I lasted all of 10 minutes. The camera work made me feel dizzy and sick. When the camera panned to another person it even went out of focus because it moved so fast. The storyline may have made it a good film..but I don't know as , like I said, I had to turn it off. Was it bad camera work or was it meant to be shot that way?
shareBelieve me, the camerawork was the best part of this. I saw it on Sci-fi a few weeks ago. TERRIBLE. It was a complete takeoff of the 1997 film "volcano" and given terrible acting, (excluding Michael Ironside. The only actor in the enitre film who's character was actually convincing.) a different city, and different cause of volcanic activity (at least the '97 one had some realistic details. not many, but they WERE there.)
I gave the movie a 2/10. I would give it a 1 or 0, but it has Michael Ironside in it, and his decent character boosted it a point or two.