MovieChat Forums > The Dark Knight (2008) Discussion > Better Batman Film: Batman (1989) OR The...

Better Batman Film: Batman (1989) OR The Dark Knight (2008)?


For me, Batman (1989) wins and it's not even a competition.

Batman (1989) has the better Batman, the better Joker, the better Batmobile and the better musical score. I also love the noir atmosphere, the Anton Furst set designs, and the German expressionist influence of the movie.

20 years from now, Batman (1989) will still be remembered as an important piece in cinema history and The Dark Knight (2008) will have already long faded into obscurity by that point.

reply

I like Batman 89 more though I also do like the Dark Knight. But I grew up in the 90s so my opinion is biased.

reply

They were both great films with great actors, writing, and directing, however, the highlight of both of these films was "The Joker". Nicholson and Ledger were outstanding stars that made both of these films memorable and perhaps it is the reason to such success for Joakin's Joker which did not require a batman to make it shine just as bright.

reply

Clearly, it is The Dark Knight with its edgy plot, direction, acting, and so on. Just look at the awards it has won. That's not to say Batman (1989) wasn't any good, but it didn't have enough in the overall scheme of things.

reply

I prefer Batman '89. Keaton nails the part and makes it his own. He is, in my opinion, still undefeated as Batman.

Still, it's hard to argue with Ledger's Joker or the cool dynamics that Nolan plays around with regarding duality. Batman and Joker as antitheses to each other, but also Harvey Dent as a white knight to Batman dark knight and then as a literal two-face. There's a lot going for TDK, and I do disagree that it will fade into obscurity. I think both will be remembered for their individual genius.

reply