MovieChat Forums > I Could Never Be Your Woman (2007) Discussion > They really differ 10 years!

They really differ 10 years!

posted 15 years ago by LarissaXX
3 replies | jump to latest

I knew Michelle was pushing 50 and how awesome to be playing a 40-year-old at that age.
I was convinced she had work done (Nicole Kidman and Meg Ryan did and they've ruined their face) but when I watch the film I noticed she apparently didn't. I am 41 and have no wrinkles yet. Michelle has some (but is almost 50!) and pulls off a more gorgeous 40-year-old than I'd ever be!

I didn't know Paul Rudd yet (I am not from US) but it was funny when I looked up his age and I saw he was 40 (playing a 29-year-old). Is he always this funny in films? How come he is not so well-known?

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] LarissaXX 15 years ago

My mistake. Because he isn't famous over here doesn't mean he is not famous in US. I looked it up but most of his films were not in the cinema in Europe except for I could never be your woman, Over her dead body, Knocked up and Forgetting Sarah Marshall. So that is only since 2007.

I am gonna watch Forgetting Sarah Marshall tonight on TV. I understand he has a supporting role in it.

[–] HarlowMGM 15 years ago

The secretary says Michelle's character is 45 but she may have just been being a bitch but I wonder if Michelle's character was honest about being 40 after all she had given earlier ages twice before. Rudd was good but he was really too old for his part as the "younger man", I mean he not only has to be late 20ish but he plays a teenager on a tv show which Paul could not have actually pulled off.