Essex's ally


Who was the character/actor who played Essex's friend, who stood by him in the final battle against the Queen, but who eventually claimed that he lied (when the two were on trial)?

reply

From the picture he's got posted, I believe it's Simon Woods with a wig and a moustache-thingie.

Nort

He's got a TOWEL![runs away]

reply

Essex's ally is Henry Wriothesley, 3rd Earl of Southampton who is played by Eddie Redmayne. Southampton was not executed for his part in the rebellion, but imprisoned for a few years and later released by James I

reply

I thought Eddie Redmayne was fantastic as Southhampton. He made me cry near the end there....

Never fear, Brooklyn is here!<3
Save Darfur

reply

Grrrr he was an idiot.

He should have died too.

reply

Urgh I hated that character. He looked like a girl, and he was too cowardly to stand up to his crimes in the end. As least Essea did, however bad a person he was up till then!

"What value will their be in life if we are not together?"

reply

He looked like a girl


Lol! He doesn't look much better in the 'Elizabeth: The Golden Age' trailer!


‘Noli me tangere; for Caesar's I am’

reply

Seriously though Im not trying to be mean, but he has a really feminine face and that hair!!!

"What value will their be in life if we are not together?"

reply

Wasn't Southampton *meant* to be quite effeminate by the film-makers? There's quite good evidence that the historical Earl was. I think that's what the Queen means when she says 'Throw the little lapdog Southampton into the Tower' at the end of Episode 2.

reply

I've just been watching the DVD, and several of the deleted scenes leave the viewer in very little doubt as to Southampton's sexuality.

reply

i, too, saw it now and agree that the deleted scenes make clearer how southampton was - though he´s partly VERY young there (became friends with essex when he was 17) and kind of extreme mannered whippersnapper, always anxious/exerted for impressing essex; nevertheless he was a "good" soldier... .)

(laugh) i find it a nice thing that in one of the scenes he and essex are in theatre, watching "richard II" -- the drama, thatfor (? wherefor?) southampton- actor eddie redmayne got critic´s circle award for best shakespeare- performance this year (for "his" richard II).

uhmmm - could you understand what they say there? i´ve got the impression that they slag the richard- actor as "ugly" or something like that; the deleted scenes aren´t translated, not even subtitled). slaggering is poor behaviour and i dislike it; but it would be kind of funny in just that case, cause - in the drama - richard is called "beautiful", and with mr. redmayne there was a really beautiful richard on stage.


friendly wave

m.



ALL LIFE IS EQUAL

reply

Wasn't Southampton *meant* to be quite effeminate by the film-makers? There's quite good evidence that the historical Earl was.


I don't know about the historical evidence, but many people like to believe that the Earl of Southampton was the young addressee of Shakespeare's sonnets, who was described as being effeminate, notably in Sonnet 20, which begins,

"A woman's face with Nature's own hand painted
Hast thou, the master-mistress of my passion; "


The casting seems quite perfect in light of this.

reply

Most definitely agree, I couldn't stand his ally, wuss couldn't stand it like a man when time came that they were judged and sentenced!!!!! Take care.....


Peace To All

reply

yes, i agree he was.
i saw the deleted scenes, too, and in some of them southampton is years younger and an extremly affected boy, competing for essex´ attention and alway trying to impress him. there´s a maturing in the figure, and e. redmayne shows that very good.

(((g))) and in one of the scenes both are in theatre, watching RICHARD II; and this year mr. redmayne got the critic´s circle award for best shakespeare performance for acting just that richard... .

friendly wave

m.

ALL LIFE IS EQUAL

reply