MovieChat Forums > Broken (2006) Discussion > IS IT A DREAM OR A PLACE?

IS IT A DREAM OR A PLACE?


THE YELLOW BRICK ROAD OF BROKEN DREAMS
Is Broken a Dream, or a Place?

Broken is Dorothy’s trip retold, with LA as Oz, as seen from Mulholland Drive. From the clean shining sealight of Zuma Beach, to the superficial artificial light of Skid Row dives and midnight diners, Broken follows the arc of a young woman from the Midwest who follows her dreams to Los Angeles, and almost lets her nightmares do her in.

Heather Graham is Hope, a young woman who doesn’t think that Cleveland rocks, and goes west with her guitar in hand and a song in her heart called Hanging Tree. The sealight of California lights Hope up brown and golden, she looks beautiful and happy lying on the beach at Zuma, when she is approached by a stranger (Jeremy Sisto) who approaches her as if he walked out of the glare of a setting sun,. He asks for a cigarette, but Hope doesn’t have any, she has quit, so he pulls two from his pocket and offers her one. The guy says his name is Will, and this gesture of his is more than a pickup tactic, it is a clue as to who Will really is, a clue that only makes sense at the end of the movie.

The yellow brick road that millions have followed to Los Angeles is lined with permanent detours and dead ends, and Will takes Hope by the hand and leads her away from the golden, dreamy light at the beach and down one of those bad paths, the path of heroin addiction which plunges Hope into a world of bad light, artificial light, the light of tunnels leading to hell, of dingy apartments with the light blocked by foil, to the light of a butane lighter, bubbling heroin in a spoon. The heroin that is slowly taking the light out of Hopes eyes and out of her dreams.

Broken moves backward and forward and sideways through time, but the real time of the movie takes place after midnight in a café where Hope scratches out a living as a waitress. This is the Blue Star Café in the movie, but those who know Los Angeles will recognize it as the Hellay Café, because the patrons that Hope waits on are everyone you don’t want to become in Los Angeles: Jake Busey and Joe Hursley are sadly funny as two heroin-addicted losers who can’t score smack or women at 2:00 in the morning. Jessica Stroup is beautifully sad as an Xd out Valley chick stuck behind two guys she doesn’t like, and looking for salvation from Hope. Linda Hamilton is evil sad as a madame who plays on Hopes weaknesses and tries to lure her even deeper with promises of big money. Hope has already prostituted herself physically and mentally, for drugs, for Will.

Tess Harper is just sad as a homeless woman who seems to be able to read Hope’s mind – and a reflection of what Hope will soon become if she continues with Will.

The other patrons are a wannabe producer and director – younger and older versions of the endless train of BSing hopefuls that pass through Los Angeles. There is a wannabe record producer luring three wannabe rock stars with promises of meeting “the most powerful man in Hollywood” at two in the morning.

The Blue Star Café could also be called the Wannabe Café, as it is a purgatory between the heaven of all that Los Angeles promises and the hell of broken dreams. Hope is trapped in this purgatory, at two in the morning. She is flashing back on her relationship with Will, a relationship that is more sex and drugs than rock and roll, a relationship that is stealing Hope’s youth and beauty, and her dreams and self respect.

Hope is done with the relationship, but not Will. The homeless woman warns Hope that Will will be back, he will always come back. As Hope waits on the various sad cases in the Hellay Café, the clock is ticking as Will pulls his gun and steals cars and makes his way to confront the woman who has spurned him.

There is a weird tension in the Wannabe Café when Will busts in with a gun, threatening everyone. A lot of these people need killing – they would be better off dead – but Will ends up shooting the saddest and most innocent of them all. Jeremy Sisto plays a believable psycho, a common type around LA: the guy who can’t make it, and takes it out on everyone around him.

Hope takes all of Will’s wrath on herself, and faces her moment of truth, making a decision and with a loud bang forces the viewers to make up their minds about Broken: Is Will an addict, or is he Addiction? Is he a person, or a symbol? Did all of this happen, or was it all a heroin nightmare that took place as Hope nodded on a bathroom floor.

Is this whole movie reality, or is it, in the words of Dorothy: A dream, or a place?

reply

[deleted]

I say 2 thumbs up. What better way to symbolize/personify a heroin addiction. The play on Hope and Will is great. The old wreck at the diner who says "he'll be back, Will always comes back" is what gave it away for me.

reply

I agree, I think Will is a personification of Hope's heroin addiction, based on what Tess Harper's character said about him coming back, and the fact that he pimped her out to a drug dealer to score.

reply

well done!

reply

I believe the movie is structured so that you're supposed to assume that the events taking place at the diner are real, but later you're supposed to realize its a dream or an internal struggle. The fact that all of Hope's desires and weaknesses are all personified on the same night in the same diner is way too much of a coincidence to be a normal night of work. Not to mention that while she's confronting Will before he holds up the place, she sees herself as all her various customers she's served that night.

