MovieChat Forums > Bloody Mary Discussion > boobs for the sake of boobs (spoilers)

boobs for the sake of boobs (spoilers)


Really annoys me. THERE IS NO NEED FOR IT! Unless you are trying to attract a group of 13 yr old boys, I mean come on! Why did they show her boobs while she was in the shower? Related to nothing! And why do they make the girl go down the hole naked in the beginning? What is the deal? Why not throw in gratuitous penis's also? I'll never understand this double standard, either way, the nudity was RIDICULOUS!

reply

OH YES THERE IS POSITIVELY NEED FOR IT!

If a movie intends to entertain its audience with life-deprecating displays of violence and death he must occasionally counterpoint this with life-affirming images like ... e.g. nekkid boobies. There should be a law to enforce that!

And if you enjoy watching life-deprecating things like death and torture but the view of life-affirming things like boobies scare you - go see a therapist. Because a normal mentally sane person would react exactly the other way around.

reply

I never said I was "Scared" of boobs, I have a pair myself, believe me, I'm not scared. Nor do I mind there being nudity in a film, but only when it is RELEVANT. The nudity in this was ridiculous. No need for it at all. Even if they put in a ridiculous sex scene or something, at least then there'd be an explanation for the boob show, but there was nothing! They show a girl topless in the shower, and the scene didn't relate to ANYTHING! Why not just show people taking a dump? It's the same thing.

reply

Wouldn't a girl typically be topless (as well as bottomless) in a shower? WTF are you talking about? People taking a dump is the same thing?!? WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?!?

I notice you didn't object to seeing the dude's ass shown while he was painting a picture... Being nude while painting is more "relevant" than being nude in the shower?

reply

I'm saying the shower scene was COMPLETELY pointless, had no reason to be there, had nothing to do with ANY scenes. And I didn't mention the guys ass because after the shower scene I turned it off, it was a waste of my time and a joke.

reply

Noone objected to the dudes ass because it was Cory Monteith, sex machine. Duh.

But yeah, pointless boobs were pointless and awesome. Mmhm.

"Trophies are like herpes. Know why? Sue Sylvester has hourly flareups of contagious talent."

reply

The repeated, gratuitous boobs throughout this movie were about the only things keeping me watching by about the halfway point... this flick was pretty lame.

Your Favorite Band Sucks.

reply

and I'm going to fast forward now to Cory's ass. I say more male nudity in horror. Equality for both sexes, please!

reply

Bravo to that, imaginary-life! Kudos to the filmmakers for throwing in a gratuitously naked male ass - but there should have been more!

reply

Those bare boobs added immensely to the overall entertainment value of this film.

I'm a totally bitchin' bio writer from Mars!

reply

Titties?

reply

What's GOIN' on?

reply

The hot women getting their boobs out was the only good thing about this movie.

"Don't *beep* with the original"

reply