MovieChat Forums > Almost Normal (2005) Discussion > One question about the ending...

One question about the ending...


OK, when Brad gets back to the present, and Julie takes him home, he turns the TV on and sees the news broadcast with the religious fanatic and Dwayne Twillis debating. Now, at the beginning of the movie, when he and Julie were going through the yearbook, Brad mentions that Dwayne had died from AIDS during the 80's. So, how is it that he's in the debate?

Is the debate just a hallucination he's having (for that matter is the whole movie just a "fever dream" as it were)? Or has Dwayne somehow escaped his unfortunate fate?

I know in the deleted scenes section on the DVD, there's the bit in the scene where he gives his big speech at the Blue Jean Ball, where he warns Dwayne to always wear a condom when having sex (WHY did they cut that out? It'd only have made the movie about 10 seconds longer! And it would have made what follows in the movie make at least a little more sense).

So, if it wasn't "just a dream", and if he really did go back in time, does this mean he somehow altered history with his safe sex, well, sermon isn't the word for it, because he just says two sentences. But one assumes that with the deleted dialog in mind, Dwayne, presumably took those two sentences to heart, and lived to the present.

But then, ok, so how is it that what happens in this altered reality affect our own reality? I mean, I initially had the idea that Brad how some ended up in an alternate universe of some sort? One wonders if Brad's alternate universe doppelganger (let's call him Straight Brad) didn't do the same thing, and go through the same adventure that Brad did (only that he starts off dating a girl, and then finds him wanting to be Roland, Dwayne, or whomever), and as he prepared to leave, turned to Dwayne and gave him the same warning (because, presumably in the alternate reality there's an AIDS like plague that initially appears in the straight community). Hence, both realities are affected, and in both, Dwayne lives.

Or am I reading too much into the news broadcast thing? Given the behaviour of the moderator (who eventually tells the religious zealot to "SHUT UP, YOU BREEDER!!!"), one wonders if it's not just a delusion, just happening in Brad's head, and that Dwayne didn't live. That's maybe the one fault with the audio commentary, that Marc Moody doesn't actually explain Dwayne's presence in the debate (instead, he's just chuckling over the "Christians Opposed To People Who Disagree With Us" line). Oh well, I guess any good movies needs to leave something up to it's viewers to decide. :-)

reply

[deleted]

I think you shouldnt try to think too much on it. There doenst seem to be any real answers to it all. Pick what makes you happiest and let the rest go.

reply

No, there are legit questions to the ending. This film was tested in several markets. Almost all viewers were not getting the condom connection between Dwayne and Brad - when Brad mentions it to Dwayne before he leaves. They thought the filmmakers were making some kind of Public Services Announcement on AIDS.

So they cut it out.

reply

<<Almost all viewers were not getting the condom connection between Dwayne and Brad - when Brad mentions it to Dwayne before he leaves. They thought the filmmakers were making some kind of Public Services Announcement on AIDS.

So they cut it out.>>

I see. It's kind of a shame that it was percieved that way, because removing those one or two lines of dialog kinda puts a plothole in the story. It makes sense if you've seen the DVD, but like the one guy who asked, if you saw it on TV, you might be thinking "Wha?!".

Anyway, it was a fun movie. I need to rent it again.

reply

Isn't the moderator Brad's (40yo) date in the beginning (who said, "Mount me")?
I feel like the TV show was a hallucination that is supposed to foreshadow Roland's reappearance.

I think it's natural to question stuff when denouement seems unfulfilling-though it's more enjoyable not to. So who's fault was it?

reply

<<Isn't the moderator Brad's (40yo) date in the beginning (who said, "Mount me")?>>

Yeah, in fact, on the audio commentary, the director says that it's meant to be the exact same person.

<<I feel like the TV show was a hallucination that is supposed to foreshadow Roland's reappearance. >>>

Yeah, maybe so.

<<I think it's natural to question stuff when denouement seems unfulfilling-though it's more enjoyable not to. So who's fault was it?>>

It's not that it was unfulfilling, I guess I just want to believe that Brad was able to alter history with his comment "wear a rubber" comment and thusly saving Dwayne from a premature death.

I suppose that's one of those things about indie movies: a lot of times, things aren't spelled out in a concrete way (as they are in Hollywood). Hence, you're left to make your own interpetration of what happens.

reply

Early in the film, Brad admitted he never told Dwayne he was gay. When Brad went back in time, he admitted to Dwayne he was hetero. That should have been enough to change the future, with or without the condom speech.

"I am not a merry man." -Michael Dorn as Worf as Will Scarlet

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]