I think it's somewhat obvious who in the diner is real and who is a metaphor for Hope's various desires and weaknesses. The only one who is questionable is Will. Was he really her ex-boyfriend, or was he an avatar of Hope's heroin addiction, or was he both?

reply

This movie sucked ass. You knew from the first five minutes that the whole movie was going to be a dream - once you saw her asleep in the backseat and then the movie started. And then as soon as you found out the basic story of each group of diners you knew that they were parts of herself. It's kind of like surprise ending cinema for dummies. I kept waiting for something to happen that was unpredictable and it never did. This director has apparently never been in show business before directing this movie and the writers are TV show writers. They obviously had an int4resting idea but not the skills to pull it off.

reply

If you think this movie sucked, you didn't get the deeper meaning.
I thought it was weird in the beginning, too. But then I started to realize that there is a deeper meaning to the entire film.
The whole thing is an allegory. All the characters are symbols and they all play roles to point to a theme that whoever wrote this is trying to tell the viewers.
There are a lot of possible themes the movie could have. No doubt in my mind that each table in the diner represents a path that Hope could possibly go down in the future.
I need to analyze more to try and determine some of the themes, but I'm sure this movie is not just a movie. If you've ever read "The Old Man and the Sea" by Ernest Hemingway or "The Scarlet Letter" by Nathaniel Hawthorne and analyzed those books, you should be able to analyze this movie. In those books, the characters are not meant to be individual people - they're meant to be symbols in a bigger meaning.
Why is Hope named Hope? Could she symbolize hope?
Why is Will named Will? Could he symbolize will?
They are universal symbols that have been woven into a story by the writer in order for him to make some kind of statement.

reply

dylan, when I thought about your question "Why is Will named Will?" and what the name could symbolize, the first thing that came to my mind was philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche and his "Will to Power". Nietzsche writes, "Even the body within which individuals treat each other as equals . . . will have to be an incarnate will to power, it will strive to grow, spread, seize, become predominant—not from any morality or immorality but because it is living and because life simply is will to power." It's based on the Schopenhauer's idea of everything having a "will to live", but goes even further. Everything not only has a will to live, but a will to grow infinitely, dominate & control. If you believe that the character "Will" only exists as a personification of Hope's heroin addiction (Tess Harper's remark about him coming back hints at this), and that her getting her life together threatens Will's (the addiction's) existence. Then Will's behavior makes sense as he is fighting to continue to exist, to spread, to become bigger, to control Hope. He has a "will to power". Anyhow, it may be out of left field, but that's my theory about the name "Will".

reply

After finishing watching and figuring it out, I felt that the events in the diner were all the different parts of Hope, what she could be, wanted to be, might be. Not structured as a dream so much, but as a tableau for the movie-watcher.

I thought this makes sense, as I was wondering why a well-to-do woman like the Linda Hamilton character, a madam with plenty of money, would be at a rundown diner. She wasn't really there but just represented someone who could use something Hope could give.

reply

I agree with this idea more than the allegory. Hope is not only looking at who she wants to be but all of the ideas she's played with being. The madam represents her past indescretion with the drug dealer (which I believe actually occured)and the others are more obvious. Even if it was allegory it wasn't that amazing of a film because this dream/reality/near-death genre is popping up everywhere.

***Spoilers***

Stay is the same basic principle with a bit more urgency. The I Inside which is from I believe 2002 is also the same principle. Therefore this movie is not as innovative as this review makes it out to be.

***end spoilers***

I do believe this film achieves its end better than the other two but I was hoping for something a bit more straight-forward with this film. I believe it would've even been better if they simply hadn't shown all the falling asleep in the beginning because if you've ever seen this type of film before it does give it away.

reply

You seem to have a better handle on this than anybody- who was Hope? She seemed to be the waitress, but at the end Tess Harper was seem in the same shirt Hope had been wearing all through the movie.

reply



This was an awesome film... and that is an awesome review!

I caught the homeless woman as an older hope right away and thought, perhaps, there would be some of that good old time travel where her older self travels back in time to try to change her life path.

But the entire diner as a metaphor was a great device. All the women there were hope. The homeless girl, the party girl on exstacy, the singer with a bright future... this was great.

A good flick for screenwriting classes!



Dwacon
http://dwacon.blogspot.com/

reply


This was a good summary. I don't think a lot of people 'get' the movie..
Hope was never even a waitress in that Diner. I do think she was a patron because at the end, when she comes in to get the drugs & goes in the bathroom, the people working there seem to know her.
I believe that the whole diner sequence where each person comes in, was not reality, neither was Will, or any scenes with him in it. I think all of it took place in Hope's dream, while she was passed out in the back of the car. Will represented her addiction, he wasn't a real person. I too wondered why he chose to shoot the poor homeless woman at the Diner, the most innocent one there. I think it is because that woman represents what Hope will become and it shows that "Will" will eventually kill her if she doesn't kill him, (her drug addiction), which she ultimately does when she shoots him in the bathroom. Then, she wakes up and is on the beach with the cook from the Diner, the one who drove her out of there..

reply