MovieChat Forums > Push (2009) Discussion > Did you find 14 year old Dakota Fanning ...

Did you find 14 year old Dakota Fanning hot in this?


Well the knee-jerk reaction to this would be, of course, "No" but damn it, why did they have to put her in that outfit with the miniskirt and those high black boots that we'd call sexy on anyone over the age of consent in your jurisdiction... showing a lot of leg, doll-like pale skin and a lot of doe-eyed shots.

I think when you put an actress in that kind of outfit you mustbe trying to make her hot.

Gross? Eh, I blame the creators of the film.

reply

Historically speaking, it's very difficult to transition from child actor to teen actor. Seems the same problems will haunt Dakota. She was truly an amazingly dramatic child actor. None of her recent films have been any good, nor was her acting. I really hope that her great early talent gets "found" again by a great script and a great director.

***So I've seen 4 movies/wk in theatre for a 1/4 century, call me crazy?**

reply

yes i know that hard for them becoz they always remember as a little girl but i know dakota will pull that off..
there is a new movie for dakota "now is good" thats her latest film and i know shes brilliant in there so the critics says..
some says that it not hard for her to trasition on a lead role...no sweat.:-)
goodluck for her

reply

Grammar?

reply

LOL I think it went THAT way ---------------------->

reply

Ill just say she had my attention the whole time, is that enough?

reply

I watched her, she was good in this flick.

You Have a Hard Lip, Herbert..

Better Living Thru Chemistry

reply

I never found Dakota Fanning hot in any of her other movies... but just seeing Push today; I actually found her attractive... much more so than Camilla Belle who is closer to my age. Maybe it was the combination of her makeup outfit hair and acting.

reply

Not that I don't find the little skank very unattractive in Push,
I don't find her at all attractive in any of her movies. Period.
Every movie I saw with her she is being so annoying, makes me want to slap her.

reply

was it supposed to be sexy? because seeing a child dress like that throughout the whole movie was sad, not sexy, at least for me that is. i don't understand why they dressed her like that.

reply

Really? You dont understand why she was dressed like that? Because i thought it was pretty obvious. She was a teeage girl with no parents taking care or controlling her. She's in the age girls are when they start wanting to appear sexy, using makeup and clothes for that purpose.

reply

"Well the knee-jerk reaction to this would be, of course, "No" but damn it, why did they have to put her in that outfit with the miniskirt and those high black boots that we'd call sexy on anyone over the age of consent in your jurisdiction... showing a lot of leg, doll-like pale skin and a lot of doe-eyed shots.

I think when you put an actress in that kind of outfit you mustbe trying to make her hot.

Gross? Eh, I blame the creators of the film"

Well, age ain't nothin' but a number to me ... like the great late Aaliyah said. I am not so judgemental that I base a person's hotness by her mere age that she can't control and has absolutely NOTHING to do with how she looks or carry herself. However, I did not find Dakota Fanning hot in this movie. I did like the movie overall though.

reply

Sorry, but no.

Camilla Belle, Chris Evans and Xiao Lu Li, on the other hand.... yes!

reply

No. If you put a good-looking boy in a thong I wouldn't find him hot either.

I can recognize beauty in babies, children, young adults, and old people but finding them hot is different. But that's me.

reply

If you put a good-looking boy in a thong I wouldn't find him hot either.
Lol. What a joke. With the massive amount of female teachers being busted for underaged pedophilia in the news. I have a HARD time believing that!

Has everything that's happened, already happened? Should I stay exactly the same?

reply

Oh so your logic works, a few female teachers have relations with teenage or preteen boys equals to all females being pedophiles. Don't project your fantasies unto others.


And yes here in the Philippines, it's normal to see some kids in thongs or briefs, no one gives them a second glance. But I'm sure you'd be lusting after them.




Global Warming, it's a personal decision innit? - Nigel Tufnel

reply

Don't project your fantasies unto others.
But I'm sure you'd be lusting after them.
Seems to me, that you are the one projecting!

a few female teachers have relations with teenage or preteen boys equals
Here in America, there are so many female teachers getting busted for it. So it isn't just a few, capiche? All of these females are really good looking, too!

Has everything that's happened, already happened? Should I stay exactly the same?

reply

You clearly have women issues. And you're the one projecting your pedophilia fantasies.



Global Warming, it's a personal decision innit? - Nigel Tufnel

reply

No, you are! You said this:

I am lusting after them.

Right after I said, "It is mostly females teacher that get caught for it."

Has everything that's happened, already happened? Should I stay exactly the same?

reply

Try to educate yourself on the basic facts of an issue before you start rambling about it. Paedophilia means primary or exclusive attraction to pre-pubescent children. You are talking about hebephilia or more commonly ephebophilia, in the context of news headline teacher/pupil scandals.



The mirror... it's broken.
Yes, I know. I like it that way. Makes me look the way I feel.

reply

You are right. It is hebephilia. At least I admitted my mistake. Vicky on the other hand, still looks foolish.

reply

No. If you put a good-looking boy in a thong I wouldn't find him hot either.

It's hardly the same thing and the fact that you know it is yet still push the propaganda you wish was true is just incredible to me! Humanity can be made to believe or say anything with enough pressure and conditioning. So much so that you'll dismiss something" as clear a day so long as there's a "study" to back it up. Of course, nobody asks who conducted the study? What was their agenda? And how was it conducted? Science says...that's enough for me! "Science" in the West has replaced religion but is believed with the same blind devotion. "Those dummies believed those ladies in Salem in the 1700's were witches...what idiots! BTW...did you hear some guy said Bruce/Catlyn Jenner must have mental problems? What a biggot! How can he not know that there's nothing "crazy" about a women believing she's trapped in a man's body?"
In the paper today...tales of war and of waste
But you turn right over to the T.V. page

reply