. I can understand wanting to identify a specific ethnicity on an application, but he probably hasn’t ever set foot in Puerto Rico. He was born in New York, but he’s suppose to say he’s from Puerto Rico even if his family came over here 25 or 50 years ago?


When the hurly-burly's done. When the battle's lost and won.

reply

The movie must be completely different from the play if it's like this.

reply

Not disagreeing with above post, but just to clarify: SJP is from Cincinnati, not NYC. (And I'm not implying that she's somehow channeling Cincinnati's whacked racial politics, or that Cincinnati's racial politics are really any more whacked than any place else's. But SJP is a graduate of Cincinnati's SCPA, grew up there, and still claims it as her hometown.)

reply

This film's script, dialogue, and characters were all bad. Just a bad movie altogether.

reply

Was looking forward to the movie but couldn't stand to watch it til the end. Real bad movie.

reply

Yeah its pretty bad.

reply